Cannabis  

432 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you ever used Cannabis?

    • Yes
      267
    • No
      165
  2. 2. Will you use Cannabis? again?

    • Yes
      154
    • I am not Opposed
      58
    • Not Sure
      45
    • No
      175
  3. 3. Do You Support Legalization / Decriminalization of Cannabis?

    • Legalize Cannabis
      179
    • Decriminalize Cannabis
      119
    • Keep Cannabis Illegal
      134


Recommended Posts

Pot would lead to other drugs, just as cigs or alcohol would as well..... so using that argument is stupid, and now thrown out.

Pot brings on paranoia and causes people to act weirdly.... i guess its the pot, not the laws that can have you thrown into jail for very long times... seriously, the reason people hide and smoke, seem paranoid about it, and may act funny, is usually a side effect of the laws against the drug. If they didnt have to worry about having their lives ruined because of smoking it, im sure they would only be even more happy and at peace.

Pot is laced with other drugs.... maybe if you buy from a shady dealer who is trying to kill his customers.... legalize it, have government regulations, and you have nothing to worry about. Hell, if i bought cigs or alcohol from some dude off the street, i would have the same worries... correct?

Pot makes you lazy and un-motivates you... Again, when you put the fear that someone high will go to jail, they are more likely to not being going about town or trying things while high. Thus, due to the laws against the drug, it forces those to stay inside and do what they can, instead of maybe actually using it with what motivates them. Odd how many musicians, artist, writers, and other sort of awesome talents, people say that pot has actually helped them in thinking those things out. People who smoke weed are stuck in the bottom, not because of the weed, but because of the laws around it. Companies drug test for it, so you cant get a good job if you smoke; Even when it wouldnt hinder your performance any. ( not saying go to work stoned, just saying that a user who does it only while at home, and doesnt go to work high, will not have his job performance affected by it. )

In the end, EVERYONE MUST REMEMBER, EVERYTHING ISNT FOR EVERYONE! Just like a drivers license, some people just shouldnt have it. There are those who cant smoke cigs because they cant handle it. Those who drink alcohol and go crazy, so they shouldnt. As for weed, if it makes you do something that you dont like, or that is actually harmful to yourself or others, then it obviously isnt for you. To deprive someone of doing something, that has no effect on your life, your liberty, your peace, is just selfish and inconsiderate of others freedoms. If you dont like the smell, you know what, there are plenty of smells people dont like, ask them to move or walk some feet to the right or something. Sometimes we have to realize, we (me, you, ourself) are not the most important thing, and that really all of us, as a community, is what really matters. We should try to accommodate to everyone that we can, as long as it isnt destroying the community.

ps. To judge and base a decision on nothing but hearsay is pure ignorance. If you have never smoked it, you really have no say as to why its bad. You can complain that you dont like how it looks and smells, but without any other tidbit of knowledge on what it actually does, you cant defend any anti or pro drug argument. Research about it, thoroughly, and even test it; then you may discuss why you think its bad. But really in the long run, you have more to fear and worry about cigs.

thank the Lord for this bit of sense :)

now the Sunday roast can have its Sage and Rosamary without fear !

:cool:

I still think people are missing the social responsibility side of things. Maybe it isn't as bad in the states, but over here irresponsible consumption of alcohol is, IMO, a huge problem. People just go out and get ****ed for the sake of getting ****ed - that isn't responsible. Responsible would be a glass of wine with a meal or one pint/can of beer a night. I can't imagine things getting any better if Cannabis was legalised here.

I don't totally buy the reduction in money spent on fighting drug crime either. Sure, the amount of effort that goes into dealers and users reduces, but then the amount of effort spent on crimes like DUI goes up. It could potentially go to a level higher than now, as those who wouldn't have previously taken it would start taking it, increasing the number of related crimes. Unless of course you treat it the same as alcohol related crimes and simply don't give a toss. 3 Month sentences for drunk-driver-kid-road-kill FTW!

I'm not bothered about the health side. As with alcohol and smoking - it's your body and if you want to trash it, good for you! But when it starts effecting others, it has to stop! My Mum, sister and I were on the receiving end of a violent, alcoholic, husband/father, which is something that is becoming all too common in society now, if what we were told by those who eventually helped is true.

A lot of people seem to forget that alcohol/drug consumption doesn't just effect the user, but those around them, which frustrates me hugely. People get so annoyed about the Iraq war, China/Tibet, etc because it hurts people, but don't look at the effect of things going on in their own back garden.

To sum it up - as people can't consume alcohol sensibly and responsibly, and remember that they aren't the only human being on the planet, then they are certainly not capable of handling drugs in a sensible and responsible manner.

