Nikon D40 or Canon Digital Rebel XT


Recommended Posts

I'm going to have some money coming my way soon, and I have decided to buy a DSLR because my little Pentax Optio T10 isn't cutting it anymore. :p

I've narrowed it down to the Nikon D40 (about $500) and the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT (about $550). One of my questions is that the Nikon has 6.1MP and the Canon has 8MP - is that something I should worry about? Is 2MP that noticeable?

It looks like both cameras come with the same lens - 18-55mm f/3.5 - f/5.6. I don't plan on buying another lens right away, but which manufacturer has a better lens system?

I'm leaning towards the Nikon because it's a little cheaper, and I could use the extra money to buy a lens filter pack. Plus I like how it's all black rather than the silver. :p

Any information and help you can give me would be greatly appreciated. This would be my first DSLR, and I'm really excited. Thanks in advance guys.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/631008-nikon-d40-or-canon-digital-rebel-xt/
Share on other sites

I'm going to have some money coming my way soon, and I have decided to buy a DSLR because my little Pentax Optio T10 isn't cutting it anymore. :p

I've narrowed it down to the Nikon D40 (about $500) and the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT (about $550). One of my questions is that the Nikon has 6.1MP and the Canon has 8MP - is that something I should worry about? Is 2MP that noticeable?

It looks like both cameras come with the same lens - 18-55mm f/3.5 - f/5.6. I don't plan on buying another lens right away, but which manufacturer has a better lens system?

I'm leaning towards the Nikon because it's a little cheaper, and I could use the extra money to buy a lens filter pack. Plus I like how it's all black rather than the silver. :p

Any information and help you can give me would be greatly appreciated. This would be my first DSLR, and I'm really excited. Thanks in advance guys.

I had both the D40 and the XT.

I prefer the D40, the XT was too large for me.

I decided Nikon has superior lenses for the price they charge over canon.

Also unless you are making poster's i doubt you will miss the extra 2MP.

The d40 is a great starter camera and can be used as a backup when you move up to something more advanced down the line.

D40: nicer body ergonomics, better kit lens, larger 2.5" screen, friendlier menu system for beginners (has nice helpful hints), auto iso (when you dont want to mess with iso), spot metering

XT: 2MP extra, better noise performance (for low light shooting), dedicated buttons for settings changes (rather than in-menu), faster/better autofocus, focus motor (for using AF on older fast prime lens), bracketing (HDR guys use this a lot), depth of field preview,

You can't go wrong with either--I owned both and was happy with either as each have trade off features. Nikon nor Canon have "superior" lens--they're both great and are priced similarly. (though usually nikon a bit higher)

By the way, the XT is $440 and is black too.

My suggestion is to go to the store and try them both.

I had both the D40 and the XT.

I prefer the D40, the XT was too large for me.

I decided Nikon has superior lenses for the price they charge over canon.

Also unless you are making poster's i doubt you will miss the extra 2MP.

The d40 is a great starter camera and can be used as a backup when you move up to something more advanced down the line.

Thanks a lot for the help. Like giga said below, I'm going to go to a store to try out both to see which I like better. And good thinking on using it as a backup later on. I definitely plan on purchasing a more advanced camera once I get everything down. :)

D40: nicer body ergonomics, better kit lens, larger 2.5" screen, friendlier menu system for beginners, auto iso, spot metering

XT: 2MP extra, better noise performance, dedicated buttons for settings changes (rather than in-menu), faster/better autofocus, focus motor (for using AF on older fast prime lens), bracketing (HDR guys use this a lot), depth of field preview,

You can't go wrong with either--I owned both and was happy with either as each have trade off features. Nikon nor Canon have "superior" lens--they're both great and are priced similarly. (though usually nikon a bit higher)

By the way, the XT is $440 and is black too.

My suggestion is to go to the store and try them both.

Thanks a lot giga. Couple questions regarding what you said:

1. By noise performance, do you mean it produces better pictures in less light?

2. Autofocus - I don't really plan on doing any fast motion or action photography, so should this be a big factor in deciding?

3. Bracketing - Since the Nikon doesn't have it, I can still make an HDR picture with a RAW file, right?

4. DOF preview - this just shows the DOF before you take the picture, right? Whereas the Nikon would show me the image after I pressed the shutter?

And thanks for finding the Canon in black and cheaper. I was looking on Amazon and didn't think of checking on Butterfly. :laugh:

Thanks so much for the help so far guys. I really appreciate it. (Y)

Thanks a lot for the help. Like giga said below, I'm going to go to a store to try out both to see which I like better. And good thinking on using it as a backup later on. I definitely plan on purchasing a more advanced camera once I get everything down. :)

Thanks a lot giga. Couple questions regarding what you said:

1. By noise performance, do you mean it produces better pictures in less light?

2. Autofocus - I don't really plan on doing any fast motion or action photography, so should this be a big factor in deciding?

3. Bracketing - Since the Nikon doesn't have it, I can still make an HDR picture with a RAW file, right?

4. DOF preview - this just shows the DOF before you take the picture, right? Whereas the Nikon would show me the image after I pressed the shutter?

