Microsoft confirms IE 8 will ship this year


Recommended Posts

Care to elaborate how huge? IE 7 is enough for the mainstream users.

It's honestly massive. The jump from IE7 to IE8 completely re-writes the rendering engine. IE8 now renders things the way the specifications says they should be rendered. They're not also supporting more than they did in the past. This update is going to save web developers LOTS of time and money (assuming most people will upgrade)

It's honestly massive. The jump from IE7 to IE8 completely re-writes the rendering engine. IE8 now renders things the way the specifications says they should be rendered. They're not also supporting more than they did in the past. This update is going to save web developers LOTS of time and money (assuming most people will upgrade)

that's the sad part, there are many people who will still use IE6 after IE8 comes out. So in reality IE8 will probably lead to more work for web developers. Currently I have to check my websites to work under IE6, IE7 and Firefox (and I secretly check them under Opera too, although it's not required by my boss). After IE8 release, it will most likely be that I have to check my websites under IE6, IE7, IE8 and Firefox. And since IE8 still has its own quirks, that just means even more work to do. I'd rather just put a tag to force it to work in IE7 emulation mode. But if IE8 beta 1 is any indication, even the IE7 emulation mode is not 100% same as IE7, I already have an ajax tree builder in one of my websites not working correctly in IE8 even in IE7 emulation mode, and I still have no idea what causes the problem (albeit I'm not really trying too hard to solve the problem since it's just beta 1).

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

that's the sad part, there are many people who will still use IE6 after IE8 comes out. So in reality IE8 will probably lead to more work for web developers. Currently I have to check my websites to work under IE6, IE7 and Firefox (and I secretly check them under Opera too, although it's not required by my boss). After IE8 release, it will most likely be that I have to check my websites under IE6, IE7, IE8 and Firefox. And since IE8 still has its own quirks, that just means even more work to do. I'd rather just put a tag to force it to work in IE7 emulation mode. But if IE8 beta 1 is any indication, even the IE7 emulation mode is not 100% same as IE7, I already have an ajax tree builder in one of my websites not working correctly in IE8 even in IE7 emulation mode, and I still have no idea what causes the problem (albeit I'm not really trying too hard to solve the problem since it's just beta 1).

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

once IE8 comes out just drop support for IE6 and 7. You don't support Firefox 1 or 2, or Opera 7 or 8, so why should you support outdated IE versions? (Ok, maybe version 7 too since you might still be supporting Fx2)

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

Well given that IE8 should be much closer to a Standards-Compliant browser, there should be less cross-browser programming because provided you script your site to be HTML/XTML compliant, then it should render almost identically in all browsers. That's the entire point of W3C standards.

In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers :wacko:

Uuummm no, This is a MUCH needed change that will make things much easier for web devs. IE8's Major change is a more standards complaint rendering engine! This is what web devs have been begging ms for years and years.

once IE8 comes out just drop support for IE6 and 7. You don't support Firefox 1 or 2, or Opera 7 or 8, so why should you support outdated IE versions? (Ok, maybe version 7 too since you might still be supporting Fx2)

because I'll be fired if I tell me boss I'll drop support for IE6? I don't know about you, but that sounds good enough reason for me, and my living depends on it. I won't be able to find any web developing job if I tell people I don't code for IE6 :wacko:

Well given that IE8 should be much closer to a Standards-Compliant browser, there should be less cross-browser programming because provided you script your site to be HTML/XTML compliant, then it should render almost identically in all browsers. That's the entire point of W3C standards.

well, there should be LESS cross-browser programming IF people stops using IE6 and IE7 the day IE8 comes out. But since many people will still use IE6 and IE7, and you can't exactly feed the same HTML to IE8 and Firefox, that means even more cross-browser programming :(

Uuummm no, This is a MUCH needed change that will make things much easier for web devs. IE8's Major change is a more standards complaint rendering engine! This is what web devs have been begging ms for years and years.

Uuummm NO, your "will make things much easier" is not relevant to what I have posted here, if you have actually read through it instead of seeing only what you wanted to see yourself.

WILL make thing easier for web devs five years in the future? maybe, that's a good possibility. However when it comes to the internet, no one can really predict what will happen five years in the future. Maybe people will all use Firefox or Opera by that time :p But it surely will make things harder for web devs NOW. web devs wants the whole browser market conforming to open standards, but currently we will more likely to get 20% IE6, 30% IE7, 20% IE8, 20% Firefox, 10% others in next year, which will be a hell for web devs :wacko:

And by web devs I mean those like myself who program for a company to make a living, who are forced to code for IE6. When you are working to code websites to feed yourself and your family everyday, you tend to think less about the ideal future a decade later, but more about what you have to code tomorrow :huh:

I said "In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers", I'm not talking about an idealized future where people all upgrade to the latest IE and IE becomes fully standards compliant. And sincerely I don't think the adoption rate of IE8 will be too high considering a lot of the IE users tend to just use whatever comes with their OS, IE6 comes with XP, IE7 comes with Vista, those IE users just aren't used to download standalone browser installs as Firefox and Opera users. So I highly doubt many IE users will download and install IE8 when it's not bundled with an OS.

iirc IE8 retains a memory of all the current tabs open so that if it crashes it can reload them. That is huge for end users.

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

IE7 does it too.

Safari does it as well, just not automated.

