Recommended Posts

Have you noticed when some dumb Americans talk to British people, they like to throw in a jab like: ?we saved your ass in World War 2? - clearly an uneducated reference to the American involvement in WW2.

Lets just get some facts straight, AMERICA DID NOT SAVE OUR ARSES IN WW2! Ameronly got involved to make money. And Perl Harbour was allowed to get attacked to form a catalyst. The fact that America?s involvement appeared to ?save our asses? was merely a ?side effect?.

The fact is, after WW2, the UK was in debt to America and had to pay war repercussions and we didn?t finish off paying them back until 1996.

No doubt this debt had major influence with Tony Blair?s decision to allow our troops fighting in Bush?s war. I am sure Bush was willing to slash the debt somewhat if our soldiers died in Iraq and Afghanistan. While this may be an assumption, it?s not farfetched at all.

http://www.pair-annoyed.com:9090/CALMS-NEW...hp/t-22433.html

And the other fact, which is most startling, is that America did not save our arses in the war, they actually assisted the Nazis to kick it! Did you know that the Luftwaffe (that?s the Nazi air force, to the uneducated) required a special type of fuel that was only produced by America?

For the YouTube generation, you can learn more here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8OtmwmxWP4

This video will also teach you about the other crimes America had a hand in during WW2.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/635128-uks-ww2-debt-to-usa/
Share on other sites

You Tube as a source :laugh:

I don't even want to get involved in the subject of the thread, but I don't see a problem with YouTube being a source.

I could post a video of your face drunk if I knew you, or I could post something that passed on TV and write the source.

YouTube doesn't mean it's an unreliable source.

You sound like all the teachers I had in high school who told us never to use informations on the Internet because they were false.

Have you noticed when some dumb Americans talk to British people, they like to throw in a jab like: “we saved your ass in World War 2” - clearly an uneducated reference to the American involvement in WW2.

Lets just get some facts straight, AMERICA DID NOT SAVE OUR ARSES IN WW2! America only got involved to make money. And Perl Harbour was allowed to get attacked to form a catalyst. The fact that America’s involvement appeared to “save our asses” was merely a “side effect”.

The fact is, after WW2, the UK was in debt to America and had to pay war repercussions and we didn’t finish off paying them back until 1996.

No doubt this debt had major influence with Tony Blair’s decision to allow our troops fighting in Bush’s war. I am sure Bush was willing to slash the debt somewhat if our soldiers died in Iraq and Afghanistan. While this may be an assumption, it’s not farfetched at all.

http://www.pair-annoyed.com:9090/CALMS-NEW...hp/t-22433.html

And the other fact, which is most startling, is that America did not save our arses in the war, they actually assisted the Nazis to kick it! Did you know that the Luftwaffe (that’s the Nazi air force, to the uneducated) required a special type of fuel that was only produced by America?

For the YouTube generation, you can learn more here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8OtmwmxWP4

This video will also teach you about the other crimes America had a hand in during WW2.

You're talking about military equipment lent to Britain that they wanted to keep after the war was already over. It wasn't war repercussions, it was an agreement signed after the war, to keep that military equipment.

On the other hand, the US spend 13 billion dollars in helping rebuild Europe in the Marshall plan, 3 billion of which went to the UK. The UK never had to repay any of that $3 billion, they were just required to spend most of it in rebuilding their industry.

Before the war started, the Nazi regime had all sorts of business dealings with corporations in different countries, including Britain. Before the United States entered the war it was politically neutral so there was no embargo, and business dealings still continued. At the same time US corporations had business deals with the UK-- You can be sure Britain got some of its war supplies by purchases from US corporations. Same as when after the US entered the war, corporations in neutral countries like Switzerland still continued doing business with both the Axis and Allies. That's how things worked back then.

From what I understand, not all US corporations cut all involvement even when the US was at war, because they still had assets there, but did it through back channel ways because it wasn't permitted by the government.

All of this is in standard textbooks, btw, it was in my high school textbook. Before you look at noisy political documentaries with agendas, you should first read the whole history and background behind WWII. Then you can make up your mind how significant the facts are.

o for gods sake. i read the first sentence of this post. thats it.

when people say that, its meant to be taken as a joke, so take it as one. its as if you were in a bar and a buddy saves you from an ugly girl trying to get your attention all night, then that buddy says something later on like "c'mon man i just saved your ass back there".

