Sir Topham Hatt Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Thanks for reading :) I have around ?350/?400 to spend on a new lens. I currently have a D60 with the kit 18-55 lens. I was looking at the Nikon 70 - 300mm VR Lens (?304) which seemed great but then I also saw the Nikkor Macro Lens (?495). I usually take photos of landscape or urban street shots so personally think I would get more use out of the . I guess I just wanted to know what others look for when purchasing a new lens? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 well neither of those lenses are good for landscape or urban street shots. Since you have a D60, your limited on what you can get. I say stick with what you have, learn to shoot RAW and post process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FizzyChickenBroth Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 If you're looking to do urban street shots and landscapes, you're actually not going to benefit from either of those lens. You want versatility. For your scope, you need something fairly wide for landscapes to normal perspective for urban shooting. The 18-200 lens is probably the best lens as far as versatility goes. What to look for when buying lens: 1. consider your price cap - lens get expensive...quickly 2. after realizing your price cap, consider your application - shooting landscapes usually means you want wide (16-35mm range), shooting people usually means you want more normal (35-85mm range), and wildlife/event photography means telephoto (70-600mm range). Of course, rules can always be broken when necessary, but not always practically 3. when you've decided which lens range you want, look at the fastest speed. f/2.8 or lower is considered fast. faster = less blur in darker settings such as indoors/evening when shooting without a flash. Typically, any zoom lens at 2.8 tends to get pretty pricey. Since you're a Nikon shooter, you don't have many primes to select from. Primes usually start at about 2.0 and lower. They're mega fast lens, but you lose your ability to zoom. That's what feet are for :) 4. buy that lens after you've found the fastest, most applicable lens you can afford In photography, lens is an investment. Unlike your camera, your lens value will be worth almost the same 10 yrs from now depending on the condition of the lens and how good it is. If it's a crappy lens, it's not worth much later, but a pro lens does not depreciate much at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giga Veteran Posted July 1, 2008 Veteran Share Posted July 1, 2008 Do you want a lens to replace your current kit lens? As said, a wide angle would be nice for landscapes--those you listed are telephotos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Topham Hatt Posted July 1, 2008 Author Share Posted July 1, 2008 Hmm. Thanks. I am still learning about photography and SLR stuff as I am sure you can tell! Can anyone suggest a good wide angle lens to use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giga Veteran Posted July 1, 2008 Veteran Share Posted July 1, 2008 sigma 10-20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts