MS: Sony has failed to deliver on promises


Recommended Posts

It's amusing to see the quick Sony defense in this thread. I'm not sure what you're defending though, this guy is pretty much spot-on in everything he said.

I don't know about you, but I don't think it's okay to promise some amazing new feature or whatever and expect people to wait for years on end. Their competition has already been there for years now on many of those items. What is the hold up?

Nobody is defending the delays.

What?

The only delays consumers experience are ones that affect us after release/purchase.

How am I affected by any delay prior to the launch of the PS3 unless the actual launch itself is delayed? :/

And if you're going to comment on them launching last/not first, they did so with the PS1 (Saturn) and the PS2 (Dreamcast) as well.

You're really grasping at straws with that comment I think.

What? :wacko: I am not grasping any straws, but just pointing that what MS saying here might be borderline rhetoric but you can't deny that it is 100% truth.

Sony's history of delays with ps3 is well known and probably well documented on Neowin as well :rofl: . Who gives a **** about consumer experience...gamers who wanted to play ps3 had to wait because of the delay and then even after it came out, it had many things lacking from what was promised by sony or more particularly ken kutaragi.

I did not wish to point at who launched first or whatever...don't know how you got that impression.

Oh great - the boys are back to their old "finger pointing" and "bad mouhing" tricks again. Sone did it, now MS are doing it.

Who gives a damn? You only stoop to such levels when you run out of ideas how to market your own console!

I think you'll find you're wrong, as I doubt MS is out of ideas in the marketing sector. He's not badmouthing per se, he's pointing out a bunch of things that happen to be true.

-Spenser

It's amusing to see the quick Sony defense in this thread. I'm not sure what you're defending though, this guy is pretty much spot-on in everything he said.

I don't know about you, but I don't think it's okay to promise some amazing new feature or whatever and expect people to wait for years on end. Their competition has already been there for years now on many of those items. What is the hold up?

Putting "everyone" into either one of these categories

a) Sony Defence

or

b) Sony critics who agree will all

Is a little shallow.

Many of us will realise what is being poked at here, however we don't necessarily have to share the ruthless view on offer.

I don't think you can defend a delay as such - Well if something isn't ready it needs a delay, I mean if Home launched and it underwhelmed, what would be worse for Sony?

Everyone attacking the service, or some grumbles and moans about a delay to make it better?

However any delay, is going to frustrate, since if a date is put down you have faith in that date - If date's keep getting changed, you begin to lose faith. DNF theory :laugh:

Time is in their favour (Sony), which is why I don't feel the need to be as hostile towards them this early. As time ticks on, my view will change - And I mean TICK ON, 1 year into a 10 year cycle as I said above, isn't disastrous in light of how the console is actually selling, and the features we do have on our plates.

Some of you make it sound like the PS3 can't operate just now due to what's missing - It can operate just fine, just not to it's full potential yet.

And I now know everyone is going to say "but when will it hit it's full potential?!!?" - I don't know, I guess you could say the target of full potential is always one you'll be chasing as you're always looking to improve, but to stick with this topic, I believe Sony need to roll out the bulk of what's still missing in 2008, and perfect any niggles by mid-2009 and I think they will.

Edited by Audioboxer
Seems this post is full of the 'usual' bunch.

360 FTW. Its the bestest console ever. Sony sucks. 360 fanboys win (what? No idea).

If you don't like what you see, you can feel free to leave at any time. We're not stopping you, nor would we be sad to see you go.

-Spenser

Some of you make it sound like the PS3 can't operate just now due to what's missing - It can operate just fine, just not to it's full potential yet.

At least me (and probably magik/strifler6478/HawkMan too) are making a point that MS isn't necessarily lying here..badmouthing yes...but what they are saying is correct.

What matters is where you're at at the end of the race - Sony harp on about their 10 year cycle, and so far they're the only ones who do so, and the only ones who have kept to it for each generation (PS2 is nearing 10 years now).