And no, I don't drink, I have no desire to and I don't have a problem with those who do it, providing they drink in a responsible manner, even though there is no valid reason why they should drink in the first place. I don't need to drink, or take cannabis, to see the effects it has on those other than the user.

</rant>

Edited by Fourjays

^ Interesting, but most people who smoke Cannabis don't bother others.

People here go out the bars, get drunk and go home.

I've done it, nothing wrong with it. I wasn't hurting anyone and I'm not saying that others don't but most people handle themselves.

Edited by Zab

i think it's not responsibility issue. it's just that some people like to get ****ed up. i like it too.

some of us just have it in our genes (as we're not the first generation ****ing ourselves up) -- you either do it or battle with it

if you find yourself a ****ing waster .. why not start smoking buds instead. maybe someday your head comes back home and your decide to live a normal life at least your body wont be completely ****ed. it also wont make you beat up your whole family and then showing how much of a man you are @ drunkdriving, like alcohol could. how much people get killed by someone whos drunk ? how much get killed by someone stoned?

after some time of hardcore drinking you get a delerium (or something like that, dunno how it spells) -- do potheads have something like that?

oversmoking psychosis? i dont think so

i know some sad examples of people really hooked on pot (stuff like that can happen if you have an addictive personality, but well -- with that you can get hooked on pretty much anything else) -- but well, what really happens when they are out of pot? well, they wanna smoke up, and mostly that's it. but an alcoholic can die on a hardcore hangover. and you can die from overdosing alcohol aswell

heck, why should we even discuss which one to legalize, which one to outlaw, it's obvious

i think it's not responsibility issue. it's just that some people like to get ****ed up. i like it too.

some of us just have it in our genes (as we're not the first generation ****ing ourselves up) -- you either do it or battle with it

if you find yourself a ****ing waster .. why not start smoking buds instead. maybe someday your head comes back home and your decide to live a normal life at least your body wont be completely ****ed. it also wont make you beat up your whole family and then showing how much of a man you are @ drunkdriving, like alcohol could. how much people get killed by someone whos drunk ? how much get killed by someone stoned?

after some time of hardcore drinking you get a delerium (or something like that, dunno how it spells) -- do potheads have something like that?

oversmoking psychosis? i dont think so

i know some sad examples of people really hooked on pot (stuff like that can happen if you have an addictive personality, but well -- with that you can get hooked on pretty much anything else) -- but well, what really happens when they are out of pot? well, they wanna smoke up, and mostly that's it. but an alcoholic can die on a hardcore hangover. and you can die from overdosing alcohol aswell

heck, why should we even discuss which one to legalize, which one to outlaw, it's obvious

+1

^ very uneducated on it.

Most Cannabis you buy will be exactly Cannabis. Grown from soils with no more chemicals in them than the very vegetables you eat.

The very smoking of Cannabis by itself doesn't hurt anybody unless these people are already unstable / possibly if unmotivated / have a mental disability / addictive personality, in which case they should stay away from any drug besides Aspirin and Prescriptions.

i think it's not responsibility issue. it's just that some people like to get ****ed up. i like it too.

some of us just have it in our genes (as we're not the first generation ****ing ourselves up) -- you either do it or battle with it

if you find yourself a ****ing waster .. why not start smoking buds instead. maybe someday your head comes back home and your decide to live a normal life at least your body wont be completely ****ed. it also wont make you beat up your whole family and then showing how much of a man you are @ drunkdriving, like alcohol could. how much people get killed by someone whos drunk ? how much get killed by someone stoned?

after some time of hardcore drinking you get a delerium (or something like that, dunno how it spells) -- do potheads have something like that?

oversmoking psychosis? i dont think so

i know some sad examples of people really hooked on pot (stuff like that can happen if you have an addictive personality, but well -- with that you can get hooked on pretty much anything else) -- but well, what really happens when they are out of pot? well, they wanna smoke up, and mostly that's it. but an alcoholic can die on a hardcore hangover. and you can die from overdosing alcohol aswell

heck, why should we even discuss which one to legalize, which one to outlaw, it's obvious

You are quite right and I have to concede that alcohol is the "greater evil" of the two.