Thanks so much for the help so far guys. I really appreciate it. (Y)

1. Yes. When using high ISO.

2. Probably not, but it's good to have when needed. This can be as simple as a little kid moving in front of you or focusing objects in poor lighting conditions.

3. Instead of the camera automatically making adjustments, you'll have to change it manually. Actual HDR is more than just "one" raw exposure, it's a combination of several exposures. (dark one, regular one, bright one)

4. Yes.

1. Yes. When using high ISO.

2. Probably not, but it's good to have when needed. This can be as simple as a little kid moving in front of you or focusing objects in poor lighting conditions.

3. Instead of the camera automatically making adjustments, you'll have to change it manually. Actual HDR is more than just "one" raw exposure, it's a combination of several exposures. (dark one, regular one, bright one)

4. Yes.

That was quick! :p I love shooting architecture and nature, so I don't think I'll have too many kids running in front. The poor lighting conditions might be an issue though. And I know HDR is multiple exposures, but can't you edit the RAW to give you the three different exposures? I thought that was why RAW was preferred over JPG. And the DOF preview doesn't really matter to me. I don't mind checking after I take the picture.

Thanks again giga.

While the single raw HDR technique works, I much prefer multiple exposure bracketing for the fact that you're actually capturing that extra detail in the separate exposures, rather than just pushing the numbers from the single raw.

I've ran into problems before with the single raw HDR technique where the exposure wasn't perfect in the first place and ended up with blown highlights or darks--that can't be brought out even if it's a raw.

While the single raw HDR technique works, I much prefer multiple exposure bracketing for the fact that you're actually capturing that extra detail in the separate exposures, rather than just pushing the numbers from the single raw.

I've ran into problems before with the single raw HDR technique where the exposure wasn't perfect in the first place and ended up with blown highlights or darks--that can't be brought out even if it's a raw.

I can still bracket with the Nikon though? I just have to go and set it manually each time, right? That wouldn't bother me that much.

Edited by MasterC
30D is $750 ;).

A used 20D would be about $500.

Yeah it's true, but the way I see it is that we go into SLR for manual control and with D40 and XT it's kinda crippled. imho, it's totally worth saving an extra buck to go one notch up :) For people who want to point and shoot with a SLR - D40 and XT are probably going to be excellent thou :D

30D is $750 ;).

And that's on the high side for me. I'm getting a couple grand and 98% of it is used up for something else, so I don't have that much to work with. Trust me, I'd love to get a 30D, but the two cameras I chose are more of my price range for now. I can always upgrade later!

i would pick XT as it allows u to use prime lens with af. with a tight buget prime lens such as 50 1.8 and 35 2 are quite viable options for low light shots.

Thanks moonman. I think I'm going to end up going with the XT for a couple reasons that you guys have pointed out. I'll let you guys know when I get it!

Thanks for everything, guys! :)

Oh I love my 50mm f/1.8.

But yes, I'm a big fan of Canon and specifically my XTI. The Rebel is a fine choice (Y)

I agree. I've been comparing the two, and while the Nikon is nice, the Rebel seems like a much better fit for me. It's funny because I was the complete opposite a couple days ago - I had my mind set on the D40! Goes to show what a little asking around and researching can do. ;)

I agree. I've been comparing the two, and while the Nikon is nice, the Rebel seems like a much better fit for me. It's funny because I was the complete opposite a couple days ago - I had my mind set on the D40! Goes to show what a little asking around and researching can do. ;)

+1 for the Rebel, I've just got one and its an absolute dream to use, make sure you get it in matt black though its much nicer than the silver gloss ;)

I loved all the time I spent with my XT, a great camera that served me well. I can't say I've ever had a single complaint about it. Survived just about everything from being dropped, to the one unfortunate swim in a big puddle. I replaced it this morning with a shiny new Rebel XSI. All I need now is a little more free time and more cooperative weather.

+1 for the Rebel, I've just got one and its an absolute dream to use, make sure you get it in matt black though its much nicer than the silver gloss ;)

I'll most definitely get it in black. I'm not too fond of the silver. :laugh:

+2 :) I have the silver gloss though :( big mistake...

You could paint it :p

I bought the Nikon, very happy with it (Y)

Either way, they are both supposed to be great so you can't really go wrong!

Thanks :)

I loved all the time I spent with my XT, a great camera that served me well. I can't say I've ever had a single complaint about it. Survived just about everything from being dropped, to the one unfortunate swim in a big puddle. I replaced it this morning with a shiny new Rebel XSI. All I need now is a little more free time and more cooperative weather.

If it survived that, I should be okay! And congrats on the purchase.

I Just bought the D60 a few weeks ago - after playing with the XTi for about 5 days, (I know this is a level up from you). I really enjoyed the XTi, but in the end I decided to go with D60. I found the colours on the D60 to be a more true to my eye, I like the build quality of the Nikon over the XTi as well as the kit lens on the D60, it does **** me off though that the D60 doesn't have the AF motor and it can only shoot raw+basic jpeg and like the other people here said I do miss the bracketing feature and the minutely faster focus, although I found it only really effected me in low light situations. Regardless of those negatives the colour is the most important thing to me and I wouldnt change it for the XTi or any other entry level DSLR!!!

Like I said, this is teh level up from you but I'm assuming that they are similar.

Good luck and have fun!

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!