I don't see a 10 year cycle as a plus and theres other that believe such a strategy only holds Sony back. I think five or six years is fine for a console release, maybe seven tops but look how far systems have come in two decades and I think it's not really that great a move to aim for overly long cycles on a single platform. If they had dampened PS2 sales earlier then perhaps the PS3 would be in a better position now. Not saying it's in a bad position, but given the fact theres few exclusives on there currently it may have been better for some of the better titles such as the God of War sequal or whatever to have come out a bit later but hit the PS3 instead.

Anyway just thinking about that 10 year cycle. Doom 1 isnt even 20 years old so I'd hate to think Sony has plans to realistically support consoles for a full ten years. I know that doesnt mean they will release on every ten years but rather will support them with titles ect into the generation after, but still it's too long in this industry.

At least me (and probably magik/strifler6478/HawkMan too) are making a point that MS isn't necessarily lying here..badmouthing yes...but what they are saying is correct.

It's pretty obvious they aren't "lying" as such, so what we're really discussing is how big an impact this has made for Sony so far, and how much of an impact could it make if things don't change.

That is where most of the debating is done.

If you don't like what you see, you can feel free to leave at any time. We're not stopping you, nor would we be sad to see you go.

-Spenser

Getting personal for laughs now, eh? I will stay as long as I want, and take part. As far as I was aware the rules stated no flamebaiting, trolling and personal attacks? Seems to me you are guilty of at least 2 of those (not just in this thread).

I think that (as per usual) you are jumping on the 'hate Sony' bandwagon with no good reason. I find it quite pathetic if I'm being honest.

You clearly dont like the PS3 and Sony yet are compelled to post in the Sony section, why? Flamebaiting per chance?

19 Million Xbox 360 and 13 Million Playstation 3 is the most current numbers.

That then makes the gap 6 million, and MS are reporting 5 million in this recent article - That is what is causing the confusion.

Someone is wrong.

Doesnt this article itself really only lend itself to fanboys?

I mean I only just recently purchased a console.

I began with a near certainty of purchase a 360 and ended up with a PS3 for a variety of reasons.

Now im pretty technologically minded and keep up to date on tech news and I didnt know and couldn't have cared less about what Sony promised or whats coming. What's coming in terms of games and whats in the box right then and there in the store is what counts for me.

The point being regular consumers, much like myself, won't know/care what was promised or meant to be, it all comes down to the usual, value for money, hardware, uses and personal preferences etc.

That then makes the gap 6 million, and MS are reporting 5 million in this recent article - That is what is causing the confusion.

Someone is wrong.

May be the 5million is an approximation?

Seems this post is full of the 'usual' bunch.

360 FTW. Its the bestest console ever. Sony sucks. 360 fanboys win (what? No idea).

Dude, just stop it. Saying (or even better, admitting) Sony f***** up when it comes to over promising has nothing to do with the competition.

It looks like you have some issues with either Microsoft or the 360 itself.

I don't see a 10 year cycle as a plus and theres other that believe such a strategy only holds Sony back. I think five or six years is fine for a console release, maybe seven tops but look how far systems have come in two decades and I think it's not really that great a move to aim for overly long cycles on a single platform. If they had dampened PS2 sales earlier then perhaps the PS3 would be in a better position now. Not saying it's in a bad position, but given the fact theres few exclusives on there currently it may have been better for some of the better titles such as the God of War sequal or whatever to have come out a bit later but hit the PS3 instead.

Anyway just thinking about that 10 year cycle. Doom 1 isnt even 20 years old so I'd hate to think Sony has plans to realistically support consoles for a full ten years. I know that doesnt mean they will release on every ten years but rather will support them with titles ect into the generation after, but still it's too long in this industry.

What happens is Sony have released the next console 5 years into the lifespan, but continued to support the old one for 10 years.

PS2 came out 5 years into PS1's life, PS3 came out 5 years into PS2's life.

