My Dad Is Looking To Buy A Laptop


Recommended Posts

Okay, the first model he might want to look at is the T61:

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...176AD5FB80FA5D8

He would most likely be interested in the "ThinkPad T61 14.1" widescreen with integrated graphics". I'd recommend a hard-drive upgrade to at least 120gb, and the 6-cell battery instead of 4-cell. If you're comfortable with installing memory (it's very easy and there's a video on Lenovo's website), then just get 1gb (be sure to select the 1 DIMM option, so that you have an empty slot for another 2gb DIMM) and then you can upgrade it to a total of 3gb with this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16820134549.

As for other features, since you have money to spend, you might want to add the integrated card reader, integrated bluetooth PAN, DVD-RW. I DO NOT RECOMMEND getting the 1gb TurboMemory as some users have seen problems with it.

Another model he might like, and the one I personally highly recommend, is the X61s:

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...678EA089EF892A3

This laptop uses an ultra-low voltage processor for extended battery life. This means it's a 1.6ghz Processor, but it performs pretty damn well and give you a longer battery span. Since he won't do any intensive work that require mad processing like video editing, I think this is the most suitable option for his needs. Again, keep the 1gb RAM and make sure to choose 1GB in only 1 DIMM so that you can get that same extra 2gb's I mentioned earlier. I recommend upgrading to the Intel Wireless ABGN card for future proofing, and also get integrated Bluetooth PAN. I also recommend getting the 8-cell high-capacity battery for a much longer battery life. Remember to upgrade the hard-drive here as well. And anything else to suit his needs.

And the third model I'll recommend from Lenovo is the X61 (no "s"):

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...7E1A6952DF8E9DF

The only difference from the one I just mentioned last is the fact it uses a regular-voltage processor which is also faster and performs stronger on more processor-intensive tasks. Same options apply, it'll just have a bit lower battery life.

Remember, the X's are Lenovo's top-of-the-line laptops, and are lighter and slimmer than the T-Series. The T-series is still an amazing laptop, and also very slim and low-profile, the X's are just slimmer and MORE low profile, and lighter. I personally recommend the X61s on your budget, he will be very satisfied. If you have any questions, let me know, I'll be more than happy to answer them.

I'll let someone else comment on Dell, as that's not my beach :p

Edit: I see someone mentioned the X300, unfortunately that's way over his price range. But if he wants to shell out three grand, than it's perfect.

Okay, the first model he might want to look at is the T61:

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...176AD5FB80FA5D8

He would most likely be interested in the "ThinkPad T61 14.1" widescreen with integrated graphics". I'd recommend a hard-drive upgrade to at least 120gb, and the 6-cell battery instead of 4-cell. If you're comfortable with installing memory (it's very easy and there's a video on Lenovo's website), then just get 1gb (be sure to select the 1 DIMM option, so that you have an empty slot for another 2gb DIMM) and then you can upgrade it to a total of 3gb with this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16820134549.

As for other features, since you have money to spend, you might want to add the integrated card reader, integrated bluetooth PAN, DVD-RW. I DO NOT RECOMMEND getting the 1gb TurboMemory as some users have seen problems with it.

Another model he might like, and the one I personally highly recommend, is the X61s:

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...678EA089EF892A3

This laptop uses an ultra-low voltage processor for extended battery life. This means it's a 1.6ghz Processor, but it performs pretty damn well and give you a longer battery span. Since he won't do any intensive work that require mad processing like video editing, I think this is the most suitable option for his needs. Again, keep the 1gb RAM and make sure to choose 1GB in only 1 DIMM so that you can get that same extra 2gb's I mentioned earlier. I recommend upgrading to the Intel Wireless ABGN card for future proofing, and also get integrated Bluetooth PAN. I also recommend getting the 8-cell high-capacity battery for a much longer battery life. Remember to upgrade the hard-drive here as well. And anything else to suit his needs.

And the third model I'll recommend from Lenovo is the X61 (no "s"):

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...7E1A6952DF8E9DF

The only difference from the one I just mentioned last is the fact it uses a regular-voltage processor which is also faster and performs stronger on more processor-intensive tasks. Same options apply, it'll just have a bit lower battery life.

Remember, the X's are Lenovo's top-of-the-line laptops, and are lighter and slimmer than the T-Series. The T-series is still an amazing laptop, and also very slim and low-profile, the X's are just slimmer and MORE low profile, and lighter. I personally recommend the X61s on your budget, he will be very satisfied. If you have any questions, let me know, I'll be more than happy to answer them.

I'll let someone else comment on Dell, as that's not my beach :p

Edit: I see someone mentioned the X300, unfortunately that's way over his price range. But if he wants to shell out three grand, than it's perfect.

This is awesome. I really like it. He chose the X61s out of these. Thanks.

Now if someone can do it for Dell that will be all...

I'm sorry but the X61's listed on Lenovo's site are complete rip offs. $1300 for 1.6Ghz Core 2 Duo? I got the same specifications for an HP for <$1000.

I recommend the X61 but not with those specifications... Those specifications went out of date two years ago.

I'm sorry but the X61's listed on Lenovo's site are complete rip offs. $1300 for 1.6Ghz Core 2 Duo? I got the same specifications for an HP for <$1000.