I've seen what drugs do to people. I can't support something that ruins lives, IMO. And it's not like weed is even pure anymore. It's loaded with chemicals.

it's not drugs, it's people themselves. it's not like anyone's actually pushing you to do alcohol/drugs -- all you can blame is yourself for wanting it. after all -- you can always change your ways, whatever your hooked on. but only if you REALLY want it. get ready to put in some effort. & for some people, it's still just a way to get help from others -- show them the hard **** your going trough, eh. well if it is it that hard, then stop going trough it and do something useful instead. abusing stubstances is all about having fun, and nothing more. if you actually start not having fun, it's whack.

no offense, i might aswell say this to myself.

and the only weed which isnt pure -- that's **** weed, which otherwise wouldnt get you high at all. and it wont even when tuned, as it's some whack chemical high (which is quite likely to make your head hurt), not natural.

i know the strains i smoke. i know what they look like, what they smell like and what they get me high like. heck, i even know how fast it drains out when i either leave it on my table or put it in the fridge. if i would smell something that shouldn't be, i would go right back to the guy for a refund, as i've gotten something i didn't wanted. it's either really good weed or no weed for me.

cannabis won't magically set your mind free, tho. i've seen some people who manage to imprison theirs very well with the help of our sacred herb -- their fault, anyways -- make it a lesson for yourself. what it will do, it will make things look different to you, and therefore make you think about them from an other side. when you look @ what's your government saying from another side (other than blindly focusing on the "clever" words) there is nothing much left but crap. sure it doesn't go out to all countries, but surely to the one i'm living in :] sometimes it will just hurt you to see how shallow other people are, but you shouldnt. after all this is one big animal kingdom -- and you should thrive to be the fastest, the strongest, the best, in terms of a healthy body and mind. so if you find some **** pulling you back, you just know you have to quit it. automatically.

Hypocrits.

The laws anti-tobacco are not criminalizing smokers, as you are trying to pose.

They don't say to (private) companies "smokers can't smoke here", they state "make conditions for smokers, or else no smokie". The same can't be said about state spaces for obvious reasons. Smokers are given an option to quit or gtfo, when they shouldn't get one.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy, talk about our prime minister smoking with his buddies on the flights, same with the presidential staff.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy, talk about the good things about tobacco.

Your issues in Ireland occur here as well (except for the kids asking for booze and the prices rises in tobacco or booze; bumping gasoline/diesel prices are their deal, 17 rises since the beginning of the year).

So I'll have to say I agree (up to an extension) with urbaneve's post but all the drugs that she listed are prescription drugs here.

And to that guy with the "set your mind free" crap... Seriously. Shut up.

smoking ciggies is just whack

i don't see how it is enjoyable, nor any point to do so (tobacco does not reduce stress, it just limits your bloodflow, which causes headache and well alotof bad things), as they mostly have so many additives that you actually feel intoxication after smoking one

it wasn't that bad when i started smoking tho. now all the ciggies i get to buy are produced in lihtuania/poland, which could be the cause (it's not that i say they're bad countries -- it's just that large tobacco companies tend to save money on the production goin on there).

even if it doesn't make you sick right after smoking, it's bad.

it reduces lung capacity, contains lots of poisons, makes your body basically weaker (as you poison it a little bit all the time), reduces apetite blahblah, could go on and on, but i'm smoking rolling tobacco myself daily :rolleyes:

it should be banned -- as people are clearly ignorant and just smoke for the hell of it

come on, we all know it: tobacco causes cancer, it's a 50/50 that you'll get it if you spend your life smoking

what is it? we love tobacco companies more than we love ourselves? basically you're giving your health and money to them, just cause it's easier to smoke than to quit. how pathetic.

And to that guy with the "set your mind free" crap... Seriously. Shut up.

well it can help you set your mind free. anything can, if you believe so.

thing is in believing tho

  • 2 weeks later...

Now that provinces like Alberta are starting to make polluting public air illegal, I think we're in a good position to legalize pot. I can sympathize with people who want to go to a restaurant with their family and not inhale a pack of ciggrettes.

On the flip side, alcohol and nicotene are far more damaging. In my experience, the short-term effects of pot lasts approximately 3 days on myself. The main buzz will wear off after a few hours but I'll typically remain a bit more sluggish for the next 3 days after smoking.

I fly planes, and if I do choose to smoke pot, I will make sure I'm not flying a plane for atleast the next 72 hours. Technically, I should probably allow it to clear my blood to avoid any legal complications, but that can take between 2 weeks to 2 months. And I guarantee you, pot is not slowing me up anymore after a week of being sober. As well I should note: I would rather fly with a pilot who is as high as kite than with one who is hungover.

Tried it... wasn't that all impressed. Haven't done it since and doubt I'd do it again.

I do think it should be legalized with the same penalties that drinking has... no under 21... no driving... etc...

no one gets high on the first puff.

I wasn't impressed either the first time I tried it, but after a few tries I saw its potential.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!