Oh be serious! this is the worst case of trollitis I've ever seen!

If you want to have some self-loving patriotic rant about something that happened over half a century ago, and that has probably never affected you, and which you probably saw on that episode of the Simpsons, then go set up a specialised trolling BBS on freewebs or something, and pride yourself on creating the angriest place on earth. Hey, maybe people might even kill themselves listening to you and your band of about 3 other misfits discharging their Star Trek, testosterone and Red Bull fueled ranting, and then you could set up a secondary Samaritan-style category, where people can go to be rehabilitated after being exposed to your awful meaningless dirges

And Perl Harbour was allowed to get attacked to form a catalyst.

America did cause Pearl Harbor themselves by creating blockaids on the Japanese which prevented them importing food and fuel, but it's kind of a stretch to assume they allowed the attack itself. It was just a major cockup that's all.

Lets not forget IBM's involvement in keeping track of people in the concentration camps.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4MsTidMFYc

eh, Hitler took control of IBM Germany during that time. That hardly means the company as a whole helped the Nazi movement.

America did cause Pearl Harbor themselves by creating blockaids on the Japanese which prevented them importing food and fuel, but it's kind of a stretch to assume they allowed the attack itself. It was just a major cockup that's all.

Yea, but I don't think it makes sense to blame the US. It wasn't blockade btw, blockade means that you're blocking ports to prevent any foreign trade.

Japan had begun an expansionist military campaign in China, leading to many atrocities like Rape of Nanking. When they were condemned by the international community, Japan had withdrew from the League of Nations, the equivalent of the UN.

When Japan withdrew, thats when the US instituted an embargo on all oil and scrap metal shipments to Japan, because they didn't want to be supporting Japan's war effort. There was no embargo on food.

So its impossible to say it was America's fault.

Yea, but I don't think it makes sense to blame the US. It wasn't blockade btw, blockade means that you're blocking ports to prevent any foreign trade.

My understanding of the events were that the American navy actually had ships in the sea around Japan, not necessarily blocking the ports, but just sort of encircling the area.

lol this thread is so random... it's awful.

"And the other fact, which is most startling, is that America did not save our arses in the war, they actually assisted the Nazis to kick it! Did you know that the Luftwaffe (that?s the Nazi air force, to the uneducated) required a special type of fuel that was only produced by America?"

The luftwaffe is the name of the German Air Force...

kick it!

My understanding of the events were that the American navy actually had ships in the sea around Japan, not necessarily blocking the ports, but just sort of encircling the area.

I'm not sure how it was enforced, but the policy was an embargo of certain shipments from the US. A blockade would mean preventing Japan from doing any trading.

Learn some military History Soviet tanks were vastly superior to most of what the Nazi's were making and they were built on mass thus it would have only been a matter of time.

You're basing your opinion that the UK would have been unharmed on a large scale because the Soviets had better tanks and it was "only a matter of time"? :laugh: I thought the first post was laughable, but that is beyond laughable, just sad really. I don't think I would ever risk my countries wellbeing on "only a matter of time." I certainly glad that Winston Churchill didn't think like this or the UK would be speaking German.

You're basing your opinion that the UK would have been unharmed on a large scale because the Soviets had better tanks and it was "only a matter of time"? :laugh: I thought the first post was laughable, but that is beyond laughable, just sad really. I don't think I would ever risk my countries wellbeing on "only a matter of time." I certainly glad that Winston Churchill didn't think like this or the UK would be speaking German.

you don't get it do you the British isles was a fortress back then nothing could take the main land and by digging in the Nazis would have gotten bored and then started on the Soviets which would have lead to the whole Russian winter crippling the eastern front thus giving rise to the Do or die rush they did you're thinking too politically about the whole situation.

you don't get it do you the British isles was a fortress back then nothing could take the main land and by digging in the Nazis would have gotten bored and then started on the Soviets which would have lead to the whole Russian winter crippling the eastern front thus giving rise to the Do or die rush they did you're thinking too politically about the whole situation.

The Nazis would have gotten "bored"? They weren't playing Day of Defeat. And they wouldn't have "then" started on the Soviets, they were already fighting the Soviets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stalingrad.