I recommend the X61 but not with those specifications... Those specifications went out of date two years ago.

Did you not read the other replys? Does HP/Dell/Acer and so on have the following? (excluding "tough" books)

*magnesium roll-cage and magnesium-alloy front and bottom covers

*an accelerometer to detect any falls and disable the hard drive

*security chip

*metal hinges

*spill proof keyboard

The Lenovo will be more, almost guaranteed. Their build quality comes with a premium. Sure a HP/Dell/Acer/whatever will cost less, but will it hold up to the abuse?

I'm sorry but the X61's listed on Lenovo's site are complete rip offs. $1300 for 1.6Ghz Core 2 Duo? I got the same specifications for an HP for <$1000.

I recommend the X61 but not with those specifications... Those specifications went out of date two years ago.

The whole point of the X61s is that the 1.6ghz C2D is a ULV processor, or Ultra-Low Voltage. It has 4mb of L2 cache, and you'd be pretty surprised at how well it performs. It's part of Intel's new "Penryn" line of processors, and don't let the clock speed fool you. Here is a full review of the X61s, and it assesses the performance if that's a concern:

http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?...amp;review=X61s

The L7500 benchmarks pretty well, and the rest of the laptop does pretty good. Remember, his dad does not need processor power for typing in data. The L7500 will run everything he needs smoothly without a hiccup. Forget the Mhz myth =)

He can always go for the X61 and get the higher end T8xx or T9xx processors. Heck, his budget very well allows it. But I believe he's more concerned with having longer battery life rather than unnecessary processing power. Again, the X61s is made to still perform great, but excel in mobility.

Wish I could help you out with Dell, but I'm glad he found something he likes at Lenovo. Again, IBM (now Lenovo) ThinkPads have always come at a premium, and that premium used to be an extremely high price and long wait for certain configurations. Now with IBM's consumer/business division taken over by Lenovo, they have become a lot more accessible and still retain the great quality. I'm sure he'll really appreciate the features I've mentioned that are unique to Lenovos.

Let us know how it goes!

Y510

[LINK]

it's pretty good for almost anything. there are 6 default builds all below 1.2k, cheapest is 669.

No more Lenovo recommendations. my Dad has chosen his Lenovo laptop but still wants to look at Dell or maybe Vaio.

So... any Dell or Vaio recommendations?

No more Lenovo recommendations. my Dad has chosen his Lenovo laptop but still wants to look at Dell or maybe Vaio.

So... any Dell or Vaio recommendations?

I'm recommending you stay away from Sony Vaios. They are overpriced and sub-par for the most part. Just not worth it, their support is not great either from what I hear. My friend has a Vaio and it was way overpriced for the hardware he got and plus it feels cheap. I don't know what other people have to say, but I personally do not recommend going with a Vaio.

XPS 1330 with LED backlit screen and 6 and 9-cell batteries, 4 year warranty and accidental damage coverage.

I say this is a great recommendation. I have an inspiron 1520 but I have personally seen the xps 1330 gavce a recommendation ffor it to somebody who asked me for one and they love it.

Its a nice small laptop thats perfect for bringing places and doesn't sacrifice on the power (has a geforce 8400gs gpu).

Also go to www.notebookreview.com to get dell coupons to get some money off of the purchase.

I would stay away from DELL with their issues with customer service and lousy repair stories its not a wonder why they are being sued...

I have a Dell Desktop XPS 420 and it has been doing great. Warranty and repair service are great here (I haven't had a problem but thats what I have heard) and they look great.

So Inspiron or XPS? For a light-weight business laptop?

I thought Dell's business line was called "Vostro".

I'm not really familiar with Dell's newer models apart from the XPS1530. However, I know HP dv6700 Special Edition laptop (if equipped with a 9 cell battery) will perform VERY well for $1600.

The three Dell Models are;

1. Dell Vostro M1310

2. Dell XPS 1530

3. Dell Inspiron 1525

4. Dell XPS 1330

Which ones of these are light and have long running batteries and perform really well?

Can someone tell me about these laptops and which is the best?

+1 for the HP camp... The HP Compaq business series are very sturdy at a fair price.

Dell: crappy performance, cheap(400~1000), breaks, looks cheap

HP: pretty descent performance, not that expensive (1000~2000), very durable, looks OK/strict (semi sexy IMHO :p)

Lenovo: kick ass performance, hell expensive (easily 2000+), extreme build quality, looks fugly :x

Apple is descent but overpriced .. Toshiba's / Sony's underperform .. Acer and ASUS are total crap (look nice/perform nice .. and then break in 2) .. BTO/Zepto/Homebuild = sucky build quality/durability... all else is fail or overpriced...

either you have bad taste or just not enough knowledge about aesthetics. Heard of Latitude notebooks? Neither looks cheap nor crappy...whatever runs breaks.

The three Dell Models are;

1. Dell Vostro M1310

2. Dell XPS 1530

3. Dell Inspiron 1525

4. Dell XPS 1330

Which ones of these are light and have long running batteries and perform really well?

Can someone tell me about these laptops and which is the best?

I think he wont like the XPS1330, its so called small for everyday use unless he plans to dock it and use it most of the time. I would max out the XPS 1530. Also look at the Dell Latitudes they are rock solid...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!