Recommended Posts

Have you noticed when some dumb Americans talk to British people, they like to throw in a jab like: ?we saved your ass in World War 2? - clearly an uneducated reference to the American involvement in WW2.

I really don't like how people like you call Americans dumb. It's simply not true. Also, I've never heard anyone use your quote before. Pretty stupid IMO.

Lets just get some facts straight, AMERICA DID NOT SAVE OUR ARSES IN WW2! Ameronly got involved to make money. And Perl Harbour was allowed to get attacked to form a catalyst. The fact that America?s involvement appeared to ?save our asses? was merely a ?side effect?.

Umm... I'm pretty sure we entered the war because Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. Also, I'm sure that the fact that Germany was sinking US supply ships had something to do with it. After we formally went to war with Japan, Italy and Germany declared war on us. And to further disprove you, by 1945 the US h$42 billion42 billion to British and French troops. Quite to opposite of what you claim.

Welcome to Neowin, where even the mods feed the trolls with flamebait.

Let me correct you:

"Welcome to Neowin, where even the mods can voice their opinions."

looking back, the US does not get on too well when it enters a war alone, i.e. vietnam

Well that’s a bull**** point too, the French, British and Australians were also involved in the Vietnam war.

Let me correct you:

"Welcome to Neowin, where even the mods can voice their opinions."

Stating an opinion and saying you want to see any country ravaged by war just to get a rise out of people are two completely different things. I would have expected more from a mod.

The problem with this whole thread is 90% of the people posting don’t know enough about the subject to be able to discuss it properly. Most just post because they want to upset people or because they just like to be ass holes.

Well that?s a bull**** point too, the French, British and Australians were also involved in the Vietnam war.

Stating an opinion and saying you want to see any country ravaged by war just to get a rise out of people are two completely different things. I would have expected more from a mod.

The problem with this whole thread is 90% of the people posting don?t know enough about the subject to be able to discuss it properly. Most just post because they want to upset people or because they just like to be ass holes.

The French were in Vietnam for 100 years.

Stating an opinion and saying you want to see any country ravaged by war just to get a rise out of people are two completely different things. I would have expected more from a mod.

The problem with this whole thread is 90% of the people posting don?t know enough about the subject to be able to discuss it properly. Most just post because they want to upset people or because they just like to be ass holes.

I scan the forums regularly and post rarely since most threads here usually get some good advice or replies quickly, but 6 pages its taken to get to someone who can point out whats going on.

Didnt take an awful lot of History myself but my "Lies to Children" education pointed to the following as the reasons Britain survived invasion.

1. Hitler turning from bombing airfields to carpet bombing cities, allowing the RAF time to regroup and redeploy with foreign pilots, mostly Poles i believe.

2. The invention and deployment of radar,

3. The transformation in role of the Luftwaffe from aerial support of ground attacks to carrying the attack alone

4. The decryption of enigma, something else the poles had a hand in I believe, though a machine was later captured by the British.

5. America entering the war.

Those all point to Hitlers impatience and arrogance as the reason we survived as a nation, and if any nation helped i was led to believe the Polish lent the greater help.

For winning the war then yes the US involvement was vital, supplying the manpower and extra aircaft necessary to pound and push Nazi-Germany into retreat and eventually defeat.

But come to our aid???? Save our A**es??? I dont think so, it was more a case of the US realising after the Pearl bombing that the European war would not pass them by and that they would themselves face battle on two fronts If we eventually did fall.

So to all our Grandfathers I say thanks, and to any individual who claims victory for his countries part GROW UP! It was a world war and all nations made their sacrifices and had their victories, and of all things most certain.... One Country did not win alone!

I scan the forums regularly and post rarely since most threads here usually get some good advice or replies quickly, but 6 pages its taken to get to someone who can point out whats going on.

Didnt take an awful lot of History myself but my "Lies to Children" education pointed to the following as the reasons Britain survived invasion.

1. Hitler turning from bombing airfields to carpet bombing cities, allowing the RAF time to regroup and redeploy with foreign pilots, mostly Poles i believe.

2. The invention and deployment of radar,

3. The transformation in role of the Luftwaffe from aerial support of ground attacks to carrying the attack alone

4. The decryption of enigma, something else the poles had a hand in I believe, though a machine was later captured by the British.

