Wasn't allowed into local rodeo cuz of DSLR


Recommended Posts

So my local rodeo wouldn't allow me into the event because I had a DSLR. After I got home and brooded some, I realized that A LOT of sporting events don't allow people in w/ DSLRs. I find this quite frustrating. It's almost to the point of why bother buying long/fast lenses when you don't have many places you can use them...

*vent*

I smuggled a dSLR in a Cinema just to try and take long exposures while people were watching teh movie, in the end I just forgot about it. :p But to smuggle it in, I just carried my jacket around my arm, with the dSLR in the middle of it covering it up. Then again I was using a small 50mm not a long lense by any means.

Legal solution: Try and get a press pass?

I had the same problem a couple of times - not that many - and now I just email (or call if email won't work) the event manager or organization to see if it's OK - most of the times it is, luckily, if it isn't I'll just say that I sadly won't be attending then. My experience is that when you let them know, they'll be OK with it. Just work out something like how to show proof of you being allowed in etc...

Also, I still have to try to get some form of 'press' pass for some events sometimes...

and... you can always go guerilla :p (not recommended)

Would you have been allowed a standard camera in? I can understand if there's a restriction on all recording equipment (e.g. Cinema) but punishing you just because you have a professional looking camera just seems dumb.

Yea, the lady who stopped me said "If you have a tiny camera I can let you in, but not something like that." .. :/

The problem about smuggling it in is that once you're in there, you'll stick out like a sore thumb. A giant 200mm lens is pretty obvious to spot in a crowd.

spend some money get a lowepro camera bag they are about 90$ http://products.lowepro.com/product/SlingS...0-AW,2034,4.htm

this will make you look more professional.

I have a $120 camera backpack. "Looking more professional" isn't going to do anything if they don't allow DSLRs in their facility... Even if I sneak it in using my "professional looking bag," I'll still stick out like a sore thumb w/ a 200mm lens.

I have a $120 camera backpack. "Looking more professional" isn't going to do anything if they don't allow DSLRs in their facility... Even if I sneak it in using my "professional looking bag," I'll still stick out like a sore thumb w/ a 200mm lens.

they probably just dont want flashes going off. iv done a lot of shots and had no problem

Well on one hand, I support the rights of the rodeo to make their own rules. However, that doesn't mean I agree with the rules :)

With the logic they have, I could bring in my Canon HF100 camcorder (which is smaller than my DSLR I might add) and record in 1080p :D

As for the junior soccer league - I'd like to see them enforce that fine...and if you can't take pics of your own kids, then they should be required to supply you with an unlimited number of professional quality shots that you could have taken.

I'm running into a similar situation. The hospitals are no longer allowing cameras or camcorders, so when my wife is in labor soon, I won't be able to capture the moment. It doesn't appear that they even offer any sort of photography, but they claim it is for liability issues. I can understand, but if something goes wrong and they don't let me take pictures, then that looks like proof against them if anything...

But back on topic, certain places need to realize that DSLRs are commonplace now and not that expensive. If you only have the stock lens, it looks like an old 35mm camera depending on what model you have...

i doubt you would even need a flash at a rodeo if you were using a 200mm lens.

i have been looking around and general ruleing for sports etc is "no DSLR's" and give no reason, atall, maybe some places are scared about security ?

however... we then get back to the "Point and shoot can take photos of exactly the same thing" problem

I've read the entire thread and perhaps I missed it but no one has mentioned copyright! Perhaps the organizers of these events feel that you could sell professional shots and make money out of their show as opposed to people with crappy cameras that will only produce happy snaps! Just a thought!

I've read the entire thread and perhaps I missed it but no one has mentioned copyright! Perhaps the organizers of these events feel that you could sell professional shots and make money out of their show as opposed to people with crappy cameras that will only produce happy snaps! Just a thought!

This.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Huh? I have an Aeron Remastered and the backrest cannot go up or down (only the lumbar is adjustable). Yes, the Doro C300 Pro V2's backrest can be locked, but the locking mechanism is so weak that when you recline and lean back the backrest moves with your body. I think the whole purpose of this chair is that all of the moving parts (except for the rocking, which can be locked in place) are supposed to move with your body, as you shift your weight, that's why I couldn't get used to it. Some people might like it though. Its redeeming factor is the price, I mean it costs like a quarter of what a new Herman MIller (Aeron) costs.
    • Well done Massie. This is how to treat the Fox News filth.   
    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!