Does Neowin delete member accounts?


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

physically "deleting" accounts also deletes their posts which can ruin threads for other users and people searching on google. there is a reason for the ruling.

That is a viable reason of sorts, maybe. The one I quoted, is nonsense. 
 

When I left Majorgeeks, I had admin rights. I deleted my account and left the posts. I’ve little doubt that it’s optional with the forum software here too. 

7 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

That is a viable reason of sorts, maybe. The one I quoted, is nonsense. 
 

When I left Majorgeeks, I had admin rights. I deleted my account and left the posts. I’ve little doubt that it’s optional with the forum software here too. 

there is and that is what we do for the GDPR requests.

 

The issue is half the time when a user requests their account deleted they demand their posts go with it; so it's lose lose no matter which option we choose.

We'd like to keep post association unless absolutely necessary.

 

edit: as you can see this rule has been in place since 2008 or possibly even longer and no one really complained about it until GDPR came into play ...

3 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

there is and that is what we do for the GDPR requests.

 

The issue is half the time when a user requests their account deleted they demand their posts go with it; so it's lose lose no matter which option we choose.

We'd like to keep post association unless absolutely necessary.

 

edit: as you can see this rule has been in place since 2008 or possibly even longer and no one really complained about it until GDPR came into play ...

Of course nobody complained about it until GDPR. They had no legal recourse. Assuming it’s true that literally nobody complained. 

1 minute ago, adrynalyne said:

Of course nobody complained about it until GDPR. They had no legal recourse. Assuming it’s true that literally nobody complained. 

except most of the recent complaints since GDPR have been from members not even in participating regions.

 

post 1 makes a perfectly viable solution; remove all your own association with the account and let it be; no mod/supervisor/owner involvement needed; why does physical database deletion even need to come into play? (at least that's how I see it in my mind)

7 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

except most of the recent complaints since GDPR have been from members not even in participating regions.

 

post 1 makes a perfectly viable solution; remove all your own association with the account and let it be; no mod/supervisor/owner involvement needed; why does physical database deletion even need to come into play? (at least that's how I see it in my mind)

Before security compromises, everyone says the same thing. That’s why these folks want actual deletion. 
 

I get it that people not in GDPR regions are still trying to cash in, just because we don’t have the protections doesn’t mean we wouldn’t like them. 
 

This is a very adversarial approach to take when privacy is a big concern these days. 
 

As an aside, what you initially quoted me on is not really the same thing you and I are discussing now. 

7 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Before security compromises, everyone says the same thing. That’s why these folks want actual deletion.

If you've removed all association with the account (changed name, changed to a dummy email address, removed account links, ect.) then why would a chance of security compromise worry you? just saying, things don't have to be taken to the extreme all the time.

 

edit: I understand the concern as most sites log previous settings and or don't allow dissociating the account but a forum software like IPB does; we don't log old email addresses or anything once changed. Heck I don't even think IPB logs previous user names like old versions used to.

11 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

If you've removed all association with the account (changed name, changed to a dummy email address, removed account links, ect.) then why would a chance of security compromise worry you? just saying, things don't have to be taken to the extreme all the time.

 

edit: I understand the concern as most sites log previous settings and or don't allow dissociating the account but a forum software like IPB does; we don't log old email addresses or anything once changed. Heck I don't even think IPB logs previous user names like old versions used to.

You are asking people to trust that the administrators have done that. Rinse and repeat what I said. All too often in the past, security compromises have shown that doesn’t always happen. 
 

I get that it’s an inconvenience to you guys but privacy friendly sites go far in this day and age. Just sayin. 

Once you post something to a public forum, it becomes property of that forum.. How F'd would threads be if they deleted some X thousand posts?  Answers to a question for example is now gone and the thread just a bunch of gibberish with all the actual good content missing.

 

The forum if you get ticked off or whatever, can remove a persons username from the content.. Asking for the content to be removed is nonsense..  Before account created there is info to read that goes over stuff.

 

Additionally you also agree that Neowin does not delete member content should you choose to leave.

And as always, we encourage you not to post personal identifiable information in topics.

 

Has that policy been changed, and before they stated they would delete content?  If so then might have some grounds to stand on, if when created account it was specifically stated in the use policy or privacy policy that all your content would be deleted.  Been here a lot of years, I do not recall such a policy ever.

 

In all the years I have been on forums, this has never been the case...  Is there some link to some forum that states that if person leaves all their content will be deleted?  I might head over there, answer a bunch of questions and then just to be a D___ have my account deleted ;)

1 hour ago, Brandon H said:

Edit: as you can see this rule has been in place since 2008 or possibly even longer and no one really complained about it until GDPR came into play ...

Nonsense. People have always requested account deletions and have had plenty to say about it when no. It’s why this thread was created in the first place. 
 

There have also been several account deletions over the years. Keldyn for example. 

There is a big difference between the owners of the forum making the call to delete user and or content.. And a user calling for it... Did this keldyn account call for deletion or was it a call made by neowin?

Yes to which.. User asked, or Neowin decided? ;)

 

How much content?  Was it a year or years worth of good stuff that contributed to the flow of multiple threads... Or was it utter junk?

 

 

4 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Yes to which.. User asked, or Neowin decided? ;)

 

How much content?  Was it a year or years worth of good stuff that contributed to the flow of multiple threads... Or was it utter junk?

 

 

He was a core member back in the day and also on staff. 
 

And I’ll let someone chime in on the reasons why as it’s not my place, but yes, it was requested from them and not by admins.

Well that is their call, as stated its their site..  Nothing forcing you to post here, or actually use your real name or anything.. skockz, is that your real name?  If I google it other than info on this site will I find your home address your web site with your place of business, etc. etc..?