It's the perfect setup, it's a fact not everyone jumps ship to the next console right away - I mean there is 127 million PS2 owners just now, taking the Wii, 360 AND PS3, we're not even at 127 million., quite far off infact.

What you don't want is a new console coming out, and support for your old console going right down the pan almost instantly.

I can see no wrong in having a 10 year life cycle, in terms of ambition and actually carrying out the plan.

Getting personal for laughs now, eh? I will stay as long as I want, and take part. As far as I was aware the rules stated no flamebaiting, trolling and personal attacks? Seems to me you are guilty of at least 2 of those (not just in this thread).

I think that (as per usual) you are jumping on the 'hate Sony' bandwagon with no good reason. I find it quite pathetic if I'm being honest.

You clearly dont like the PS3 and Sony yet are compelled to post in the Sony section, why? Flamebaiting per chance?

I've done neither and you shouldn't start accusing people of it. It's not a personal attack - nobody would be sad to see you (or most other people) go. It's just the internet. And I don't hate Sony. They're a fine company, but they've failed on so many promises that it's hard to care about them. Not to mention I'm more than happy with my 360. I have played the PS3 and it's a fun machine, but not worth my money.

You staying here is fine, but if you choose to do so, knowing the situation, than there's no reason for you to be complaining about it, as it's always been that way. You're the only one flamebaiting here because you're the only one being accusatory of other people here.

I know the rules here like the back of my hand. You weren't around for the debacle in December where a bunch of us prominent posters who post far more relevantly than you have were restricted for two weeks. I know the limits, and perhaps I'm pushing them, but again, it's just the internet.

-Spenser

Dude, just stop it. Saying (or even better, admitting) Sony f***** up when it comes to over promising has nothing to do with the competition.

It looks like you have some issues with either Microsoft or the 360 itself.

Sony have promised things and not delivered, not once has anybody (myself included) said otherwise.

I own a 360, and many, many Microsoft products. I have no issues with them (apart from the 6 360's that have broken on me!). I just don't see why so many people jump onto the 'hate Sony' bandwagon.

May be the 5million is an approximation?

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

Audio..that reasoning is just plain stupid...

You're guessing that it's an appox figure then, there is no indication at it being approx 5 million in the article - He clearly says 5, not around 5, just over 5, or just under 5.

Obviously in terms of the EXACT figure, I doubt it was 5,000,000 at the time of the article.

Seriously Audio, that has to be the most pathetic point I've seen you argue on Neowin to date :laugh:

Doesnt this article itself really only lend itself to fanboys?

I mean I only just recently purchased a console.

I began with a near certainty of purchase a 360 and ended up with a PS3 for a variety of reasons.

Now im pretty technologically minded and keep up to date on tech news and I didnt know and couldn't have cared less about what Sony promised or whats coming. What's coming in terms of games and whats in the box right then and there in the store is what counts for me.

The point being regular consumers, much like myself, won't know/care what was promised or meant to be, it all comes down to the usual, value for money, hardware, uses and personal preferences etc.

The article is showing the nitty gritty world of competition these corporations are taking part in, and it also shows why the gaming world right now is a very hostile place.

While things said in these articles hold truths, they way they are usually put across ensures they come across as smack talk to the group/supporters they are pointed at, and to those backing the article, it seems like cold hard truth.

It's a shame the thread is going down the pan again, I just hope the mods can see everything I've posted is respectful, and everyone who has replied to me, is just having a debate/conversation - I've not felt victimized or hard done at all in here.

Seriously Audio, that has to be the most pathetic point I've seen you argue on Neowin to date :laugh:

Well what does 5million mean?

It means 5 million to me, therefore if MS have sold 19, Sony have sold 14.

If it doesn't add up like that, SOMEONE isn't telling the truth.

I said clearly WHY I brought up the 5mil issue, and that is because over the web right now we've seen claims of a 6mil+ gap, sometimes more - MS have now said it's 5, so that is more credible than all the estimates we have on places like VGChartz (Their gap is 6.5 mil).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!