Recommended Posts

Yes, my statement is subjective, since there aren't any real numbers out there, but I guarantee it's true. If it weren't, Vista would actually be a failure, and Microsoft would be seeing more of a backlash than the slap-on-the-wrist it's getting from niche tech websites like this one where the people who post on these forums think they're somehow representative of the actual market.

I'm not trying to be naive or ignorant, just realistic.

-Spenser

Yes, my statement is subjective, since there aren't any real numbers out there, but I guarantee it's true. If it weren't, Vista would actually be a failure, and Microsoft would be seeing more of a backlash than the slap-on-the-wrist it's getting from niche tech websites like this one where the people who post on these forums think they're somehow representative of the actual market.

I'm not trying to be naive or ignorant, just realistic.

-Spenser

The question that I pose to you about those Niche sites is do those include or not include the Fortune 500 Companies that refuse to even consider Vista and are sticking with XP? I can not name names due to confidentiality agreements, however I can tell you out of all the companies I've been to recently (Some very big names) only one of them has adopted vista (1 out of 15) and that was due to Microsoft giving them an engineer, ON SITE, to handle their migration and training of help-desk staff.

To me that isn't a glowing review when the large companies, of which have the Microsoft VL Agreements, refuse to adopt the 'new' technology in Vista...

The question that I pose to you about those Niche sites is do those include or not include the Fortune 500 Companies that refuse to even consider Vista and are sticking with XP? I can not name names due to confidentiality agreements, however I can tell you out of all the companies I've been to recently (Some very big names) only one of them has adopted vista (1 out of 15) and that was due to Microsoft giving them an engineer, ON SITE, to handle their migration and training of help-desk staff.

To me that isn't a glowing review when the large companies, of which have the Microsoft VL Agreements, refuse to adopt the 'new' technology in Vista...

Companies won't upgrade if there is no reason to ugprade. Fortune 500 companies probably have thousands of computers, why upgrade when XP suits their purpose?

That said, Vista is not a failure and it is a whole lot better than XP. But from a work point of view, [ie most office work involves some guy typing reports/excel spreadsheets/checking email or browsing sites] do not need vista..and hence XP does the job.

That also said, half the people in this world are retarded when it comes to computers anyways...they complain because something they were trained like a robot to do and followed for like 5 years got moved/changed/renamed..and they lack the brains to spend 5 seconds finding out what happenned to it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good move IMHO no matter who is running the administration. We need checks and balances on this stuff especially concerning bleeding edge models. China and others that depend greatly on stolen IP will weaponize it ASAP if they get access. The same effort needs to be applied by the SEC concerning all of this circular funding of AI companies and BS financial reporting as well.
    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!