Nikon D40 or Canon Digital Rebel XT


Recommended Posts

I'm going to have some money coming my way soon, and I have decided to buy a DSLR because my little Pentax Optio T10 isn't cutting it anymore. :p

I've narrowed it down to the Nikon D40 (about $500) and the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT (about $550). One of my questions is that the Nikon has 6.1MP and the Canon has 8MP - is that something I should worry about? Is 2MP that noticeable?

It looks like both cameras come with the same lens - 18-55mm f/3.5 - f/5.6. I don't plan on buying another lens right away, but which manufacturer has a better lens system?

I'm leaning towards the Nikon because it's a little cheaper, and I could use the extra money to buy a lens filter pack. Plus I like how it's all black rather than the silver. :p

Any information and help you can give me would be greatly appreciated. This would be my first DSLR, and I'm really excited. Thanks in advance guys.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/631008-nikon-d40-or-canon-digital-rebel-xt/
Share on other sites

I'm going to have some money coming my way soon, and I have decided to buy a DSLR because my little Pentax Optio T10 isn't cutting it anymore. :p

I've narrowed it down to the Nikon D40 (about $500) and the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT (about $550). One of my questions is that the Nikon has 6.1MP and the Canon has 8MP - is that something I should worry about? Is 2MP that noticeable?

It looks like both cameras come with the same lens - 18-55mm f/3.5 - f/5.6. I don't plan on buying another lens right away, but which manufacturer has a better lens system?

I'm leaning towards the Nikon because it's a little cheaper, and I could use the extra money to buy a lens filter pack. Plus I like how it's all black rather than the silver. :p

Any information and help you can give me would be greatly appreciated. This would be my first DSLR, and I'm really excited. Thanks in advance guys.

I had both the D40 and the XT.

I prefer the D40, the XT was too large for me.

I decided Nikon has superior lenses for the price they charge over canon.

Also unless you are making poster's i doubt you will miss the extra 2MP.

The d40 is a great starter camera and can be used as a backup when you move up to something more advanced down the line.

D40: nicer body ergonomics, better kit lens, larger 2.5" screen, friendlier menu system for beginners (has nice helpful hints), auto iso (when you dont want to mess with iso), spot metering

XT: 2MP extra, better noise performance (for low light shooting), dedicated buttons for settings changes (rather than in-menu), faster/better autofocus, focus motor (for using AF on older fast prime lens), bracketing (HDR guys use this a lot), depth of field preview,

You can't go wrong with either--I owned both and was happy with either as each have trade off features. Nikon nor Canon have "superior" lens--they're both great and are priced similarly. (though usually nikon a bit higher)

By the way, the XT is $440 and is black too.

My suggestion is to go to the store and try them both.

I had both the D40 and the XT.

I prefer the D40, the XT was too large for me.

I decided Nikon has superior lenses for the price they charge over canon.

Also unless you are making poster's i doubt you will miss the extra 2MP.

The d40 is a great starter camera and can be used as a backup when you move up to something more advanced down the line.

Thanks a lot for the help. Like giga said below, I'm going to go to a store to try out both to see which I like better. And good thinking on using it as a backup later on. I definitely plan on purchasing a more advanced camera once I get everything down. :)

D40: nicer body ergonomics, better kit lens, larger 2.5" screen, friendlier menu system for beginners, auto iso, spot metering

XT: 2MP extra, better noise performance, dedicated buttons for settings changes (rather than in-menu), faster/better autofocus, focus motor (for using AF on older fast prime lens), bracketing (HDR guys use this a lot), depth of field preview,

You can't go wrong with either--I owned both and was happy with either as each have trade off features. Nikon nor Canon have "superior" lens--they're both great and are priced similarly. (though usually nikon a bit higher)

By the way, the XT is $440 and is black too.

My suggestion is to go to the store and try them both.

Thanks a lot giga. Couple questions regarding what you said:

1. By noise performance, do you mean it produces better pictures in less light?

2. Autofocus - I don't really plan on doing any fast motion or action photography, so should this be a big factor in deciding?

3. Bracketing - Since the Nikon doesn't have it, I can still make an HDR picture with a RAW file, right?

4. DOF preview - this just shows the DOF before you take the picture, right? Whereas the Nikon would show me the image after I pressed the shutter?

And thanks for finding the Canon in black and cheaper. I was looking on Amazon and didn't think of checking on Butterfly. :laugh:

Thanks so much for the help so far guys. I really appreciate it. (Y)

Thanks a lot for the help. Like giga said below, I'm going to go to a store to try out both to see which I like better. And good thinking on using it as a backup later on. I definitely plan on purchasing a more advanced camera once I get everything down. :)

Thanks a lot giga. Couple questions regarding what you said:

1. By noise performance, do you mean it produces better pictures in less light?

2. Autofocus - I don't really plan on doing any fast motion or action photography, so should this be a big factor in deciding?

3. Bracketing - Since the Nikon doesn't have it, I can still make an HDR picture with a RAW file, right?

4. DOF preview - this just shows the DOF before you take the picture, right? Whereas the Nikon would show me the image after I pressed the shutter?