You make it sound so easy. Why did the UK get involved at all if it was so easy? If the Nazis would have just gotten "bored" :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ImgDrive 2.2.7 by Razvan Serea ImgDrive is a CD/DVD/BD emulator - a tool that allows you to mount optical disc images by simply clicking on them in Windows Explorer. If you have downloaded an ISO image and want to use it without burning it to a blank disc, ImgDrive is the easiest way to do it. ImgDrive features: One-click mounting of iso, cue, nrg, mds/mdf, ccd, isz images Runs on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions Mount ape, flac, m4a, wav, wavpack, tta file as AUDIO CD (16-bit/44.1kHz) Mount a folder as DVD/BD Mount images in command line Does not require rebooting after installation Support up to 7 virtual drives at the same time Support multi session disc image (ccd/mds/nrg) A special portable version is available Translated to more than 10 languages Support File Type: .ccd - CloneCD image files .cue - Cue sheets files of ape/flac/m4a/tta/wav/wv/bin .iso - Standard ISO image files .isz - Compressed ISO image files .nrg - Nero image files .mds - Media descriptor image files ImgDrive 2.2.7 changelog: Added command line parameter to set number of drives Added AACS-Auth support for HD DVD Bumped kernel driver version to 2.2.7 Download: ImgDrive 2.2.7 | 692 KB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) Download: ImgDrive Portable 535 KB View: ImgDrive Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • AnyDesk 9.7.7 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just 7 megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.7.7 fixes: Fixed an issue that prevented users from creating meetings without an active license Download: AnyDesk 9.7.7 | 8.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I used a Pixel 10 Pro XL when it first came out for about 8 months. When I first got it, it was using Google assistant and that was fast, when asking it to call somone etc. Then it automatically switched with some update to Gemini. Doing even the simplist of things like asking it to call someone in my contacts was soooooo slow compared to Google assistant. I guess it had to go out to the cloud to do that? Back on iPhone and while Siri is dumb right now, it does do those simple things, like call someone, set a timer, star the stop watch etc, really fast. That an while I like Google Material Design 3 over iOS 26, they Pixel 10 Pro XL was so slow in comparison to the iPhone 17 Pro I am using.
    • I use Gemini in my rotation of AI clients...that work pays for. It is good at most things, better than copilot for imgage searching and making images, worse at writing vs Claude and way worse at hadling technical issues when it comes to Azure stuff. I also use YT premium and maps. Anything else Google is a pass for me. I have now seen multiple people locked out of their Google accounts for reasons that are just very vauge.
    • Microsoft is building an AI datacenter that "uses less water than a fast food restaurant" by Ivan Jenic Image: Microsoft Microsoft has announced plans to build a new datacenter campus in Pecos, Texas, as the company continues to invest billions in AI infrastructure. The new facility, called project Kilby, will reportedly have a capacity of 2 gigawatts and will be one of the largest single capacity additions in the company’s history. To power the campus, Microsoft signed a 20-year deal with Chevron to supply natural gas from the Permian Basin, America's largest oil field. This deal is set to become the largest collaboration to date between a U.S. oil and gas giant and Big Tech. It’s no secret that Big Tech has often been criticized for exploiting natural resources for its AI developments. Microsoft is trying to mitigate some of that negative consensus by promising to build its own power supply for the new datacenter, independent of the public grid. The Pecos datacenter will be powered by a power plant hub, built by Chevron, with up to 2.5 gigawatts of gas-fired capacity, with potential to scale to up to 5 gigawatts. The facility will include at least seven GE Vernova turbines, with first power potentially coming online as early as late 2027 or early 2028. The power plant hub is part of an approximately $7 billion investment by Chevron, making it one of the largest dedicated energy projects tied to a single datacenter campus in the U.S. Microsoft hasn’t publicly disclosed the amount it’s investing in the new datacenter. Microsoft has also committed to implementing a closed-loop cooling system that will only require an initial water charge to operate. The company said that “the total lifecycle water use of this datacenter is only a fraction of that consumed annually by a typical fast-food restaurant.” What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, or how a 20-year fossil fuel commitment squares with the company's pledge to be carbon negative by 2030. The construction of the new datacenter should provide over 6,000 construction jobs at peak build-out, and create hundreds of operational job roles once the facility is built. Via: Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!