So we have the top 4 most popular browsers all supporting the same feature, and have supported it for a while, Hopefully it'll stop coming up in comparisons.

I think IE8's "new feature" is when tabs lock up (which happens all too often when you have multiple tabs open in IE7/8), after you bring out the Task Manager and kill the iexplore process, it will not close the whole browser, but just the freezing tabs closed and re-opened, which is a feature not found in other browsers. But then at times it's more annoying since those re-opened tabs locks up the browser again and again and again... :wacko:

I thought that beta 1 felt a bit heavy/sluggish on my old XP2500+ system. :pinch:

And this is a compelling new feature for whom? Firefox and Opera have both had this feature for donkeys. :rolleyes:

A misbehaving tab will lock up FF and Opera, needing a close/restart. IE8 handles tabs better: when one starts locking up, it can close/reopen the tab gracefully without having to close/reopen the entire browser.

A misbehaving tab will lock up FF and Opera, needing a close/restart. IE8 handles tabs better: when one starts locking up, it can close/reopen the tab gracefully without having to close/reopen the entire browser.

Lol, don't get me wrong, i love the ff/ie/whatever 'restore tabs' feature but doesn't it get on your ###### when it tries to 'restore' a tab which crashes the browser!

Back on topic though, does anyone have any info about how ie8 will handle css? is it fully standards compliant? does the beta render sites well seeing as i guess most sites wont have ie8 specific code yet?

/me might try it when he gets home from work

I really hope it will be possible to integrate it into a Vista or XP install. It has always been a pain in the butt to go thru all that crap with the updating and such especially when I have to reimage a box.

There's a post on the IE blog that details exactly this.

because I'll be fired if I tell me boss I'll drop support for IE6? I don't know about you, but that sounds good enough reason for me, and my living depends on it. I won't be able to find any web developing job if I tell people I don't code for IE6 :wacko:

well, there should be LESS cross-browser programming IF people stops using IE6 and IE7 the day IE8 comes out. But since many people will still use IE6 and IE7, and you can't exactly feed the same HTML to IE8 and Firefox, that means even more cross-browser programming :(

Uuummm NO, your "will make things much easier" is not relevant to what I have posted here, if you have actually read through it instead of seeing only what you wanted to see yourself.

WILL make thing easier for web devs five years in the future? maybe, that's a good possibility. However when it comes to the internet, no one can really predict what will happen five years in the future. Maybe people will all use Firefox or Opera by that time :p But it surely will make things harder for web devs NOW. web devs wants the whole browser market conforming to open standards, but currently we will more likely to get 20% IE6, 30% IE7, 20% IE8, 20% Firefox, 10% others in next year, which will be a hell for web devs :wacko:

And by web devs I mean those like myself who program for a company to make a living, who are forced to code for IE6. When you are working to code websites to feed yourself and your family everyday, you tend to think less about the ideal future a decade later, but more about what you have to code tomorrow :huh:

I said "In the end, I think IE8 releasing this year will most likely just mean even more cross-browser programming work for us web developers", I'm not talking about an idealized future where people all upgrade to the latest IE and IE becomes fully standards compliant. And sincerely I don't think the adoption rate of IE8 will be too high considering a lot of the IE users tend to just use whatever comes with their OS, IE6 comes with XP, IE7 comes with Vista, those IE users just aren't used to download standalone browser installs as Firefox and Opera users. So I highly doubt many IE users will download and install IE8 when it's not bundled with an OS.

I know it won't help as son as it is released, but you have to start somewhere. Would you rather they just keep using their non compliant rendering engine making things worse and worse? This is a good step.

Lol, don't get me wrong, i love the ff/ie/whatever 'restore tabs' feature but doesn't it get on your ###### when it tries to 'restore' a tab which crashes the browser!

Back on topic though, does anyone have any info about how ie8 will handle css? is it fully standards compliant? does the beta render sites well seeing as i guess most sites wont have ie8 specific code yet?

/me might try it when he gets home from work

still doesn't support XHTML, but is almost as (if not exactly as) good as the other major browsers for HTML and CSS (and JS too, I think? someone verify).

It passes the ACID 2, yay!

Apparently DOM support is better, but that might only be a few functions are improved (and more standards compliant)

Other things like Cross Site XMLHTTPRequest aren't implemented like the standard are, so that's going to require a standard way and an IE way when people use it.

I hope it can make some big stides. Firefox 3 is a pretty big hit in my household.

Ditto here. No computer in my household has IE as the default browser - it's Firefox on every PC.

Short of Microsoft sending in their Men in Black into Mozilla Headquarters and doing a 'Netscape' - Microsoft has an uphill road to climb with IE8.

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

Ditto here. No computer in my household has IE as the default browser - it's Firefox on every PC.

Short of Microsoft sending in their Men in Black into Mozilla Headquarters and doing a 'Netscape' - Microsoft has an uphill road to climb with IE8.

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

And then how do you propose that people like those who are illiterate get on the internet to get firefox, or so you assume we should put firefox on all machines rather than IE making this a fight that people will see the opposite way we see things now?

It's time for the EU and US to get themselves organised and demand that Microsoft ships Windows with 'an option' to install IE or not during the Windows install process. I would like not to have Internet Explorer on my Windows PC's.

So you want your computer to do nothing but crash. A lot of other programs use the IE engine. :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!