World's oldest Bible - ressurection part missing?

[brentaal]

The oldest surviving copy of the New Testament, a 4th century version that had its Gospels and epistles spread across the world, is being made whole again -- online.

The British Library says the full text of the Codex Sinaiticus will be available to Web users by next July, digitally reconnecting parts that are held in Britain, Russia, Germany and a monastery in Egypt's Sinai Desert.

A preview of the Codex, which also has some parts of the Old Testament, will hit the Web on Thursday -- the Book of Psalms and the Gospel of Mark.

"Only a few people have ever had the opportunity to see more than a couple of pages of the (Codex)," said Scot McKendrick, the British Library's head of Western manuscripts. The Web site will give everyone access to a "unique treasure," he said.

Discovered at the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Mount Sinai by German Bible scholar Constantine Tischendorf in the mid-19th century, much of the Codex eventually wound up in Russia -- just how exactly the British Library won't say, citing lingering sensitivity over the circumstances surrounding its removal from the monastery.

The British Library bought 347 pages from Soviet authorities in 1933. Forty-three pages are at the University Library in Leipzig, Germany, and six fragments are at the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg. And in 1975, monks stumbled on 12 more pages and 40 fragments stashed in a hidden room at the monastery.

Biblical scholars are thrilled at the news that the Codex Sinaiticus -- divided since Tischendorf's trip to the monastery in 1844 -- is finally being put back together, albeit virtually.

In the past, anyone wishing to examine the document first hand would have had to approach the British Library "on bended knee," said Christopher Tuckett, a professor of New Testament studies at Oxford University.

"To have it available just at the click of a button is fantastic," he said. "You could do in two seconds what would take hours and hours of flicking through the leaves."

Handwritten in Greek more than 1,600 years ago - it isn't exactly clear where - the surviving 400 or so pages carry a version of the New Testament that has a few interesting differences from the Bible used by Christians today.

The Gospel of Mark ends abruptly after Jesus' disciples discover his empty tomb, for example. Mark's last line has them leaving in fear.

"It cuts out the post-resurrection stories," said Juan Garces, curator of the Codex Sinaiticus Project. "That's a very odd way of ending a Gospel."

James Davila, a professor of early Jewish studies at St. Andrews University in Scotland, said the Codex also includes religious works foreign to the Roman Catholic and Protestant canons -- such as the "Epistle of Barnabas" and the "Shepherd of Hermas," a book packed with visions and parables.

Davila stressed that did not mean the works were necessarily considered Scripture by early Christians: They could have been bound with the Bible to save money.

The Codex itself is a fascinating artifact, representing the best of Western bookmaking, Garces said. The parchment was arranged in little multipage booklets called quires, which were then numbered in sequence.

"It was the cutting edge of technology in the 4th century," he said.

The British Library bound its quires into two volumes after their purchase from the Soviets, one of which is kept on show in a climate-controlled, bulletproof display case. Visitors can peer at the ancient book, but only see two pages at a time.

By next July, the entire Codex will be available for free -- along with transcription, translation and search functions - on the Internet.

Source

nbc10.com

[shakey_snake]

The "short ending" of Mark has been known to be in some ancient manuscripts for quite a long time. :sleep:

I'm sure this is type of news is shocking to people who don't study the Bible.

But there are even older fragments and/or complete manuscripts of Mark that contain both endings. Almost any good bible you can find in a store will document these different endings somehow, usually with a footnotes.

Edited July 22, 2008 by shakey_snake

[NateB1]

Edit: ^^ Exactly

Nothing to see here, move along... :rolleyes:

This sounds like they could have been part of some Gnostic works - the Gnostics denied all sorts of things. Or, it could have been any number of cults. In practically almost any cult, the resurrection of Jesus and/or His deity is the first to go - the cults liked to put an emphasis (and still do) on man doing something to earn salvation.

What is interesting, though, is that if you take quotes from the early church fathers, written in the very first centuries, waay before this document was dated, you can reconstruct almost the entire gospels, except for like 10 verses or so. The resurrection is part of their quotes. Combining that with fragments found at 110 AD and later, we have the most accurate, trustworthy set of 32,000 manuscripts of any historical document of all time.

[thejohnnyq]

There actual are several version, of the books, and that is because they were hand made copies, and were not completed all the way. A Friend of mine talked about this, and has actual been on of the few to read some of these, and he pointed out that because they were copies, not everything was copied, or there was not time to complete the copies, because Christianity was illegal and the punishment was death, so all your stuff was destroyed, and nothing was passed around.

(He is a well known Biblical scholar, (Douglas Jacoby), and even worked on the Passion of Christ movie, teaching them the the proper way to speak), and has done a lot of work along these lines.)