MS: Sony has failed to deliver on promises


Recommended Posts

Sony have promised things and not delivered, not once has anybody (myself included) said otherwise.

I own a 360, and many, many Microsoft products. I have no issues with them (apart from the 6 360's that have broken on me!). I just don't see why so many people jump onto the 'hate Sony' bandwagon.

Look, the way I see it no one jumped on the "hate Sony" wagon.

The guy raised some valid points, some of us agreed with him, that's it. It just looks like you take it too personally.

It's a shame the thread is going down the pan again, I just hope the mods can see everything I've posted is respectful, and everyone who has replied to me, is just having a debate/conversation - I've not felt victimized or hard done at all in here.

I think you are worrying over nothing. The thread is doing just fine.

Well what does 5million mean?

It means 5 million to me, therefore if MS have sold 19, Sony have sold 14.

If it doesn't add up like that, SOMEONE isn't telling the truth.

I said clearly WHY I brought up the 5mil issue, and that is because over the web right now we've seen claims of a 6mil+ gap, sometimes more - MS have now said it's 5, so that is more credible than all the estimates we have on places like VGChartz.

And where did you get those nice round 14 and 19 million? :p

What happens is Sony have released the next console 5 years into the lifespan, but continued to support the old one for 10 years.

PS2 came out 5 years into PS1's life, PS3 came out 5 years into PS2's life.

It's the perfect setup, it's a fact not everyone jumps ship to the next console right away - I mean there is 127 million PS2 owners just now, taking the Wii, 360 AND PS3, we're not even at 127 million., quite far off infact.

What you don't want is a new console coming out, and support for your old console going right down the pan almost instantly.

I can see no wrong in having a 10 year life cycle, in terms of ambition and actually carrying out the plan.

Well sure no, you don't want it to die. But 10 years is too long and what you instead have happen is have developers look past the newer console at least early in its life in order to hit the larger install base. It's likely alot easier for them to do it technically since they don't have to learna new system either. And as a result AAA titles end up on the previous gen console rather than the current one which doesnt help you get a foot in the door and also results in developers being later to the table at learning how to really utilise the machine.

I mean lets be honest, how many console sellers does the PS3 have out currently, especially exclusive ones? Pretty much Nil although theres good ones still but nothing earth shattering (I realise some titles will sell a console for some ppl, but I'm specifically talking about the big franchises here like MGS, GT, KZ, Final Fantasy). Thats about to change with Metal Gear and Grand Turismo, Killzone ect but these titles are comming 18 - 24 months into the consoles life. Close to two years for the big titles to arrive given a November 06 release of the console. Xbox was getting it's Gears of Wars ect 12 months in.

Really they should have had God Of War and a few other titles on the PS3. I really don't believe in this "support the PS2 for 5 years" strategy what so ever and I do maintain it only serves to hold the newest gen back. Support it, but don't support it for ever and get the big name titles onto the newer console as they are the ones you really need there.

Edited by Smigit
The article is showing the nitty gritty world of competition these corporations are taking part in, and it also shows why the gaming world right now is a very hostile place.

While things said in these articles hold truths, they way they are usually put across ensures they come across as smack talk to the group/supporters they are pointed at, and to those backing the article, it seems like cold hard truth.

It's a shame the thread is going down the pan again, I just hope the mods can see everything I've posted is respectful, and everyone who has replied to me, is just having a debate/conversation - I've not felt victimized or hard done at all in here.

Well what does 5million mean?

It means 5 million to me, therefore if MS have sold 19, Sony have sold 14.

If it doesn't add up like that, SOMEONE isn't telling the truth.

I said clearly WHY I brought up the 5mil issue, and that is because over the web right now we've seen claims of a 6mil+ gap, sometimes more - MS have now said it's 5, so that is more credible than all the estimates we have on places like VGChartz (Their gap is 6.5 mil).

He said 5m, obviously just an approximated guess. Why the nitpicking? Different sources will have different numbers, so just round it ok.

Well what does 5million mean?

