Policy regarding OS X on non-Apple Hardware

By Marshalus
in Site Announcements

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
But owning a valid copy of OS X and installing a hacked version of it on a pc are 2 totally different things.

This was something that we actually discussed, the staff I mean. This is essentially what we agreed, "'Cracking' is circumventing a copy protection of some sort. There is no copy protection with OS X. There isn't even a CD key at all. What's being done by people is they are modifying the software in a way that violates their EULA. But a EULA is just an agreement between the user and Apple. It's nothing illegal to violate it, since it's not a law that you're breaking. The most Apple can do for violating it is to deny you support."

Grand Master

giga Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
So, a user can violate the Apple EULA, as long as they bought one install media.

Likewise for Vista? If I purchase a boxed copy, I can freely violate the EULA on Neowin and install it on numerous PCs and get support?

Sounds crazy, if true!

How would you? Circumventing activation/copy protection? (which doesn't apply to OS X)

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Why does everyone bitch so much about this topic? :s The mods have allowed it. Period. Windows on Macs. OSX on x86. Everyone gets everything and everything is avaliable to everyone.

Stop bitching.

I'm not bitching. I'm trying to see if the same freedom to violate Microsoft or Adobe Photoshop EULAs will be given.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
So, a user can violate the Apple EULA, as long as they bought one install media.

Likewise for Vista? If I purchase a boxed copy, I can freely violate the EULA on Neowin and install it on numerous PCs and get support?

Sounds crazy, if true!

No, because you only have one license for that copy of Vista. Purchasing a copy of Vista only grants you the rights to install it on one PC, the same with OS X. That would be the law, not just the EULA.

Community Regular

funciona

Posted
Posted
I'm not bitching. I'm trying to see if the same freedom to violate Microsoft or Adobe Photoshop EULAs will be given.

You are bitching about something that is legal (installing OSX on x86) and something illegal (installing Vista on more than one PC with the same license)

See the difference? If you still dont, please forget about it. If you are not intrested in this world, ignore that and done. Don't ruin it for the rest of us.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
You are bitching about something that is legal (installing OSX on x86) and something illegal (installing Vista on more than one PC with the same license)

See the difference? If you still dont, please forget about it. If you are not intrested in this world, ignore that and done. Don't ruin it for the rest of us.

No need to be rude, he's just looking for our reasoning behind us changing our policy. No harm in asking for clarification.

Grand Master

Lee G. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I have mixed feelings about - Part of me is pleased that this discussion is now allowed as it's interesting, but the other hopes that this doesn't give people a license to constantly complain and demand help on how their copy doesn't work, or that it needs sorting out; or asking others on how to obtain it.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
I have mixed feelings about - Part of me is pleased that this discussion is now allowed as it's interesting, but the other hopes that this doesn't give people a license to constantly complain and demand help on how their copy doesn't work, or that it needs sorting out; or asking others on how to obtain it.

Let me be clear on this, if a person requests information on how to obtain a copy of OS X, if someone posts warez, that person will be punished. Our rules are clear that warez is NOT welcomed here and that rule will continue.

Outside of that, as long as users have a legal copy of OS X, we will gladly allow discussion on how to modify the files so that they can install and run it on any AMD/Intel processor.

Mentor

evo_spook

Posted
Posted

I think they've just opened up a big can of worms that they really should have kept covered up.

Its a very slippery slope they have just started down.

We all know that the OSX used on whitebox PCs is going to be a pirated version just as we know that a the majority of people have pirated software on their machines, dodgy decisions to open up with no visible sign on what exactly they stand to gain by the decision.

Grand Master

Tim Dorr Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I'm not bitching. I'm trying to see if the same freedom to violate Microsoft or Adobe Photoshop EULAs will be given.

We've been allowing discussion of violating the Windows EULA ever since we've supported people installing uxtheme hacks.

What we're saying here is it's OK to talk about going down to the Apple Store, buying a copy of OS X, coming back home and modding the files on the disk so you can run it on your PC. There's no US law violated by that, just an agreement between you and Apple.

