[Cancelled] Caprica (Season 1)


Recommended Posts

filler episode, on the third episode?!. Give me a break. In the other hand, too much make up. The girl and the others (very) mature women wont look any younger because more make up wont hide what it really is. The 'girl' on her 23 (I think) wont look like a 15yo girl ever.

And about the episode, its how I said above, was nothing. It wasnt a good episode, either, because of that. If they have an episode like this at the beginning, this series is doomed.

Could someone help me out: where did we see Dr. Janet Frasier, and that BSG girl...? I don't recall seeing them in Caprica.

dr janet was in the court with Adama and the bsg girl worked as a advisor to graystone

Mi3JE.jpg

Even though this show has said over and over that it's separate from Battlestar Galactica, the producers are now hinting that we'll eventually dovetail with the history of the Final Five, who started their new "lives" on Caprica. Says producer Jane Espenson, "If you actually do the math, the [human-Cylon] war starts about five years from where our characters are in Caprica." (But didn't the Final Five only arrive at the end of the war, not the beginning?)

wKmTY.jpg

In related news, the producers have already contacted Lucy Lawless about reprising her role as D'Anna - which is also very confusing. (Will we meet the human that the Cylon D'Anna was based on? Or are we actually going to see the creation of the eight "skinjobs" from BSG? The timeline seems all wrong, based on what Ellen and Sam told us.) [TV Guide]

I would lile a lot from the Caprica series, including:

1. Creation of the [12-Colonies] Cylons (done, mmmm Zoe).

2. Start of the first Cylon war.

3. Commissioning of Galatica (it was 50 years old when it was being decommisioned, which means 10 years into the series, she's got to be built.)

4. Arrival of the final five.

5. Creation of the first 8 models, with focus on the creation of Cavil, and destruction of Daniel.

6. Planting of Cylon skinjob agents (like Boomer).

7. Cavil's revolt, and the planting of the final five in the fleet.

8. More history of the 13th Colony

Thats my wishlist anyway. Oh and,

9. Zoe. Naked.

here's hoping it does. I'm loving what I have seen so far

yeah same

the ratings are saying otherwise 1.1m last episode which is very low infact it was beaten by swamp loggers on discovery :unsure:

Syfy Standing Firmly Behind 'Caprica'

EXCLUSIVE: Network EVP of original programming Mark Stern says 'Battlestar Galactica' spinoff is here for the long haul

By MICHAEL HINMAN Feb-18-2010 Source: Airlock Alpha

Thanks to the Internet and a thirst for information, television fans in 2010 are far more savvy than they have ever been before.

Blogs, message boards, even Twitter are filled with discussions dissecting ratings, audience attitude and instant reactions to just about anything that pops up on the boob tube. But while smarter viewers typically result in smarter programs, it can sometimes backfire into rampant speculation that could help bury a show.

That's exactly what Syfy doesn't want to happen to its newest series "Caprica." And no matter what Entertainment Weekly's Michael Ausiello wants to predict with his cable scorecard, network executives say the "Battlestar Galactica" spinoff is here to stay.

"We're definitely with 'Caprica' for the long haul," Syfy's EVP of original programming Mark Stern told Airlock Alpha Thursday. "There's no question about it. We knew exactly what it was not going to be, that is an easily adopted show. It's not 'Battlestar Galactica,' it's its own animal. And we definitely recognize that it's going to find its audience and it's going to grow its audience."

Will "Caprica" ever be the top-rated series on Syfy? Most likely not. But then again, neither was "Battlestar," and that show has become iconically linked with the network.

Live viewership numbers are important, but for a tech-savvy audience like science-fiction fans, so are timeshifted audiences. Syfy just received the first batch of numbers this week for "Caprica" tracking viewers who recorded the second episode of the series and watched it within a week, known as Live+7. Those numbers were better than the network anticipated, Stern said, and actually propelled "Caprica" into the top 10 for cable that night.

"We're certainly not sharpening the axe by any stretch of the imagination," Stern said. "We all really believe in the show, and it has a lot of potential."

...

The rest of the article has a few points which might be kind of spoilerish.

http://www.airlockalpha.com/node/7148

A lil shocking at the beginning in this lastest ep. Like always happend with galactica now with caprica. What was that?. A lesbian cougar, a lesbian japanese milf, a teenager and a black guy. Do I forget sowething?. Im sure they dont. Lol.

In the other hand this show has some details that I really like. When the guy was changing the radio station and sounds the original song of galactica, in the tv show, where you see "all" the backstage (where the anchorman should stay, the guy making the ppl applause, etc). Actually the tv show was the most important part of this episode, where the guy jokes over and over again with the parents and he doesnt left nothing in the air and using the parents words against them.

Somehow Daniel Graystone makes me remember Dr. from Bladerunner (probably they want that, but then were bio-bots, heh). More when he was on the bed ;)

Its a good show. By far better episode than the last week, where was just a filler episode. I hope this show stay in this line.

lol @ MicroCrap haha (microcapr, I know). :p

And they better explain how they have the constellations FROM earth, because they are far far away from here...

Maybe they just used the same names when they came to earth and the star positions for the constellations are different.

This is hands-down my favourite show of 2010, loving the story unravelling each week - is it wrong to find all the women in it hot though? Aren't they like, 16?

Also just noticed that the guy who plays Bill Adama's dad was in Burn Notice as a shop-keeper...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!