It means 5 million to me, therefore if MS have sold 19, Sony have sold 14.

If it doesn't add up like that, SOMEONE isn't telling the truth.

I said clearly WHY I brought up the 5mil issue, and that is because over the web right now we've seen claims of a 6mil+ gap, sometimes more - MS have now said it's 5, so that is more credible than all the estimates we have on places like VGChartz (Their gap is 6.5 mil).

Dude, you can't give numbers in this industry and have them not be an approximation. Sorry man, you're making a bogus argument here.

-Spenser

I think you are worrying over nothing. The thread is doing just fine.

And where did you get those nice round 14 and 19 million? :p

Nothing is going to be nice and round as such, but you know what I mean.

I myself was surprised to see MS say 5, as from what the internet was like over the last few months, I did think they gap was 6-7mil.

But anyway, MS said 5, let's stop beating this to death - I was just making an observation due to what I believed prior to this article.

Audio, did this post threaten your stock shares in sony or the ps3? seriously, you defend anything sony to the death. Either you work for them, or have a ton of stock in them. its got to be 1 or the other. Most of your defenses are pretty shallow, and based purely off of speculation. Until this sony future of awesomeness shows up, just stick to facts, and stop nit picking on how many of what a console sold.

In the end, it all comes down to if the console runs, how many games it has, and how many of those games are good. Right now, sony is really only doing well in 1 area, where as the other 2 are really the most important...

Dude, you can't give numbers in this industry and have them not be an approximation. Sorry man, you're making a bogus argument here.

-Spenser

*Sigh*...

I know it isn't 110% accurate, but you can't make an approx of 5, and it actually be 6-7. If so, MS are not good at their figures.

If anything they are probably 5,248,085 consoles ahead.

There you go :p

Christ, I'm getting hit left right and centre over a mere figure observation :/ Cmon guys.

Audio, did this post threaten your stock shares in sony or the ps3? seriously, you defend anything sony to the death. Either you work for them, or have a ton of stock in them. its got to be 1 or the other. Most of your defenses are pretty shallow, and based purely off of speculation. Until this sony future of awesomeness shows up, just stick to facts, and stop nit picking on how many of what a console sold.

In the end, it all comes down to if the console runs, how many games it has, and how many of those games are good. Right now, sony is really only doing well in 1 area, where as the other 2 are really the most important...

And what area would that be?

As for the 'other' two being more important? Please

Only reason we have enjoyed such long spans with the Playstation consoles is because of market share. The 125 million+ won't happen again for Sony. Competition is in full effect. Getting games like God of War late in consoles lifespans will likely not happen this time, the platform will be catering to the old library and casual games like sports etc. for it's remaining years Big games will be appearing on the next gen consoles 6-7 years after the old console. This generation will be a long one, Microsoft are making money, Playstation needs the time, Wii has it's own corner. I doubt we will see new consoles till Fall 2011.

Anyway, comments from Greenberg are spot on though not sure about the numbers. He is probably just frustrated seeing Sony recover after another round of lies and hype while his console has the biggest game library and just if not more powerful in some areas with the console which is just plodding along losing it's lead ever so slightly. RROD, Jet engine issues aside it's amazing how the 360 hasn't taken off better. Playstation brand is strong, Xbox one was hurt after the first one got canned early and it's guaranteed they won't do that again, now RROD. They screwed up but doing so much better in every other area. I

Edited by OceanMotion
I don't see a 10 year cycle as a plus and theres other that believe such a strategy only holds Sony back. I think five or six years is fine for a console release, maybe seven tops but look how far systems have come in two decades and I think it's not really that great a move to aim for overly long cycles on a single platform. If they had dampened PS2 sales earlier then perhaps the PS3 would be in a better position now. Not saying it's in a bad position, but given the fact theres few exclusives on there currently it may have been better for some of the better titles such as the God of War sequal or whatever to have come out a bit later but hit the PS3 instead.

