Recommended Posts

I haven't seen that in any of the update info since I have gotten TF2 (a month ago) and I have gotten 1-hit killed by pipe grenades a ton.....they can still do up to 132 dmg without getting a crit, so they are still potentially lethal to 125hp classes.

Yep, pipes are the strongest weapons in the game.

But it only rarely goes over 125 damage now :)

Hmmm I didn't think pipes could go over 125, I play demo quite a lot and since the update I haven't 1 hit a scout on full health but I kill lots of scouts with my pipes.

I hate a demo who can aim, most of the time I get killed by a demo its either due to stickies, or a single pipe to the face :( If the first pipe doesn't kill me, I'm outta there before they can finish me off.

Bad scout :p, keep strafing left and right and double jump over the demo. He should be dead by then. A few weeks ago I was playing on a pub arena server and it was me (heavy) versus a really good scout. To make things better for me I was also using Natascha. The scout runs at me from behind, one shot at the start and then the second shot, double jumps over my head and gets two shots on me and I'm dead. It was a wtf moment.

There's a post on the TF2 blog about Valve taking steps to delist the bad servers, it's mainly going to effect the ones using the fake players plugins.

Getting rid of those, and filtering out the nocrit/allcrit/fastspawn/instaspawn/etc. servers should lead to finding (hopefully) good servers. Now if only I could filter out the crappy ones with HLstatsX.

Edit: Oh yeah, the post

Two of the servers I play on use fast respawn (not insta) on the 2fort servers only, otherwise the arena and payload servers are vanilla save for SourceMods and HLStatsX. While I'd hate to see it delisted just because of fast respawn, I don't see too many fast quitters as people can rack up to 2+ hours per gaming session.

What do you find crappy about HLStatsX? Is it the amount of text spamming it does on some servers?

edit: reading the graph, it seems like there's a relatively small amount of servers that are "bad." So there's probably little to worry about if you play on large community servers. It's those random forthelulz servers that should get the boot.

edit 2: This may be a BIG problem for servers who have reserved slots. Some people repeatedly join and get kicked when a server's player count is right below the reserved slot threshold - according to this system the server is 'bad' for having players repeatedly drop out because they haven't paid for their slots.

Edited by rm20010

HLstatsX just spams things all the time, I don't need to know the time, or that the server is running it, or that the server has a website (which was mentioned in the MOTD) or that I just killed or built a sentry, the game already tells me about those.

And hopefully the reserved slot plugins will die, Source already provides a nicer method of having reserved slots that doesn't involve kicking people. But unfortunately I don't think it's going to do much against crappy fastspawn/instaspawn ones.

I agree that some servers are really spammy with HLStatsX. Some aren't though.

The points system from HLStatsX is fine; sure it could get annoying when it constantly tells you that you got points for killing someone or building sentries, but how else would it notify you of point gains? (unless there's a client-side cvar that allows you to turn those messages off) Plus on our community's servers, the points system is also used to give free reserved slots to the top five people who accumulate the most points.

As for the reserved slot kicking, I agree that it's very annoying to get booted out after the game spends half a minute loading the map. But it's possible that server admins use this as it's easier to track those who paid for subscriptions via the server's website and sync it with the list of players who have reserved slots.

Reserve Slots just need to disappear from this game completely. I don't care how good you are, how much you pay, or hell, how much you sleep with the server admin. You should have to wait to play just like everyone else.

Someone's paying for those servers, and it's upto them however they want to run it. If it's not you then there are hundreds of other servers to choose from. :)

Someone's paying for those servers, and it's upto them however they want to run it. If it's not you then there are hundreds of other servers to choose from. :)

Not quite. When you filter out all the ones that ping above 100, as well as all the ones that are 24/7 2fort/some-other-bad-map, and THEN remove all the ones that only have 5 people instead of the, say, 20 it claims then you get quite a bit less than hundreds. Hell, you might not even hit 100 servers.

