Recommended Posts

Just installed it. My god it's horrendous. Lagging on the keyboard, constant beachballing, generally everything taking ages to load... urgh.

inplace upgrade or clean install? and what system exactly?

just found this, might clear up what macs get what benefits of SL

http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/08/24/mac-os...ands-august-28/

Edited by Phantom Helix
inplace upgrade or clean install? and what system exactly?

Whatever happens when you whack the disc in and click install. I thought SL did an Archive and Install by default rather than an inplace upgrade.

Anyway I rebooted and waited for Spotlight to finish doing it's thing and it seems to be better now. We'll see how it goes for the rest of the day...

...

1. Is there any downside/negative aspect to going full 64 bit? I'm on the latest Macbook Pro 17" so I'm 'capable'. How do you know if software doesn't work in x64... it just doesn't launch?

...

Software that uses kernel extensions or communicates in certain ways with the kernel won't work (Virtualization software would be one such type)

You don't gain much (if anything) from running the kernel in 64bit mode, it might be slightly faster at some tasks but most of the time spent on the computer isn't spent inside the kernel anyway (Most of the time is spent in frameworks and userland apps, having those 64bit would provide a better opportunity for performance increases than the kernel)

64-bit Kernel and Extensions: No

:(

Same here on my Macbook. My CPU is 64bit, my EFI is, in 64bit kernel boot mode but I'm still stuck with 32bit kernel.

This is a REAL artificial limitation that Apple gave us. Kudos to Windows on that one, as I'm running Win7 x64 in bootcamp without any problems.

Same here on my Macbook. My CPU is 64bit, my EFI is, in 64bit kernel boot mode but I'm still stuck with 32bit kernel.

This is a REAL artificial limitation that Apple gave us. Kudos to Windows on that one, as I'm running Win7 x64 in bootcamp without any problems.

It's not artificial. It's for compatibility reasons. Rather than going all 64-bit or all 32-bit, Apple is giving users the ability to get a very, very large majority of the performance enhancements from 64-bit by letting apps run as 64-bit but still keeping compatibility with virtualization software and other 32-bit kernel extension users by keeping the kernel as 32-bit.

How do I make my Safari 32-bit?

open your applications folder command-click or right click on Safari and select get info, check the open in 32-bit mode check box, close and restart Safari

and here is a better SL feature to Mac hardware compatibility chart

http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/08/24/mac-os...ands-august-28/

open your applications folder command-click or right click on Safari and select get info, check the open in 32-bit mode check box, close and restart Safari

and here is a better SL feature to Mac hardware compatibility chart

http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/08/24/mac-os...ands-august-28/

Thanku!!

Anybody had the issue where the sound/volume level keeps resetting upon every restart?

Originally, my sound would stay on the same level I last used, with Leopard.

But with Snow Leopard, it keeps resetting to Level 4 (25%).

I did an upgrade on my MacBook, and my iMac.

This issue only happens on my MacBook.

click the about this mac to bring up your version window then click the more info button

that brings up the system profiler, click "Software" from the menu on the left, now near the bottom of the right it should say 64bit kernel and extensions YES

Nope, it still says "No". I have the newest 2009 Mini btw.

It's not artificial. It's for compatibility reasons. Rather than going all 64-bit or all 32-bit, Apple is giving users the ability to get a very, very large majority of the performance enhancements from 64-bit by letting apps run as 64-bit but still keeping compatibility with virtualization software and other 32-bit kernel extension users by keeping the kernel as 32-bit.

He mean that Apple locked MacBooks out of using 64bit, for really no reason.

open your applications folder command-click or right click on Safari and select get info, check the open in 32-bit mode check box, close and restart Safari

and here is a better SL feature to Mac hardware compatibility chart

http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/08/24/mac-os...ands-august-28/

According to that chart 64-bit works on my macbook, but it doesnt.

He mean that Apple locked MacBooks out of using 64bit, for really no reason.

According to that chart 64-bit works on my macbook, but it doesnt.

hmm, ok the version didn't change from ADC seed to retail disc as in 10a432, is there however anything they could have done to the retail disc that would lockout some machines that ADC seed does not have?

EDIT:

nevermind i just went back and tried some earlier seeds on my plastic macbook 4,1 it has 64EFI and core 2 duo 64bit and those seeds won't boot 64bit kernel either

Edited by Phantom Helix
Can someone with a store GM / Upgrade do file /mach_kernel and post the results here, I'm wondering if my ADC version has a slight oddity regarding the kernel.

Lucy:~ me$ file /mach_kernel
/mach_kernel: Mach-O universal binary with 3 architectures
/mach_kernel (for architecture x86_64):	Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
/mach_kernel (for architecture i386):	Mach-O executable i386
/mach_kernel (for architecture ppc):	Mach-O executable ppc
Lucy:~ me$ md5 /mach_kernel 
MD5 ("/mach_kernel") = 0617c436d6b4960172066982e05401d4

You guys are completely insane.

64-Bit kernel extensions are disabled by default for compatibility -- if you have a 64bit EFI you can run 64 bit with 64 bit kernel extensions you just need to enable them.