Anyway just thinking about that 10 year cycle. Doom 1 isnt even 20 years old so I'd hate to think Sony has plans to realistically support consoles for a full ten years. I know that doesnt mean they will release on every ten years but rather will support them with titles ect into the generation after, but still it's too long in this industry.

I think 10 might be a little too much, but I actually hope this generation does last 10 years. I have spent a ridiculous amount of money on my 360 (and a negligible amount on my Wii) and want that dollar to go for as long as possible.

Perhaps 10 isn't realistic, however, but if I were to pick a number, I think 7 years would be the sweet spot. Where the new console is released at the end of year 7. Any longer than that, and I won't be complaining, but will be looking forward to any new tidbits on a new console.

Look, the way I see it no one jumped on the "hate Sony" wagon.

The guy raised some valid points, some of us agreed with him, that's it. It just looks like you take it too personally.

Nailed it. (Y)

Audio, did this post threaten your stock shares in sony or the ps3? seriously, you defend anything sony to the death. Either you work for them, or have a ton of stock in them. its got to be 1 or the other. Most of your defenses are pretty shallow, and based purely off of speculation.

There's was need for that :/

Once all the dust has settled, the 360 will still come in third place.

Perhaps consumers should learn that large corporations are run by people who are not the infallible machine we put them up to being.

Sure, they should still be held accountable for mistakes, but this idea of viewing a lack of follow-through as a slap in the face is just ridiculous.

Everyone makes promises they can't keep. Do we really need someone to tell us to trust a large corporate beast, less?

Getting so emotional over such things is just silly. It doesn't make them evil.

Corporations can hardly ever get anything done, ever. They implode on their own internal bureaucracy.

I find these statements very ironic, coming from a Microsoft employee, no matter how factual they are. Sony (and the products listed) are easily interchangeable with any other company.

(Excuse me while I turn on my 360 and pray that I don't get a RROD...)

Anyway, comments from the Greenberg are spot on though not sure about the numbers. He is probably just frustrated seeing Sony recover after another round of lies and hype while his console has the biggest game library and just if not more powerful in some areas with the console is just plodding along losing it's lead ever so slightly. RROD, Jet engine issues aside it's amazing how the 360 hasn't taken off better. Playstation brand is strong, Xbox one was hurt after the first one got canned early and it's guaranteed they won't do that again, now RROD. They screwed up but doing so much better in every other area. I

MS have lied and hyped up as well mate, its not all Sony. People seem to forget that. The 360 is holding its own, its bound to slow down eventually.

More powerful? I don't think that is correct. Nothing has proved this to be true. If anything they equal in power at this point. If dev's can unlock the Cell chip though, things will change.

RROD has been the biggest problem for MS. Are they actually making money now? I thought they were still paying off the extended warranty costs.

I think 10 might be a little too much, but I actually hope this generation does last 10 years. I have spent a ridiculous amount of money on my 360 (and a negligible amount on my Wii) and want that dollar to go for as long as possible.

Perhaps 10 isn't realistic, however, but if I were to pick a number, I think 7 years would be the sweet spot. Where the new console is released at the end of year 7. Any longer than that, and I won't be complaining, but will be looking forward to any new tidbits on a new console.

I guess it's a very very individual thing this, but I'd rather shorter 6 or so year release cycles. I think $500 in hardware over that period of time is perfectly acceptable for myself and if newer technologys there I'm happy to pay to use it and I'd rather do that than sit on an older console for too overly long. I can keep the old one to play last gen games and hopefully they build some backwards compatibility (especially for titles say on the Xbox arcade). But for me the old hardware and titles dont become useless as the generation ends.

But yeah, I can understand that alot of people would rather save money and go through less hardware iterations. Being primary into PC games it's something I welcome, alot of people don't.

Once all the dust has settled, the 360 will still come in third place.
In terms of what? hardware sales? If so maybe. If you mean in terms of their entire console ecosystem but I think Nintendo run's the risk simply because they seems to be losing by a fair margin when it comes to software sales and attach rates (where MS traditionally has made the bulk of its console money afaik). MS are also using the Xbox to leverage digital downloads and other services which again, provides a revenue stream which will make up for losses in hardware to the other parties (if that does infact happen).