What we are not saying is its OK to go download a copy of OS X and mod it to work on your computer. That's a violation of copyright laws.

Copying bad. Modding OK.

Grand Master

Lee G. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Let me be clear on this, if a person requests information on how to obtain a copy of OS X, if someone posts warez, that person will be punished. Our rules are clear that warez is NOT welcomed here and that rule will continue.

Outside of that, as long as users have a legal copy of OS X, we will gladly allow discussion on how to modify the files so that they can install and run it on any AMD/Intel processor.

Yeah - sorry Hurmoth. I realize that - in fact I just edited my post to get rid of most of what I'd said... but I edited it back so it doesn't look all odd, now I've been quoted.

As this doesn't violate US laws then I'm pleased that this discussion is allowed. But yeah, I know Neowin will punish those who discuss how to to obtain it. Neowin of course has proved to be very good at dealing with topics that involve warez.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
So, what exactly is allowed and what isn't? Am I allowed to make a topic asking what version of OSX86 would be best for my hardware? No links to the software, obviously, but just names.

No, because that would be warez. What is allowed is you going and purchasing a legitimate copy from Apple, Best Buy, etc. and manipulating the files yourself to be able to install it on any Intel-based computer.

Grand Master

Tim Dorr Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
We all know that the OSX used on whitebox PCs is going to be a pirated version just as we know that a the majority of people have pirated software on their machines, dodgy decisions to open up with no visible sign on what exactly they stand to gain by the decision.

No, we don't. It's quite easy to go down to your local Apple Store or Best Buy and pick up a copy of Leopard. It's entirely possible to get OS X on your PC in that manner in legal ways.

We can't be absolutely sure that every person receiving Windows support on these forums has got a legit copy. Should we stop providing help for everyone out of risk that they might be running an illegal copy?

Mentor

evo_spook

Posted
Posted
No, because that would be warez. What is allowed is you going and purchasing a legitimate copy from Apple, Best Buy, etc. and manipulating the files yourself to be able to install it on any Intel-based computer.

hmmm, the scenario you keep describing thou Hurmoth, I sell you a stolen laptop in a Pub, as-long as I don't tell you its stolen, its OK

Mentor

Darran

Posted
Posted (edited)
The mods have allowed it. Period.

So if the mods allowed discussion and distribution of warez or bomb manufacturing we shouldn't have the right to discuss whether they may have made a terrible mistake? I'm not saying it's anything on the same level but we should be allowed to discuss whether it makes sense for Neowin.

Edited by Darran
Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
We all know that the OSX used on whitebox PCs is going to be a pirated version just as we know that a the majority of people have pirated software on their machines, dodgy decisions to open up with no visible sign on what exactly they stand to gain by the decision.

First of all, imagine the number of people that have pirated software here already, such as Windows itself. We DO NOT support that, but as long as we don't know, what can we do about it?

The fact of the matter is, there are people who are running a legit copy of OS X on their PC. I am one of them. I'm doing it more for testing purposes, but I own a legit copy of OS X and I manipulated the files myself, so everything I've done is 100% within the law. Other's might be trying to do the same, but could be running into minor issues. What we gain is a new market, if you will. We are opening ourselves up for a larger community, but this time in the Mac world.

Grand Master

giga Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I think they've just opened up a big can of worms that they really should have kept covered up.

Its a very slippery slope they have just started down.

We all know that the OSX used on whitebox PCs is going to be a pirated version just as we know that a the majority of people have pirated software on their machines, dodgy decisions to open up with no visible sign on what exactly they stand to gain by the decision.

And we also know that the majority of users here are running pirated versions of Vista, XP, Photoshop, etc.

So, what exactly is allowed and what isn't? Am I allowed to make a topic asking what version of OSX86 would be best for my hardware? No links to the software, obviously, but just names.

No, you're not. That would be like asking "which version of Vista on thepiratebay should I download"

What you are allowed is to discuss how to run a legally license/bought Leopard DVD on your PC. This usually means emulating EFI or modding the Leopard license you bought to make it run on your PC.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
hmmm, the scenario you keep describing thou Hurmoth, I sell you a stolen laptop in a Pub, as-long as I don't tell you its stolen, its OK

There's a difference there though. Neowin is not legally libel for what a user does as long as Neowin doesn't know about it. A person is not protected the same way however.

