Recommended Posts

I bought GTA4 and switched back to San Andreas

:laugh:

You did too? I couldn't stand how every time I put the disc in, it kept asking me if I was sure if I wanted to play. Or when I tried to press Start, a stupid dialogue box popped up saying Cancel or Allow. :p

You know as well as I do that Microsoft isn't gonna do that. No company does it unless the numbers are ridiculously high. Apple hasn't said much since Leopard's release (one weekend's sales only); it's actually surprising that Microsoft has bothered to release Vista sales numbers three times. I guess they're just trying to prove that it isn't the failure the media is saying it is.

Very possibly. Apple hates releasing any numbers, though I'm surprised they don't leak more often since they are quite easy to find internally if you know the right people.

Take this with a grain of salt since you don't know where I am getting these numbers from and I'm not going to offer that up but Leopard sales are ranging around the rough 70/30 range. 70% New Hardware Sales, 30% Retail Box / Family Pack / VL sales which is quite normal for Apple.

my hp laptop, which came with vista home premium went for repairs for what i thought was a hard drive problem.

well the laptop came back, but with xp home installed on it. I have never been so happy in my life.

but good for microsoft, i prefer windows over any other operating system, and I have tried osx and linux. but I prefer choice as to which windows to have on my laptop.

my hp laptop, which came with vista home premium went for repairs for what i thought was a hard drive problem.

well the laptop came back, but with xp home installed on it. I have never been so happy in my life.

but good for microsoft, i prefer windows over any other operating system, and I have tried osx and linux. but I prefer choice as to which windows to have on my laptop.

I would be absolutely livid if that happened to me, as well as making a rather large complaint to HP.

I dead sure they are losing more money due to piracy's than the profit they are having .

Maby theyll pull vista off the market...(but not off torrents sites prob)

and stop selling vista............. :woot:

I actually love vista I get better battery life in it

my hp laptop, which came with vista home premium went for repairs for what i thought was a hard drive problem.

well the laptop came back, but with xp home installed on it. I have never been so happy in my life.

Wow.

If underlined is really true, that's pretty sad actually. Get out more I guess?

So what? These sales figures fail to disclose how many of those 140 million copies are still in use, especially since quite a few people went back to XP.

They do not disclose how many pirated copies as well, I bit it'll be much much more than 140 million :D :p

Vista = win (Y).

Heh. That's not to mention that the consumer doesn't even have to do anything except check the box to participate in the Customer Experience Program - it does all the reporting by itself.

And it's more than bug testing - it's usage tracking so they can see what things they need to focus on when they build newer versions. I'm willing to bet that 'ribbons' in Office 2007 came somewhat out of data from CEP, and that's been pretty well received by just about everyone.

-Spenser

You're correct. The development team said they studied thousands of sessions that were generated by the CEP, and that showed them that people couldn't find the features they were looking for. That's why they developed the Ribbon.

LOL, that's not what the point of that topic is.

it's like saying GTA4 sold 1,000,000 copies, but how many people actually play it...

answer is, Who cares. They bought it, they can do what they want with it

But lylesback2, you're forgetting that with GTA4, consumers bought the game voluntarily.

With Vista, most of those sales were from computers with Vista built in and while business customers can easily opt for XP, the average consumer has no choice but to get the computer pre-loaded with Vista, which translates into a sale of Vista, even if the consumer decided to downgrade to XP a few hours later. Henceforth, that explains why I would take the Vista sales claim with a grain of salt. Instead, one should focus on how many of those sales were from actually purchasing Vista, full version or upgrade, and that should be the key to determine how many consumers upgraded to Vista voluntarily without pirating the OS.

^^^MS isn't focusing on how many upgraded though - why would they? They get money from all those 'forced' to get it built in too. They care about where the money comes from, not how many people actually care. It might be interesting to you or others here on tech sites how many people upgraded, and specific breakdowns and whatnot, but that doesn't really matter at all to MS.

I think you'll find you're being ignorant of the situation if you think more people than not hate Vista because it's just not true.

-Spenser

I think you'll find you're being ignorant of the situation if you think more people than not hate Vista because it's just not true.

Actually, with all due respect, I find that comment ignorant as it is purely subjective without concrete user satisfaction data to base the statement on.

Now if Microsoft could come back and say out of the 140 million SHIPPED copies of Vista, that they have individually surveyed each user that received Vista on their computer (or the ones who upgraded) and received a 50+ prefers it to their previous OS review, then we could say more people like Vista than don't. :)

Until data like that is available, which I don't think it ever will be, it's hard to say how many people like Vista versus hate it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!