Photoshop CS4 m379 released


Recommended Posts

The Photoshop CS4 (Stonehenge) build 20080609.m.379 (both Win and Mac) is now available for download.

Also available are the optional plug-in for Win and Mac.

The build and the plug-in are available via the ’Download Software’ link on the main left nav menu.

KNOWN ISSUES

- Action & Posterize: playing "Make Posterize adjustment layer" with modal turned on leads to crash

- GPU: OGL: Opening an image with OGL on crashes PS. ATI x1900

- When you try to reinstall build 379 on a Windows machine on which 379 has been installed previously you get a "Done, with errors" message.

Workaround 1- Install PS build 379, Launch PS, Uninstall PS, Uninstall Adobe Media Player, Install PS build x379

Workaround 2 - Install PS build 379, Launch PS, Uninstall PS, Install PS on installation options screen uncheck Adobe Media Player (AMP)

Feel free to contact me in case of any issues.

Regards,

VK.

20080616-1u43dwn7x54bcb2dthxgmg5f2x.jpg

The new unified interface works BRILLIANTLY. I love it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/643629-photoshop-cs4-m379-released/
Share on other sites

^ Even though I don't like having a separate user interface, I've wanted them to lose those for so long, they look terrible when stretched.

Looks a little odd at first glance, especially the titlebar buttons, I don't like them trying to develop their own unique interface, but at least the color scheme matches Leopards.

Hopefully windowed mode will look nicer than fullscreen. At least the palettes look better, less bulky. Lets hope the software is less buggy :)

They should drop the Aqua drop-down menus.

In favour of what?

I can see why, unformity is a key factor in a majority of pro applications, and adobe are wanting to continue in that direction - so I'll put in a feature request for that. Good call.

^ Even though I don't like having a separate user interface, I've wanted them to lose those for so long, they look terrible when stretched.

Looks a little odd at first glance, especially the titlebar buttons, I don't like them trying to develop their own unique interface, but at least the color scheme matches Leopards.

Hopefully windowed mode will look nicer than fullscreen. At least the palettes look better, less bulky. Lets hope the software is less buggy :)

If you're assuming the screen shot is full screen, you're wrong - It's windowed mode.

Overall loading times are noticeably faster, even for a preliminary build it's exciting. The Bridge beta is also lightning fast in comparison.

I really don't get why they junked all that stuff in the title bar. That toolbar that sits right underneath the title bar is where all that should go. Also, is there an option to display palettes like in CS3 (Little icons docked to the side)? Nothing beats only having a palette out when you need it.

What does the ESSENTIALS menu contain?

I really don't get why they junked all that stuff in the title bar. That toolbar that sits right underneath the title bar is where all that should go. Also, is there an option to display palettes like in CS3 (Little icons docked to the side)? Nothing beats only having a palette out when you need it.

What does the ESSENTIALS menu contain?

Trust me, upon using it, the placing of all new features in the title bar is perfect. It uses up otherwise useless space, and allows for a far nicer work environment. When I first saw screenshots I was put off too, but actually using it, it's a no-brainer.

The ESSENTIALS drop-down basically houses the different types of displays/shortcut keys available. Your 'workspace' in CS3.

20080617-rfw4fm62swdm1y4yw1yh9disxd.jpg

Also yes, you can just display one pallet with the docked icons. Features aren't being removed here, just added and unified!

20080617-jhenypxjaa72tur3juj4578due.jpg

i dont understand the 'unified' ui?

will it be unified with other Adobe applications? forexample i can have a dreamweaver file open in one tab, and a psd in another? or am i getting the wrong message...?

The interface of most adobe applications differ. This approach is to make them all practically the same, ala Apple Pro Applications. It allows for an easier and more productive way to work with the suite.

The tabs are merely for the documents you have open in that particular application. No, you won't be able to switch applications through tabs.

Wouldn't this be a more correct way of doing it?

psa55fb.jpg

Except it could look like a unified toolbar. It just seems silly to have stuff in the title bar when there is empty space in the toolbar right underneath the title bar.

You have to remember the toolbar is interchangable dependant upon what tool you have selected. Ergo can expand and decrease in real estate. Putting those few quick shortcuts on the titlebar is saving space as well as keeping the interface from being overly cluttered.

Like I said, using the application as is and seeing screenshots of it seem to produce 2 very different views on it. Keep an open mind, and when you come actually testing it out, I'm sure you'll be appreciative of its placement.

I know I, and many others in the discussion forums welcome this change.

No tool has enough items in that toolbar to expand into the area on the right. You mention it being space saving, but you are actually taking up more vertical space by increasing the title bar size in addition to tabs. Vertical space is much more important on todays widescreen monitors. Also, why is the hand, magnifying glass and zoom drop down present in the title bar when they are present elsewhere. Taking those out would minimise the amount of items and thus the rest could be stuck in that toolbar.

I know seeing and using are two different things, but at the moment all I can do is look and judge what I see. I'll definitely keep an open mind when I do get to test it though.

No tool has enough items in that toolbar to expand into the area on the right. You mention it being space saving, but you are actually taking up more vertical space by increasing the title bar size in addition to tabs. Vertical space is much more important on todays widescreen monitors. Also, why is the hand, magnifying glass and zoom drop down present in the title bar when they are present elsewhere. Taking those out would minimise the amount of items and thus the rest could be stuck in that toolbar.

I know seeing and using are two different things, but at the moment all I can do is look and judge what I see. I'll definitely keep an open mind when I do get to test it though.

I did a little more digging round, and found that just like all the...frankly controversial elements of CS4 - it's user removable

20080617-dm1qpqwxcyhsb1erfhcwmppykg.jpg

You cannot, however as of yet - remove the toolbar when in the 'Application Frame' mode (i.e. not a solid unified interface, but the CS3 multi-window style)

I'll also put in a feature request to allow that to happen, although the option is currently grayed out - so I think it's a hard coded part of using the Applicaton Frame.

They should use the drop-down menus in iTunes 7, they would blend much better into the CS4 UI.

Noted. I don't think they'll take my input to that extent, but something consistent with their effort on neutralising the interface in terms of colours should spark something! I mean they decided to grey out the traffic lights, why not this?

Thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!