Neowin is not promoting the use of illegally obtained software, in fact we're punishing those who talk about illegally obtaining software.

Grand Master

kylejn

Posted
Posted
No, because that would be warez. What is allowed is you going and purchasing a legitimate copy from Apple, Best Buy, etc. and manipulating the files yourself to be able to install it on any Intel-based computer.

Gotcha. I already own a copy of Leopard anyway, so I'm in the clear.

Thanks!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Apple releases iOS 27 Beta 2 for developers and power users

      By Aditya Tiwari · Posted

      Apple releases iOS 27 Beta 2 for developers and power users by Aditya Tiwari It's been a couple of weeks since Apple previewed the iOS 27 update during the WWDC official keynote. The upcoming iOS version will bring even more refinements to the Liquid Glass design language, an upgraded Siri AI assistant, and several new Apple Intelligence features. Interestingly, the latest WWDC keynote was different than previous years. Apple has released the iOS 27 beta 2 (build 24A5370h) for developers who want to test the new features being baked for the iPhone and optimize their apps. If you're interested in downloading the latest beta, go to Settings > General > Software Update > beta Updates, then choose iOS 27 Developer Beta. You can download the latest iOS 27 beta on more than 30 supported iPhones. Make sure you know what you are doing since developer betas can be unstable and unexpected at times. If you want to be on the safer side, you can wait for the public beta, which will arrive next month. It's been a while since Apple discontinued its AirPort router lineup. Now, the company said in the iOS 27 beta 2 release notes that the AirPort Utility is deprecated and won't be available for new downloads from the App Store. Apple added that if you previously downloaded the app, you can re-download it. However, the functionality isn't guaranteed when using the AirPort Utility on iOS 27 or later. Speaking of known issues, Apple said that the Portrait mode blur effect might render incorrectly for photos; you may be unable to stop an alarm from the lock screen without unlocking your iPhone; the "Add a Control" button in Control Center edit mode might appear small or clipped. There are several new features in iOS 27 beta 2 as well. It comes with Neural Engine improvements for Apple Intelligence, including better performance when loading large models over 1GB. HomeKit Secure Video recordings are processed on-device and through Private Cloud Compute for video descriptions and search, when Apple Intelligence is enabled in the Home app. That said, you can also download the second betas of macOS 27 Golden Gate, iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, and other Apple operating systems.
    • AMD 26.6.2 driver brings FSR 4.1 support to RDNA 3 RX 7000 series graphics cards

      By RejZoR · Posted

      FSR 4.1 is insanely superior to FSR 3. Like, FSR 4.1 Performance looks better than FSR 3.1 Quality. It's great they are finally enabling it for RX 7000 users. A bit late, but I guess better late than never.
    • Rockstar confirms Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders begin next week, unveils cover art

      By TCA · Posted

      Was it the way the cars handled in 4? or was it the choices you had to make?
    • Rockstar confirms Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders begin next week, unveils cover art

      By TCA · Posted

      Exactly.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By Parallax Abstraction · Posted

      I understand the position Valve is in with hardware pricing thanks to the AI bubble, but as others have said, this is DOA at this price point. There's no world in which a machine at that performance level is worth that price. My girlfriend's a console gamer and after meeting me, wanted to try PC but wanted something she could use on her TV with a controller. The Steam Machine is basically tailor made for her, but only at what it would have cost before the hardware crisis. I took my old Lenovo Legion laptop with a Ryzen 5800H and a 3060 Mobile 8GB, put Bazzite on it and it does the same thing with the games she's interested in very well. She still likes the Steam Machine, but won't be touching it until component prices are back in the sane range. I know Valve isn't a charity, but I don't know why they're not willing to at least partially subsidize this device or even take a loss on it during the component crisis, just to build some market share. Then again, the Steam Deck is also a complete ripoff at its current price and they can barely keep them in stock so...

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      80
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!