5. America entering the war.

Those all point to Hitlers impatience and arrogance as the reason we survived as a nation, and if any nation helped i was led to believe the Polish lent the greater help.

For winning the war then yes the US involvement was vital, supplying the manpower and extra aircaft necessary to pound and push Nazi-Germany into retreat and eventually defeat.

But come to our aid???? Save our A**es??? I dont think so, it was more a case of the US realising after the Pearl bombing that the European war would not pass them by and that they would themselves face battle on two fronts If we eventually did fall.

So to all our Grandfathers I say thanks, and to any individual who claims victory for his countries part GROW UP! It was a world war and all nations made their sacrifices and had their victories, and of all things most certain.... One Country did not win alone!

QFT!!!

It was a team effort essentially.

edit: I just want to bring up the film U571, which was an unnecessary Americanisation of a huge British victory in the Battle of the Atlantic. I think its this attitude that many of us, especially us brits, will regret, as it does a disservice to the men involved and the Royal Navy.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been appalled by the comments made from both sides of the atlantic. It's called a world war for a reason!

USA did enter and was right to enter, they saw it as a time to become a global leader and take over from the British Empire.

The main problem I see if UK was invaded what would have happend to british empire, would we have dumped it and moved all people back to the UK? or would we have mearly given it to the nazis to make sure we were not taken?

Everyone joined in the war because in one way or another, their own future would be at risk. Look at the global market today, could you see the likes of china, america and europe working together on projects like now days? Probably not!

America needed to join in as it saw the western part of europe as a leader of the world, it would have given the nazis a big platform of resourses and people to launch more conflicts to take over the world. They had already taken chunks of europe and had allies, America could not afford to loose such countries which it could work with and get along. It would have meant a small section of friends. Thus leaving it a target. Nowdays you find countries don't start fight because the UN or Nato can come in.

You will also find that with huge numbers of your army tends to become less technological advanced and less skilled. With the empire you could use your less skilled soldiers to fight the smaller countries that were to be taken over. Nowdays we have a small base of skilled soliders. Such as your Seals or SAS etc etc each section has a purpose in the type of combat they delt with, where as in the old days I believe it wasn't so. It extends to the type of tools the armed forces get, such as people do not see the need for such huge fleets of ships considering the current global issue of terrorism. And again friends, we have friends which we can launch attacks from.

Also about this debt, yeah sure there was/is debt, but which country doesn't have debt to another country?

Thats my view anyway

Tonylock this is the dumbest and the most false thread ever read by me in my whole life.

Grow up mate,and yes U.S was part of the "Saving your ass part",Enlgand recieved innumerable weapons and technology from the U.S in the pre-involvment and post-involvement stages of the WW2.Without americans supply,england was lost and probably surrendered .

You know why europe is in debt with America,have you heard about the Marshall plan? who reconstructed europe eh? with what money? Go ask Americas bankers the have the perfect answer for you.

Go play at the park this isn't for you.

Edited by EduardValencia

I didn't read much of the mumbo-jumbo that entailed past about page 2... but I really have to thank some higher power that didn't put any of us posters in any position of power.

We're friends, allies, people of a similar perspective. So why in hell do we have to bicker about who did what, why, when and where? It makes no difference. We do things to support each other and that's all that should matter. We're as far from corrupt as some places on this earth as we could possibly be, so rejoice in that notion, no?

I didn't read much of the mumbo-jumbo that entailed past about page 2... but I really have to thank some higher power that didn't put any of us posters in any position of power.

We're friends, allies, people of a similar perspective. So why in hell do we have to bicker about who did what, why, when and where? It makes no difference. We do things to support each other and that's all that should matter. We're as far from corrupt as some places on this earth as we could possibly be, so rejoice in that notion, no?

Duly noted,excellent post.

Blind patriotism leads to individuals who happen to live in one land to always act as if they're insulted when someone comments negatively about their country...

It's such a tragedy to see people associate their beliefs with the country they live in. It's even worse when all of you, who are fighting over each country's "image", are disrespecting the millions of soldiers and innocent civilians who died because of stupid, selfish leaders by acting as if you know the history from cover to cover just because you picked up a history book and could cite figures.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!