MS: Sony has failed to deliver on promises


Recommended Posts

It's amusing to see the quick Sony defense in this thread. I'm not sure what you're defending though, this guy is pretty much spot-on in everything he said.

I don't know about you, but I don't think it's okay to promise some amazing new feature or whatever and expect people to wait for years on end. Their competition has already been there for years now on many of those items. What is the hold up?

Nobody is defending the delays.

What?

The only delays consumers experience are ones that affect us after release/purchase.

How am I affected by any delay prior to the launch of the PS3 unless the actual launch itself is delayed? :/

And if you're going to comment on them launching last/not first, they did so with the PS1 (Saturn) and the PS2 (Dreamcast) as well.

You're really grasping at straws with that comment I think.

What? :wacko: I am not grasping any straws, but just pointing that what MS saying here might be borderline rhetoric but you can't deny that it is 100% truth.

Sony's history of delays with ps3 is well known and probably well documented on Neowin as well :rofl: . Who gives a **** about consumer experience...gamers who wanted to play ps3 had to wait because of the delay and then even after it came out, it had many things lacking from what was promised by sony or more particularly ken kutaragi.

I did not wish to point at who launched first or whatever...don't know how you got that impression.

Oh great - the boys are back to their old "finger pointing" and "bad mouhing" tricks again. Sone did it, now MS are doing it.

Who gives a damn? You only stoop to such levels when you run out of ideas how to market your own console!

I think you'll find you're wrong, as I doubt MS is out of ideas in the marketing sector. He's not badmouthing per se, he's pointing out a bunch of things that happen to be true.

-Spenser

It's amusing to see the quick Sony defense in this thread. I'm not sure what you're defending though, this guy is pretty much spot-on in everything he said.

I don't know about you, but I don't think it's okay to promise some amazing new feature or whatever and expect people to wait for years on end. Their competition has already been there for years now on many of those items. What is the hold up?

Putting "everyone" into either one of these categories

a) Sony Defence

or

b) Sony critics who agree will all

Is a little shallow.

Many of us will realise what is being poked at here, however we don't necessarily have to share the ruthless view on offer.

I don't think you can defend a delay as such - Well if something isn't ready it needs a delay, I mean if Home launched and it underwhelmed, what would be worse for Sony?

Everyone attacking the service, or some grumbles and moans about a delay to make it better?

However any delay, is going to frustrate, since if a date is put down you have faith in that date - If date's keep getting changed, you begin to lose faith. DNF theory :laugh:

Time is in their favour (Sony), which is why I don't feel the need to be as hostile towards them this early. As time ticks on, my view will change - And I mean TICK ON, 1 year into a 10 year cycle as I said above, isn't disastrous in light of how the console is actually selling, and the features we do have on our plates.

Some of you make it sound like the PS3 can't operate just now due to what's missing - It can operate just fine, just not to it's full potential yet.

And I now know everyone is going to say "but when will it hit it's full potential?!!?" - I don't know, I guess you could say the target of full potential is always one you'll be chasing as you're always looking to improve, but to stick with this topic, I believe Sony need to roll out the bulk of what's still missing in 2008, and perfect any niggles by mid-2009 and I think they will.

Edited by Audioboxer
Seems this post is full of the 'usual' bunch.

360 FTW. Its the bestest console ever. Sony sucks. 360 fanboys win (what? No idea).

If you don't like what you see, you can feel free to leave at any time. We're not stopping you, nor would we be sad to see you go.

-Spenser

Some of you make it sound like the PS3 can't operate just now due to what's missing - It can operate just fine, just not to it's full potential yet.

At least me (and probably magik/strifler6478/HawkMan too) are making a point that MS isn't necessarily lying here..badmouthing yes...but what they are saying is correct.

What matters is where you're at at the end of the race - Sony harp on about their 10 year cycle, and so far they're the only ones who do so, and the only ones who have kept to it for each generation (PS2 is nearing 10 years now).

I don't see a 10 year cycle as a plus and theres other that believe such a strategy only holds Sony back. I think five or six years is fine for a console release, maybe seven tops but look how far systems have come in two decades and I think it's not really that great a move to aim for overly long cycles on a single platform. If they had dampened PS2 sales earlier then perhaps the PS3 would be in a better position now. Not saying it's in a bad position, but given the fact theres few exclusives on there currently it may have been better for some of the better titles such as the God of War sequal or whatever to have come out a bit later but hit the PS3 instead.

Anyway just thinking about that 10 year cycle. Doom 1 isnt even 20 years old so I'd hate to think Sony has plans to realistically support consoles for a full ten years. I know that doesnt mean they will release on every ten years but rather will support them with titles ect into the generation after, but still it's too long in this industry.

At least me (and probably magik/strifler6478/HawkMan too) are making a point that MS isn't necessarily lying here..badmouthing yes...but what they are saying is correct.

It's pretty obvious they aren't "lying" as such, so what we're really discussing is how big an impact this has made for Sony so far, and how much of an impact could it make if things don't change.

That is where most of the debating is done.

If you don't like what you see, you can feel free to leave at any time. We're not stopping you, nor would we be sad to see you go.

-Spenser

Getting personal for laughs now, eh? I will stay as long as I want, and take part. As far as I was aware the rules stated no flamebaiting, trolling and personal attacks? Seems to me you are guilty of at least 2 of those (not just in this thread).

I think that (as per usual) you are jumping on the 'hate Sony' bandwagon with no good reason. I find it quite pathetic if I'm being honest.

You clearly dont like the PS3 and Sony yet are compelled to post in the Sony section, why? Flamebaiting per chance?

19 Million Xbox 360 and 13 Million Playstation 3 is the most current numbers.

That then makes the gap 6 million, and MS are reporting 5 million in this recent article - That is what is causing the confusion.