Anyway for MS I'm sure they will be absolutly delighted in that they are competing very solidly in regards to console sales this generation. Even if the PS3 wins out over them it won't have the same lead it had cme the end of the last generation.

I dont understand why you're arguing it though - you fight to the death to defend PS3 and now you're arguing they have less sales than MS is giving them credit for? It doesn't make sense :p

-Spenser

There is no argument, it was an observation on my behalf that didn't even need a reply.

I, as in ME, as in MYSELF, thought the gap was about 6-7, maybe even near 8mil of a difference from what I was led to believe off the net.

Therefore when I seen 5, I thought, oh not as large as I thought - That is all.

RROD has been the biggest problem for MS. Are they actually making money now? I thought they were still paying off the extended warranty costs.

Microsoft has been making money for over a year now. And on top of it, as i stated earlier, month after month, they pull in more revenue than the PS3 and Wii combined in North America.

-Spenser

Well sure no, you don't want it to die. But 10 years is too long and what you instead have happen is have developers look past the newer console at least early in its life in order to hit the larger install base. It's likely alot easier for them to do it technically since they don't have to learna new system either. And as a result AAA titles end up on the previous gen console rather than the current one which doesnt help you get a foot in the door and also results in developers being later to the table at learning how to really utilise the machine.

I mean lets be honest, how many console sellers does the PS3 have out currently, especially exclusive ones? Pretty much Nil although theres good ones still but nothing earth shattering (I realise some titles will sell a console for some ppl, but I'm specifically talking about the big franchises here like MGS, GT, KZ, Final Fantasy). Thats about to change with Metal Gear and Grand Turismo, Killzone ect but these titles are comming 18 - 24 months into the consoles life. Close to two years for the big titles to arrive given a November 06 release of the console. Xbox was getting it's Gears of Wars ect 12 months in.

Really they should have had God Of War and a few other titles on the PS3. I really don't believe in this "support the PS2 for 5 years" strategy what so ever and I do maintain it only serves to hold the newest gen back. Support it, but don't support it for ever and get the big name titles onto the newer console as they are the ones you really need there.

Um well, the PS2 sales and the fact it's still in shops and being bought makes "10 years" (give or take a bit of flexibility, really as long as your old gen console is supported for a few years more than the new) sensible to me :/

The developers can move off onto the PS4 in 5 years time if they want, but many will still like the option of making a cheaper PS3 title.

I mean, it's good to see FIFA, Madden and other sports games still get a yearly release on the PS2, along with the PS3 and 360 - Not everyone wants to be pushed into a new generation the second it's out.

I even seen today COD5 is suppose to be coming to the PS2 next year :|

Microsoft has been making money for over a year now. And on top of it, as i stated earlier, month after month, they pull in more revenue than the PS3 and Wii combined in North America.

-Spenser

Fair enough, doesn't affect me in the slightest how much money they make, nor should it you unless you have shares?

Hardware sales are what counts for gamers apparently?

Yes. Absolutely they do.

I can spell it out for you as to why if you should require...

No mate, no need. I just don't see the point in arguing about them.

If a console is selling thats good for the production of AAA rated games. It makes sense. I just don't ever remember this huge interest with the last generation sales.

If a console is selling thats good for the production of AAA rated games. It makes sense. I just don't ever remember this huge interest with the last generation sales.

Neither, but then again the other guys were so far behind it probably wasn't worth it.

Well there was a fair bit of talk but it was more focused on the lack of sales on the GC and XBox side more so than anything else which then lead onto whether the XBox division was really worth the time and resources that had been put into it.

No mate, no need. I just don't see the point in arguing about them.

If a console is selling thats good for the production of AAA rated games. It makes sense. I just don't ever remember this huge interest with the last generation sales.

It does seem a little odd if we don't have any real financial incentives to see sales, but that is pretty much the only way to determine the 'winner' in the console war. How else are we supposed to quantify it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!