Intel Processors Overclock Database


Recommended Posts

There's the verdict! Haha...

Feel free to make another post in this thread with your BIOS Vcore...picture not necessarily required since you can't really post a screenshot of BIOS and taking a digital camera picture would be quite a bit of work for 4 numbers. :p

Sorry, I guess I should've clarified...I kind of assumed everyone was doing the BIOS vcore because that's what I've been used to on other forums. So here it is and I'll update the first post:

Post the BIOS vcore, the sole reason being vdroop.

I completely disagree with posting the BIOS vcore, as that value is misleading due to Vdrop on some motherboards. I don't know what forums you visit, but on the major sites such as XtremeSystems, you see people posting overclocks based on true vcore values, not BIOS. I will not post my overclock as my BIOS vcore is far larger than my true idle and load vcore.

Well, I don't know. I've seen both being used and I was kind of tossing the idea between the idle CPU-Z vcore and the BIOS one. The former probably being more accurate and the latter seems more standardized.

As for the forums, I've actually seen both with the BIOS vcores being reported as BIOS vcores. The other values never seem to be very consistent, at least in reporting, however I'll go ahead and switch it up to idle CPU-Z vcore.

Just PM me the idle CPU-Z vcores to avoid clutter.

eh...rocky start. Oh well crap happens.

I actually have an account on XS, but I don't nor lurk too often because their non-overclocking related material tends to be.....bad. Their PSU manufacturer recommendation list being a good example...anyway off topic and my apologies for flipping the wrong side of the coin for the vcore.

Slight update to mine. Changed values are in bold.

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 3.68 GHz

Stepping: B

Vcore: 1.368

Cooling: Liquid - Koolance Exos-2

Motherboard: Asus P5E BIOS: 605

OS: Vista Ultimate SP1 x64

RAM: OCZ OCZ2RPR800C44GK 2 x 2GB

460MHz 5-5-5-15 2T

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=378446

post-60263-1214085175.png

Prime95 19+ hours stable.

post-60263-1214085151_thumb.png

...Just PM me the idle CPU-Z vcores to avoid clutter....

Or we could just update the vcores from the cpu-z screenshots that were included. That way they were actually for a reason other than "proof" :p

EDIT: unless they weren't all taken at idle... mine is 1.240V

Would probably be easier just to post your CPU-Z Vcore again, seeing as how this thread is now 6 pages long. Quite a bit of work going through six pages of posts to find a screenshot :p

Latest version as of June 21st, 2008 4:55PM

CHANGES: Updated utdarkviper's vcore.

I take my screenshots with Orthos still running, but I guess I can look through the submissions and see which ones had a stress test program running and which did not.

edit: Okay I quickly skimmed through and the screenshots with stress programs up were running and the CPU-Z only screenshots were not clarified.

I'll be posting my information for my E4500 that is now running at 3GHz in a couple hours when the orthos 8 hour stress is done. In the meantime, check out this video of this guy's how to on how to overclock: http://youtube.com/watch?v=30aZHIpgcOY

It's hillarious. He just tells you what vcore to set it at without even having you try to find the minimum vcore you can run at and obviously has speedstep or something enabled (as you can see in CPU-Z), lowering his clock and raising it. He also uses ntune to check for stability and it's only using one core :laugh:

I'll be posting my information for my E4500 that is now running at 3GHz in a couple hours when the orthos 8 hour stress is done. In the meantime, check out this video of this guy's how to on how to overclock: http://youtube.com/watch?v=30aZHIpgcOY

It's hillarious. He just tells you what vcore to set it at without even having you try to find the minimum vcore you can run at and obviously has speedstep or something enabled (as you can see in CPU-Z), lowering his clock and raising it. He also uses ntune to check for stability and it's only using one core :laugh:

Ha, I couldn't even keep watching it after he opened CPUz. He forgot to disable C1E and/or SpeedStep.

Yeah, I always have it off because I don't see any reason to have it on. I want to have my PC running full speed all of the time. My memory speed is gonna change, because I realized my new sticks that I bought a couple weeks ago that I have been using weren't stable at 792MHz so it's gonna be a little slower, but I'm not sure yet. I have to run memtest to find what speed I'm gonna set 'em at :)

EDIT: It would be kinda cool if we posted our superpi 1M digits times at our overclocked speed or something along with our posts just as a means of speed comparison. We would all have to use the original unmodified version so that it was equal, but I think it would be cool.

Edited by Citrusleak

We could start a superpi thread, but it doesn't really indicate that much in terms of real world performance. Anyway, this is primarily for reporting numbers, vcore, and FSB. Which reminds me shift, I think we should just have people clarify whether or not they want their FSB numbers published. I know you took the FSB from the overclocks posted, but they don't indicate the max FSB of the setups. 264 FSB from the P35-DS3L for example? I know the board has done 500 before..just looking at it in terms of usefulness.

I agree, let's just put a note on the first post saying to indicate whether or not they want their FSB posted (and whether or not it is the maximum FSB they have managed to attain on given chipset/motherboard).

Although I do think it's SOMEWHAT useful seeing the trend of FSBs across various chipsets.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
    • Last year I bought the 2TB variant for $114 on Amazon. That's crazy that the 1TB is now 67% more expensive for half the storage, even with the newer T9 already on the market. And that's considered a good deal.
    • You can disable all non needed features from Brave. There is also Brave Origin which removes them entirely and it is free for Linux.
    • I wish I could use Brave but the tab suspension feature is horrible. It doesn't suspend them like Edge does. Even after 2h open with 70+ tabs (same as Edge), it has 2GB more consumption than Edge for no reason.
    • TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 by Razvan Serea TeamViewer is the fast, simple and friendly solution for remote access over the Internet - all applications in one single, very affordable module. Remote control of computers over the Internet, Instantly take control over a computer anywhere on the Internet, even through firewalls. No installation required, just use it fast and secure. Training, sales and teamwork, TeamViewer can also be used to present your desktop to a partner on the Internet. Show and share your software, PowerPoint presentations etc. File transfer, chat and more, Share your files, chat, switch the direction during a teamwork session, and a lot more is included in TeamViewer. TeamViewer key features: Cross-platform remote access (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, IoT) Attended and unattended remote control Secure file transfer between devices Remote printing to local printers Multi-monitor support with easy switching Wake-on-LAN for sleeping devices Session links for quick connections (no password sharing) Web client access (no installation needed) End-to-end encryption (AES-256) Two-factor authentication and access controls AI-powered session insights and reporting Mass deployment and device management tools Customizable allow/block lists for security Command line and script execution remotely Performance monitoring and analytics dashboards TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 changelog: Improvements Permissions inheritance has been improved, increasing reliability when permissions are assigned to user group managers. Bugfixes Fixed a bug where 'Show details' button was not showing up on command bar upon selection of a device group. Fixed a bug which was causing the legacy groups to disappear when applying hide offline filter in basic view. Fixed a bug where devices were loading infinitely after login. Fixed a bug which was causing crash in application. Download: TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 | 32-bit | Portable | Mac | ~70.0 MB (Free for personal use) View: TeamViewer Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Edouard
      135
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!