Not quite. When you filter out all the ones that ping above 100, as well as all the ones that are 24/7 2fort/some-other-bad-map, and THEN remove all the ones that only have 5 people instead of the, say, 20 it claims then you get quite a bit less than hundreds. Hell, you might not even hit 100 servers.

The majority of the servers available for me under 100 ping are of the crappy kind.

Reserve

Slots just need to disappear from this game completely. I don't care how good you are, how much you pay, or hell, how much you sleep with the server admin. You should have to wait to play just like everyone else.

They need to have incentives to get people to donate to keep those servers alive...

Just like on this site, being a subscriber means the ability to edit thread titles, and not waiting 30 seconds between searches and posting new topics.

Yeah, some people need to realise that running servers for a community is not cheap. :/ It is better to have the system where reserved slots are just an overflow of the server slots, so there are 2 hidden slots on the server, if they are filled then the next time a public slot opens up (someone leaves the server) someone in the reserved slots is opened up so another person with a reserved slot can join.

Yeah, I'd prefer overflow as well. That way TF2's auto server connector can work properly instead of making people constantly ping the server to see if the number of players falls under 30 or 28 (assuming 32 man server).

I thought most servers implemented the overflow slot now rather than only allowing say 22/24 because there's 2 reserved slots?

Reserve Slots just need to disappear from this game completely. I don't care how good you are, how much you pay, or hell, how much you sleep with the server admin. You should have to wait to play just like everyone else.

If I was paying for a server I'd want a reserved slot. Why should I have to wait like everyone else if I contribute towards the runnings costs of the server?

Now all you sandman haters can relax. It's been nerfed to a point in which it's nearly not worth using anymore. And of course, still no multicore support to add to the let-downs.

Gameplay Changes

* Players who are stunned by a Scout now take 50% less damage

* Increased the minimum distance to stun a player with the Sandman

Fixes

* Fixed problem where clients were unable to join a team or maintain a connection to the server

* Fixed Scout taunt kill achievement firing for people who didn't actually qualify

* Fixed client crash in when creating muzzle flash effects

* Fixed client crash when determining which disguise weapon to use for a spy

* Fixed Natascha's chain not being drawn on the view model

* Fixed stun code regression that resulted in a subtle reduction of Natascha's slowdown effect

* Fixed rocket & grenade jumps not propelling players as far as they're supposed to

I thought most servers implemented the overflow slot now rather than only allowing say 22/24 because there's 2 reserved slots?

If I was paying for a server I'd want a reserved slot. Why should I have to wait like everyone else if I contribute towards the runnings costs of the server?

Most servers i see only allow 31/32 or 30/32.(for example)

If you're the admin himself, then it's fine. But i'm sure you can come up with a better reward for any donater than randomly kicking people who are trying* to enjoy the game.

*why i starred trying is because enjoying the game can be quite difficult since valve will never do anything to lessen the constant team stacking.

Now all you sandman haters can relax. It's been nerfed to a point in which it's nearly not worth using anymore. And of course, still no multicore support to add to the let-downs.

Most servers i see only allow 31/32 or 30/32.(for example)

If you're the admin himself, then it's fine. But i'm sure you can come up with a better reward for any donater than randomly kicking people who are trying* to enjoy the game.

*why i starred trying is because enjoying the game can be quite difficult since valve will never do anything to lessen the constant team stacking.

Great update! Pity about the MC support. Hopefully that'll come soon. The Sandman was starting to get too annoying. Yeah I agree with you there, I didn't just mean any donator. I meant more if every month I was contributing to the cost of running the server rather than a one off fee to get a reserved slot from then on.

With our servers, you get points for the time played on the server, and you can spend these points on setting the next map, spray permits and a reserved slot. We use the overflow system anyway, we try and attract people to our servers, so whats the point of kicking them :p

The sandman can still stun ubers, so it still potentially can be overpowered in defence, hopefully the -50% damage will stop anyone from using it. I think they should just scrap it as a weapon and create a new one but this is never going to happen :p The scout update was a failure imo.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!