 

You posting personal info on a public forum is on you...  Not sure why anyone could ever think that once something is posted to the net that there is some right to removal of said info.. Read the GDPR policy - where does it state that?  I have read it multiple times, and I do not recall such a clause.. Lets say the site deleted your posts - who says they are not available on some archive site or wayback machine site, etc.

 

The only way anyone has any legs to stand on in a complaint of such is if their previous policy clearly stated that upon request any and all info and or posted content by you would be deleted.  Which I do not believe it ever did.. Do you have say a screenshot of this old policy, a wayback url that shows said info, etc. etc. ;)

 

If you do not like such policy - pretty sure your free to leave.. Nothing forcing you to post content here...

 

edit: @eddman, yes if requested I am sure they can change the name of the poster of content... I have seen this on multiple other locations..

 

Not sure how anyone can think posting up their opinion on XYZ, or how to get ABC working is some sort of personal data or information.. Such content does not fall under GDPR no matter how you look at it...

 

To be honest, you could prob make a good argument in court that your choice of nickname is not your personal data either ;)  Is shockz any sort of legal documentation of for your name?  Is that on your birth certificate... So while they can remove your email address that ties said posting to you in some way... So unless you used your real legal name as your nick - I don't even think they need to do anything but removal of personal info tied to that nick.. Like your real name or address, etc.

30 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Once you post something to a public forum, it becomes property of that forum.. How F'd would threads be if they deleted your 20k some posts?  Your answer to a question for example is now gone and the thread just a bunch of gibberish with all the actual good content missing.

 

The forum if you get ticked off or whatever, can remove your username from the content.. Asking for the content to be removed is nonsense.. Did you read before you created an account and posted?

 

Additionally you also agree that Neowin does not delete member content should you choose to leave.

And as always, we encourage you not to post personal identifiable information in topics.

 

Are you saying that policy has been changed, and before they stated they would delete your content?  If so then you might have some grounds to stand on, if when you created your account it was specifically stated in the use policy or privacy policy that you wanted to leave all your content would be deleted.  Been here a lot of years, I do not recall such a policy ever.

 

In all the years I have been on forums, this has never been the case...  Do you have a link to some forum that states that if you leave all your content will be deleted?  I might head over there, answer a bunch of questions and then just to be a D___ have my account deleted ;)

Who exactly are you talking to? I didn’t ask my content to be deleted. 

11 minutes ago, eddman said:

I don't know much about forum software, but would it be possible to configure it in a way that when an account is deleted, it'd change the username of the forum posts to, say, "anonymous", or simply "deleted"?

Depending on the software, yes. 

The topic in general it was not meant to be specifically directed at you.  Did I give that impression?  Oh the # posts things - that is where it prob got the Impression - sorry that was just number that I saw while typing I can edit it sot reflect X thousands of post which is more generic.

 

I reworded a bit, after I reread it I could see how you might of thought that specifically directed at you - which was not my intent.

  • Like 2
19 hours ago, shockz said:

He was a core member back in the day and also on staff. 
 

And I’ll let someone chime in on the reasons why as it’s not my place, but yes, it was requested from them and not by admins.

That was an exceptional circumstance.

 

Neowin reserves the right to change or alter these [Forum] rules at any time and an Administrator's word is final - This has been a forum rule/ guideline since day 1.

 

we reserve the right to do what we think is in the best interests of Neowin LLC. As such we feel that unless required by law (which we always comply with) accounts/ posts should not be removed as it messes up forum threads and can be used maliciously.

1 hour ago, Daniel F. said:

That was an exceptional circumstance.

 

Neowin reserves the right to change or alter these [Forum] rules at any time and an Administrator's word is final - This has been a forum rule/ guideline since day 1.

 

we reserve the right to do what we think is in the best interests of Neowin LLC. As such we feel that unless required by law (which we always comply with) accounts/ posts should not be removed as it messes up forum threads and can be used maliciously.

I’ll bite. How can it be used maliciously?

Here is a scenario... I gain access to user X email address... I now request that some site remove all posts made by "me".. How does the site validate its you?  You have access to the email address - no other info was collected when account was created, etc.  So guess its the owner of said content ;)

 

Oh that IP address thing from where I posted in the past - yeah I changed isp is why the IP changed ;)

37 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I’ll bite. How can it be used maliciously?

we've had a few cases where a highly contributing member had a change of attitude and suddenly wanted all their posts deleted along with their account; this would make many thready lose contributions and answers making the threads harder to follow if not completely broken for anyone else viewing them later.

 

that's just one possibility that Neowin has had to deal with in the past that I would consider malicious.

25 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Here is a scenario... I gain access to user X email address... I now request that some site remove all posts made by "me".. How does the site validate its you?  You have access to the email address - no other info was collected when account was created, etc.  So guess its the owner of said content ;)

 

Oh that IP address thing from where I posted in the past - yeah I changed isp is why the IP changed ;)

Well if that’s a concern, everyone asking for an account delete should get their password automatically reset and randomized. 🙃 Just in case. 

5 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I’ll bite. How can it be used maliciously?

BOOGMasterSoftball used to be a mod and deleted all his posts and ruined threads/chains. Most were restored with a database backup, but that's where the malicious angle comes into play when people can just up and leave and ruin threads (Is a thread from 8 years ago really relevant though? If someone replies, they're closed immediately). Or a user registers with the same name on purpose and confusion ensues.

 

What happens when a facebook user deactivates or deletes their account? Most of that material becomes inaccessible, yet Facebook doesn't grind to a stop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!