Someone is wrong.

Doesnt this article itself really only lend itself to fanboys?

I mean I only just recently purchased a console.

I began with a near certainty of purchase a 360 and ended up with a PS3 for a variety of reasons.

Now im pretty technologically minded and keep up to date on tech news and I didnt know and couldn't have cared less about what Sony promised or whats coming. What's coming in terms of games and whats in the box right then and there in the store is what counts for me.

The point being regular consumers, much like myself, won't know/care what was promised or meant to be, it all comes down to the usual, value for money, hardware, uses and personal preferences etc.

That then makes the gap 6 million, and MS are reporting 5 million in this recent article - That is what is causing the confusion.

Someone is wrong.

May be the 5million is an approximation?

Seems this post is full of the 'usual' bunch.

360 FTW. Its the bestest console ever. Sony sucks. 360 fanboys win (what? No idea).

Dude, just stop it. Saying (or even better, admitting) Sony f***** up when it comes to over promising has nothing to do with the competition.

It looks like you have some issues with either Microsoft or the 360 itself.

I don't see a 10 year cycle as a plus and theres other that believe such a strategy only holds Sony back. I think five or six years is fine for a console release, maybe seven tops but look how far systems have come in two decades and I think it's not really that great a move to aim for overly long cycles on a single platform. If they had dampened PS2 sales earlier then perhaps the PS3 would be in a better position now. Not saying it's in a bad position, but given the fact theres few exclusives on there currently it may have been better for some of the better titles such as the God of War sequal or whatever to have come out a bit later but hit the PS3 instead.

Anyway just thinking about that 10 year cycle. Doom 1 isnt even 20 years old so I'd hate to think Sony has plans to realistically support consoles for a full ten years. I know that doesnt mean they will release on every ten years but rather will support them with titles ect into the generation after, but still it's too long in this industry.

What happens is Sony have released the next console 5 years into the lifespan, but continued to support the old one for 10 years.

PS2 came out 5 years into PS1's life, PS3 came out 5 years into PS2's life.

It's the perfect setup, it's a fact not everyone jumps ship to the next console right away - I mean there is 127 million PS2 owners just now, taking the Wii, 360 AND PS3, we're not even at 127 million., quite far off infact.

What you don't want is a new console coming out, and support for your old console going right down the pan almost instantly.

I can see no wrong in having a 10 year life cycle, in terms of ambition and actually carrying out the plan.

Getting personal for laughs now, eh? I will stay as long as I want, and take part. As far as I was aware the rules stated no flamebaiting, trolling and personal attacks? Seems to me you are guilty of at least 2 of those (not just in this thread).

I think that (as per usual) you are jumping on the 'hate Sony' bandwagon with no good reason. I find it quite pathetic if I'm being honest.

You clearly dont like the PS3 and Sony yet are compelled to post in the Sony section, why? Flamebaiting per chance?

I've done neither and you shouldn't start accusing people of it. It's not a personal attack - nobody would be sad to see you (or most other people) go. It's just the internet. And I don't hate Sony. They're a fine company, but they've failed on so many promises that it's hard to care about them. Not to mention I'm more than happy with my 360. I have played the PS3 and it's a fun machine, but not worth my money.

You staying here is fine, but if you choose to do so, knowing the situation, than there's no reason for you to be complaining about it, as it's always been that way. You're the only one flamebaiting here because you're the only one being accusatory of other people here.

I know the rules here like the back of my hand. You weren't around for the debacle in December where a bunch of us prominent posters who post far more relevantly than you have were restricted for two weeks. I know the limits, and perhaps I'm pushing them, but again, it's just the internet.

-Spenser

Dude, just stop it. Saying (or even better, admitting) Sony f***** up when it comes to over promising has nothing to do with the competition.

It looks like you have some issues with either Microsoft or the 360 itself.

Sony have promised things and not delivered, not once has anybody (myself included) said otherwise.

I own a 360, and many, many Microsoft products. I have no issues with them (apart from the 6 360's that have broken on me!). I just don't see why so many people jump onto the 'hate Sony' bandwagon.

May be the 5million is an approximation?

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

Audio..that reasoning is just plain stupid...

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

Seriously Audio, that has to be the most pathetic point I've seen you argue on Neowin to date :laugh:

Doesnt this article itself really only lend itself to fanboys?

I mean I only just recently purchased a console.

I began with a near certainty of purchase a 360 and ended up with a PS3 for a variety of reasons.

Now im pretty technologically minded and keep up to date on tech news and I didnt know and couldn't have cared less about what Sony promised or whats coming. What's coming in terms of games and whats in the box right then and there in the store is what counts for me.

The point being regular consumers, much like myself, won't know/care what was promised or meant to be, it all comes down to the usual, value for money, hardware, uses and personal preferences etc.

The article is showing the nitty gritty world of competition these corporations are taking part in, and it also shows why the gaming world right now is a very hostile place.

While things said in these articles hold truths, they way they are usually put across ensures they come across as smack talk to the group/supporters they are pointed at, and to those backing the article, it seems like cold hard truth.

It's a shame the thread is going down the pan again, I just hope the mods can see everything I've posted is respectful, and everyone who has replied to me, is just having a debate/conversation - I've not felt victimized or hard done at all in here.

Seriously Audio, that has to be the most pathetic point I've seen you argue on Neowin to date :laugh:

Well what does 5million mean?

It means 5 million to me, therefore if MS have sold 19, Sony have sold 14.

If it doesn't add up like that, SOMEONE isn't telling the truth.

I said clearly WHY I brought up the 5mil issue, and that is because over the web right now we've seen claims of a 6mil+ gap, sometimes more - MS have now said it's 5, so that is more credible than all the estimates we have on places like VGChartz (Their gap is 6.5 mil).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!