Microsoft confirms IE 8 will ship this year


Recommended Posts

Care to elaborate how huge? IE 7 is enough for the mainstream users.

It's honestly massive. The jump from IE7 to IE8 completely re-writes the rendering engine. IE8 now renders things the way the specifications says they should be rendered. They're not also supporting more than they did in the past. This update is going to save web developers LOTS of time and money (assuming most people will upgrade)

It's honestly massive. The jump from IE7 to IE8 completely re-writes the rendering engine. IE8 now renders things the way the specifications says they should be rendered. They're not also supporting more than they did in the past. This update is going to save web developers LOTS of time and money (assuming most people will upgrade)

that's the sad part, there are many people who will still use IE6 after IE8 comes out. So in reality IE8 will probably lead to more work for web developers. Currently I have to check my websites to work under IE6, IE7 and Firefox (and I secretly check them under Opera too, although it's not required by my boss). After IE8 release, it will most likely be that I have to check my websites under IE6, IE7, IE8 and Firefox. And since IE8 still has its own quirks, that just means even more work to do. I'd rather just put a tag to force it to work in IE7 emulation mode. But if IE8 beta 1 is any indication, even the IE7 emulation mode is not 100% same as IE7, I already have an ajax tree builder in one of my websites not working correctly in IE8 even in IE7 emulation mode, and I still have no idea what causes the problem (albeit I'm not really trying too hard to solve the problem since it's just beta 1).

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

that's the sad part, there are many people who will still use IE6 after IE8 comes out. So in reality IE8 will probably lead to more work for web developers. Currently I have to check my websites to work under IE6, IE7 and Firefox (and I secretly check them under Opera too, although it's not required by my boss). After IE8 release, it will most likely be that I have to check my websites under IE6, IE7, IE8 and Firefox. And since IE8 still has its own quirks, that just means even more work to do. I'd rather just put a tag to force it to work in IE7 emulation mode. But if IE8 beta 1 is any indication, even the IE7 emulation mode is not 100% same as IE7, I already have an ajax tree builder in one of my websites not working correctly in IE8 even in IE7 emulation mode, and I still have no idea what causes the problem (albeit I'm not really trying too hard to solve the problem since it's just beta 1).

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

once IE8 comes out just drop support for IE6 and 7. You don't support Firefox 1 or 2, or Opera 7 or 8, so why should you support outdated IE versions? (Ok, maybe version 7 too since you might still be supporting Fx2)

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

Well given that IE8 should be much closer to a Standards-Compliant browser, there should be less cross-browser programming because provided you script your site to be HTML/XTML compliant, then it should render almost identically in all browsers. That's the entire point of W3C standards.

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

Uuummm no, This is a MUCH needed change that will make things much easier for web devs. IE8's Major change is a more standards complaint rendering engine! This is what web devs have been begging ms for years and years.

once IE8 comes out just drop support for IE6 and 7. You don't support Firefox 1 or 2, or Opera 7 or 8, so why should you support outdated IE versions? (Ok, maybe version 7 too since you might still be supporting Fx2)

because I'll be fired if I tell me boss I'll drop support for IE6? I don't know about you, but that sounds good enough reason for me, and my living depends on it. I won't be able to find any web developing job if I tell people I don't code for IE6 :wacko:

Well given that IE8 should be much closer to a Standards-Compliant browser, there should be less cross-browser programming because provided you script your site to be HTML/XTML compliant, then it should render almost identically in all browsers. That's the entire point of W3C standards.

well, there should be LESS cross-browser programming IF people stops using IE6 and IE7 the day IE8 comes out. But since many people will still use IE6 and IE7, and you can't exactly feed the same HTML to IE8 and Firefox, that means even more cross-browser programming :(

Uuummm no, This is a MUCH needed change that will make things much easier for web devs. IE8's Major change is a more standards complaint rendering engine! This is what web devs have been begging ms for years and years.

Uuummm NO, your "will make things much easier" is not relevant to what I have posted here, if you have actually read through it instead of seeing only what you wanted to see yourself.

WILL make thing easier for web devs five years in the future? maybe, that's a good possibility. However when it comes to the internet, no one can really predict what will happen five years in the future. Maybe people will all use Firefox or Opera by that time :p But it surely will make things harder for web devs NOW. web devs wants the whole browser market conforming to open standards, but currently we will more likely to get 20% IE6, 30% IE7, 20% IE8, 20% Firefox, 10% others in next year, which will be a hell for web devs :wacko:

And by web devs I mean those like myself who program for a company to make a living, who are forced to code for IE6. When you are working to code websites to feed yourself and your family everyday, you tend to think less about the ideal future a decade later, but more about what you have to code tomorrow :huh:

I said "In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers", I'm not talking about an idealized future where people all upgrade to the latest IE and IE becomes fully standards compliant. And sincerely I don't think the adoption rate of IE8 will be too high considering a lot of the IE users tend to just use whatever comes with their OS, IE6 comes with XP, IE7 comes with Vista, those IE users just aren't used to download standalone browser installs as Firefox and Opera users. So I highly doubt many IE users will download and install IE8 when it's not bundled with an OS.

iirc IE8 retains a memory of all the current tabs open so that if it crashes it can reload them. That is huge for end users.

