Wasn't allowed into local rodeo cuz of DSLR


Recommended Posts

So my local rodeo wouldn't allow me into the event because I had a DSLR. After I got home and brooded some, I realized that A LOT of sporting events don't allow people in w/ DSLRs. I find this quite frustrating. It's almost to the point of why bother buying long/fast lenses when you don't have many places you can use them...

*vent*

I smuggled a dSLR in a Cinema just to try and take long exposures while people were watching teh movie, in the end I just forgot about it. :p But to smuggle it in, I just carried my jacket around my arm, with the dSLR in the middle of it covering it up. Then again I was using a small 50mm not a long lense by any means.

Legal solution: Try and get a press pass?

I had the same problem a couple of times - not that many - and now I just email (or call if email won't work) the event manager or organization to see if it's OK - most of the times it is, luckily, if it isn't I'll just say that I sadly won't be attending then. My experience is that when you let them know, they'll be OK with it. Just work out something like how to show proof of you being allowed in etc...

Also, I still have to try to get some form of 'press' pass for some events sometimes...

and... you can always go guerilla :p (not recommended)

Would you have been allowed a standard camera in? I can understand if there's a restriction on all recording equipment (e.g. Cinema) but punishing you just because you have a professional looking camera just seems dumb.

Yea, the lady who stopped me said "If you have a tiny camera I can let you in, but not something like that." .. :/

The problem about smuggling it in is that once you're in there, you'll stick out like a sore thumb. A giant 200mm lens is pretty obvious to spot in a crowd.

spend some money get a lowepro camera bag they are about 90$ http://products.lowepro.com/product/SlingS...0-AW,2034,4.htm

this will make you look more professional.

I have a $120 camera backpack. "Looking more professional" isn't going to do anything if they don't allow DSLRs in their facility... Even if I sneak it in using my "professional looking bag," I'll still stick out like a sore thumb w/ a 200mm lens.

I have a $120 camera backpack. "Looking more professional" isn't going to do anything if they don't allow DSLRs in their facility... Even if I sneak it in using my "professional looking bag," I'll still stick out like a sore thumb w/ a 200mm lens.

they probably just dont want flashes going off. iv done a lot of shots and had no problem

Well on one hand, I support the rights of the rodeo to make their own rules. However, that doesn't mean I agree with the rules :)

With the logic they have, I could bring in my Canon HF100 camcorder (which is smaller than my DSLR I might add) and record in 1080p :D

As for the junior soccer league - I'd like to see them enforce that fine...and if you can't take pics of your own kids, then they should be required to supply you with an unlimited number of professional quality shots that you could have taken.

I'm running into a similar situation. The hospitals are no longer allowing cameras or camcorders, so when my wife is in labor soon, I won't be able to capture the moment. It doesn't appear that they even offer any sort of photography, but they claim it is for liability issues. I can understand, but if something goes wrong and they don't let me take pictures, then that looks like proof against them if anything...

But back on topic, certain places need to realize that DSLRs are commonplace now and not that expensive. If you only have the stock lens, it looks like an old 35mm camera depending on what model you have...

i doubt you would even need a flash at a rodeo if you were using a 200mm lens.

i have been looking around and general ruleing for sports etc is "no DSLR's" and give no reason, atall, maybe some places are scared about security ?

however... we then get back to the "Point and shoot can take photos of exactly the same thing" problem

I've read the entire thread and perhaps I missed it but no one has mentioned copyright! Perhaps the organizers of these events feel that you could sell professional shots and make money out of their show as opposed to people with crappy cameras that will only produce happy snaps! Just a thought!

I've read the entire thread and perhaps I missed it but no one has mentioned copyright! Perhaps the organizers of these events feel that you could sell professional shots and make money out of their show as opposed to people with crappy cameras that will only produce happy snaps! Just a thought!

This.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • SpaceX took its largest step yet toward becoming a retail wireless carrier on Friday when President and COO Gwynne Shotwell told investors at the company's IPO roadshow that SpaceX is considering launching a Starlink-branded mobile phone service for US consumers.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319177/20260627/starlink-mobile-coming-t-verizon-spacex-has-spectrum-still-needs-towers.htm  
    • Stop asking people that. It's a "No True Scotsman" argument in that you are attempting to discredit the opinions of a person by Attacking the Messenger. The reason that these are logical fallacies is the TRUTH is based on facts as supported by evidence. Nothing else. So, always debate the facts with evidence to reach the truth. Once you learn to do this, you'll be able to recognize when people are fearmongering and lying to you for their own selfish ends.
    • It doesn't matter if you didn't directly hear it from person X or Y. Every one of your statements comes straight from the racist, skinhead, anti-immigrant, be afraid of everything, "they are all taking our jobs", etc. etc. mouthpieces. That's where Farag and Putin heard it from too...and used it against the UK. So, while you keep disavowing the people who publicly peddled that position, you keep proving over and over again that those lies influenced you into being tricked when the Brexit vote came around too. In fact, your final sentence makes it crystal clear that it was the racist/anti-immigrant lies you fell and voted for, since you stated that you didn't have an issue with the economic trade issues with the EU. Ahem. To be clear, all of these LIES are EONS old, mate. They are the same fearmongering lies peddled to the same ignorant, gullible cowards by the same charlatans, snake-oil salesmen, and would be demagogues who've been doing this since caveman Ugh lied about his slightly different neighbor in order to steal his land. And, finally, you answered your own previous question. The reason that the EU isn't clamoring to bring the UK back is that they have had enough of people who would rather shoot themselves in the foot than get over their "insecurity issues". It's the same reason the entire world is moving away from the USA as fast as it can...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!