Thanks so much for the help so far guys. I really appreciate it. (Y)

1. Yes. When using high ISO.

2. Probably not, but it's good to have when needed. This can be as simple as a little kid moving in front of you or focusing objects in poor lighting conditions.

3. Instead of the camera automatically making adjustments, you'll have to change it manually. Actual HDR is more than just "one" raw exposure, it's a combination of several exposures. (dark one, regular one, bright one)

4. Yes.

1. Yes. When using high ISO.

2. Probably not, but it's good to have when needed. This can be as simple as a little kid moving in front of you or focusing objects in poor lighting conditions.

3. Instead of the camera automatically making adjustments, you'll have to change it manually. Actual HDR is more than just "one" raw exposure, it's a combination of several exposures. (dark one, regular one, bright one)

4. Yes.

That was quick! :p I love shooting architecture and nature, so I don't think I'll have too many kids running in front. The poor lighting conditions might be an issue though. And I know HDR is multiple exposures, but can't you edit the RAW to give you the three different exposures? I thought that was why RAW was preferred over JPG. And the DOF preview doesn't really matter to me. I don't mind checking after I take the picture.

Thanks again giga.

While the single raw HDR technique works, I much prefer multiple exposure bracketing for the fact that you're actually capturing that extra detail in the separate exposures, rather than just pushing the numbers from the single raw.

I've ran into problems before with the single raw HDR technique where the exposure wasn't perfect in the first place and ended up with blown highlights or darks--that can't be brought out even if it's a raw.

While the single raw HDR technique works, I much prefer multiple exposure bracketing for the fact that you're actually capturing that extra detail in the separate exposures, rather than just pushing the numbers from the single raw.

I've ran into problems before with the single raw HDR technique where the exposure wasn't perfect in the first place and ended up with blown highlights or darks--that can't be brought out even if it's a raw.

I can still bracket with the Nikon though? I just have to go and set it manually each time, right? That wouldn't bother me that much.

Edited by MasterC
30D is $750 ;).

A used 20D would be about $500.

Yeah it's true, but the way I see it is that we go into SLR for manual control and with D40 and XT it's kinda crippled. imho, it's totally worth saving an extra buck to go one notch up :) For people who want to point and shoot with a SLR - D40 and XT are probably going to be excellent thou :D

30D is $750 ;).

And that's on the high side for me. I'm getting a couple grand and 98% of it is used up for something else, so I don't have that much to work with. Trust me, I'd love to get a 30D, but the two cameras I chose are more of my price range for now. I can always upgrade later!

i would pick XT as it allows u to use prime lens with af. with a tight buget prime lens such as 50 1.8 and 35 2 are quite viable options for low light shots.

Thanks moonman. I think I'm going to end up going with the XT for a couple reasons that you guys have pointed out. I'll let you guys know when I get it!

Thanks for everything, guys! :)

Oh I love my 50mm f/1.8.

But yes, I'm a big fan of Canon and specifically my XTI. The Rebel is a fine choice (Y)

I agree. I've been comparing the two, and while the Nikon is nice, the Rebel seems like a much better fit for me. It's funny because I was the complete opposite a couple days ago - I had my mind set on the D40! Goes to show what a little asking around and researching can do. ;)

I agree. I've been comparing the two, and while the Nikon is nice, the Rebel seems like a much better fit for me. It's funny because I was the complete opposite a couple days ago - I had my mind set on the D40! Goes to show what a little asking around and researching can do. ;)

+1 for the Rebel, I've just got one and its an absolute dream to use, make sure you get it in matt black though its much nicer than the silver gloss ;)

I loved all the time I spent with my XT, a great camera that served me well. I can't say I've ever had a single complaint about it. Survived just about everything from being dropped, to the one unfortunate swim in a big puddle. I replaced it this morning with a shiny new Rebel XSI. All I need now is a little more free time and more cooperative weather.

+1 for the Rebel, I've just got one and its an absolute dream to use, make sure you get it in matt black though its much nicer than the silver gloss ;)

I'll most definitely get it in black. I'm not too fond of the silver. :laugh:

+2 :) I have the silver gloss though :( big mistake...

You could paint it :p

I bought the Nikon, very happy with it (Y)

Either way, they are both supposed to be great so you can't really go wrong!

Thanks :)

I loved all the time I spent with my XT, a great camera that served me well. I can't say I've ever had a single complaint about it. Survived just about everything from being dropped, to the one unfortunate swim in a big puddle. I replaced it this morning with a shiny new Rebel XSI. All I need now is a little more free time and more cooperative weather.

If it survived that, I should be okay! And congrats on the purchase.

I Just bought the D60 a few weeks ago - after playing with the XTi for about 5 days, (I know this is a level up from you). I really enjoyed the XTi, but in the end I decided to go with D60. I found the colours on the D60 to be a more true to my eye, I like the build quality of the Nikon over the XTi as well as the kit lens on the D60, it does **** me off though that the D60 doesn't have the AF motor and it can only shoot raw+basic jpeg and like the other people here said I do miss the bracketing feature and the minutely faster focus, although I found it only really effected me in low light situations. Regardless of those negatives the colour is the most important thing to me and I wouldnt change it for the XTi or any other entry level DSLR!!!

Like I said, this is teh level up from you but I'm assuming that they are similar.

Good luck and have fun!

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!