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

IE7 does it too.

Safari does it as well, just not automated.

So we have the top 4 most popular browsers all supporting the same feature, and have supported it for a while, Hopefully it'll stop coming up in comparisons.

I think IE8's "new feature" is when tabs lock up (which happens all too often when you have multiple tabs open in IE7/8), after you bring out the Task Manager and kill the iexplore process, it will not close the whole browser, but just the freezing tabs closed and re-opened, which is a feature not found in other browsers. But then at times it's more annoying since those re-opened tabs locks up the browser again and again and again... :wacko:

I thought that beta 1 felt a bit heavy/sluggish on my old XP2500+ system. :pinch:

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

A misbehaving tab will lock up FF and Opera, needing a close/restart. IE8 handles tabs better: when one starts locking up, it can close/reopen the tab gracefully without having to close/reopen the entire browser.

A misbehaving tab will lock up FF and Opera, needing a close/restart. IE8 handles tabs better: when one starts locking up, it can close/reopen the tab gracefully without having to close/reopen the entire browser.

Lol, don't get me wrong, i love the ff/ie/whatever 'restore tabs' feature but doesn't it get on your ###### when it tries to 'restore' a tab which crashes the browser!

Back on topic though, does anyone have any info about how ie8 will handle css? is it fully standards compliant? does the beta render sites well seeing as i guess most sites wont have ie8 specific code yet?

/me might try it when he gets home from work

I really hope it will be possible to integrate it into a Vista or XP install. It has always been a pain in the butt to go thru all that crap with the updating and such especially when I have to reimage a box.

There's a post on the IE blog that details exactly this.

because I'll be fired if I tell me boss I'll drop support for IE6? I don't know about you, but that sounds good enough reason for me, and my living depends on it. I won't be able to find any web developing job if I tell people I don't code for IE6 :wacko:

well, there should be LESS cross-browser programming IF people stops using IE6 and IE7 the day IE8 comes out. But since many people will still use IE6 and IE7, and you can't exactly feed the same HTML to IE8 and Firefox, that means even more cross-browser programming :(

Uuummm NO, your "will make things much easier" is not relevant to what I have posted here, if you have actually read through it instead of seeing only what you wanted to see yourself.

WILL make thing easier for web devs five years in the future? maybe, that's a good possibility. However when it comes to the internet, no one can really predict what will happen five years in the future. Maybe people will all use Firefox or Opera by that time :p But it surely will make things harder for web devs NOW. web devs wants the whole browser market conforming to open standards, but currently we will more likely to get 20% IE6, 30% IE7, 20% IE8, 20% Firefox, 10% others in next year, which will be a hell for web devs :wacko:

And by web devs I mean those like myself who program for a company to make a living, who are forced to code for IE6. When you are working to code websites to feed yourself and your family everyday, you tend to think less about the ideal future a decade later, but more about what you have to code tomorrow :huh:

I said "In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers", I'm not talking about an idealized future where people all upgrade to the latest IE and IE becomes fully standards compliant. And sincerely I don't think the adoption rate of IE8 will be too high considering a lot of the IE users tend to just use whatever comes with their OS, IE6 comes with XP, IE7 comes with Vista, those IE users just aren't used to download standalone browser installs as Firefox and Opera users. So I highly doubt many IE users will download and install IE8 when it's not bundled with an OS.

I know it won't help as son as it is released, but you have to start somewhere. Would you rather they just keep using their non compliant rendering engine making things worse and worse? This is a good step.

Lol, don't get me wrong, i love the ff/ie/whatever 'restore tabs' feature but doesn't it get on your ###### when it tries to 'restore' a tab which crashes the browser!

Back on topic though, does anyone have any info about how ie8 will handle css? is it fully standards compliant? does the beta render sites well seeing as i guess most sites wont have ie8 specific code yet?

/me might try it when he gets home from work

still doesn't support XHTML, but is almost as (if not exactly as) good as the other major browsers for HTML and CSS (and JS too, I think? someone verify).

It passes the ACID 2, yay!

Apparently DOM support is better, but that might only be a few functions are improved (and more standards compliant)

Other things like Cross Site XMLHTTPRequest aren't implemented like the standard are, so that's going to require a standard way and an IE way when people use it.

I hope it can make some big stides. Firefox 3 is a pretty big hit in my household.

Ditto here. No computer in my household has IE as the default browser - it's Firefox on every PC.

Short of Microsoft sending in their Men in Black into Mozilla Headquarters and doing a 'Netscape' - Microsoft has an uphill road to climb with IE8.

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

Ditto here. No computer in my household has IE as the default browser - it's Firefox on every PC.

Short of Microsoft sending in their Men in Black into Mozilla Headquarters and doing a 'Netscape' - Microsoft has an uphill road to climb with IE8.

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

And then how do you propose that people like those who are illiterate get on the internet to get firefox, or so you assume we should put firefox on all machines rather than IE making this a fight that people will see the opposite way we see things now?

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

So you want your computer to do nothing but crash. A lot of other programs use the IE engine. :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!