Hold 6 and 4 during boot-up ( 3 and 2 for 32 bit )

OR

Edit /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/com.apple.boot.plist and change

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string></string>

</dict>

to

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string>arch=x86_64</string>

</dict>

Granted I severely doubt any of you need or understand it given the complete inability to google "64 bit snow leopard kernel extensions". Just stay away from it, you don't even need it. Or the ADC build, what a waste.

Granted I severely doubt any of you need or understand it given the complete inability to google "64 bit snow leopard kernel extensions".

You realise that this does not work on a variety of machines that actually do support 64 bit and do have a 64-bit EFI. That's the problem here.

You realise that this does not work on a variety of machines that actually do support 64 bit and do have a 64-bit EFI. That's the problem here.

There was a list of revisions with some issues during the ADC and I'll see if I can track it down I guess. The majority of people here don't fall in to that category though.

You guys are completely insane.

64-Bit kernel extensions are disabled by default for compatibility -- if you have a 64bit EFI you can run 64 bit with 64 bit kernel extensions you just need to enable them.

Hold 6 and 4 during boot-up ( 3 and 2 for 32 bit )

OR

Edit /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/com.apple.boot.plist and change

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string></string>

</dict>

to

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string>arch=x86_64</string>

</dict>

Granted I severely doubt any of you need or understand it given the complete inability to google "64 bit snow leopard kernel extensions". Just stay away from it, you don't even need it. Or the ADC build, what a waste.

Done that.. it doesn't work on my Unibody MacBook

hmm, ok the version didn't change from ADC seed to retail disc as in 10a432, is there however anything they could have done to the retail disc that would lockout some machines that ADC seed does not have?

EDIT:

nevermind i just went back and tried some earlier seeds on my plastic macbook 4,1 it has 64EFI and core 2 duo 64bit and those seeds won't boot 64bit kernel either

I'm a MacBook5,1 and can't do it v.v

Ive been doing some more reading on the web and i think i may have a valid reason some macs won't in 64-bit regardless of a 64-bit processor and EFI64,

it is possible that the specific EFI firmware version for those computers hasn't recieved a proper update to allow it and may possibly get one in the future and apple decided to not delay the release until said updates were ready, considering it won't really hinder 64-bit apps.

a secondary possibility is that 64-bit system hardware drivers for those machines was also not ready and could be available in the near future, and again apple did not see any benefit in delaying release based on that.

take it with a grain of salt, thats my opinion and i am not going to worry about it any longer, i went through all that with Windows 64-bit and it took 3 64-bit OS versions to get where i wanted to be lol

the fact that SL gives me the option and power to switch on the fly is a huge relief.

Clean installed earlier, works perfectly so far. :D

Though one thing, I can't replace my adress book icon anymore. O.o

what is your installed size? on a plastic macbook the installer said mine was going to take 8.05gb with quicktime 7, no printer/languages/fonts/rosetta but finder says 5.57gb on disk

are the system files compressed that far?

Edited by Phantom Helix
what is your installed size? on a plastic macbook the installer said mine was going to take 8.05gb with quicktime 7, no printer/languages/fonts/rosetta but finder says 5.57gb on disk

are the system files compressed that far?

I've installed a bunch of my stuff and put my 40gb of music on now, bit late now, sorry, lol.

Though from memroy with my options it was aorund 8gb, and I think it took about that too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For the purpose that it was built for, it’s a great machine. It’s okay to own multiple machines, it’s okay for machines to be different. If every computer was the same, they’d be boring af.
    • OpenAI is rolling out a major upgrade to ChatGPT memory by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI is rolling out a major upgrade to ChatGPT's memory, making the system more capable, current, and scalable across long-term use. Memory allows ChatGPT to remember useful details about users, including their preferences, projects, and constraints. Instead of starting every conversation from scratch, ChatGPT can use this context to provide more relevant responses in future chats. OpenAI first launched saved memories in February 2024. That feature allowed users to explicitly ask ChatGPT to save information into its memory, such as travel plans or writing preferences. However, this system had limits because it depended heavily on users giving clear instructions to remember something. Additionally, saved memories could become stale over time. In April 2025, OpenAI expanded memory by allowing ChatGPT to reference past chat context outside the saved memories list. This was powered by a background process called “dreaming,” which automatically curates memories from chat history. This made ChatGPT better at learning from natural conversation without requiring users to manually save every detail. Today, OpenAI announced a more capable and compute-efficient memory architecture built on top of dreaming. This new system improves ChatGPT’s ability to carry forward useful context, follow user preferences, and remain accurate as time passes. According to OpenAI’s internal evaluations, the new system improves factual recall from 67.9% in 2025 to 82.8% in 2026. Preference adherence improves from 55.3% to 71.3%, while accuracy over time improves from 52.2% to 75.1%. The best part of this new system is a new memory summary page where users can review ChatGPT's memories. Users can even update details, correct information, or give instructions on what topics ChatGPT should bring up and when. This new, improved memory system is available to ChatGPT Plus and Pro users in the US starting today. It will roll out to more countries, as well as Free and Go users, in the coming weeks.
    • I work for a video production company in Australia. The camera operators shoot footage and then pass the SD card over to the editors. Much easier than handing over the entire camera. Plus, on a busy day you can hand off the SD card and then pop another in for the next shoot. Or, you might have used multiple SD cards because you need the extra space for a long shoot. I also use USB cables and wifi for transferring footage, but in many cases an SD card reader is the easiest method.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!