Lost - Season 5


Recommended Posts

because she was in the past when she saw him? lol ( just like when Richard had no idea who John Locke was )

uhm, you misread what he wrote.

If Danielle saw Jin in the past, then she would have recalled his face in the future (even if she forgot his name). Facial recognition plays a large role in human communication.

Anyways, I'm going to watch past episodes with Danielle and Jin in it. I'm suspecting they never actually met, if this is true then it confirms the theory. If not, we have to wait and see until next week's episode.

Perhaps, there will be another time jump 2 months after Danielle's group crashed on the Island. This is when she starts killing off her team because of paranoia that they are infected by "the Others". So, this might play a role in her amnesia in the future IF she did meet Jin in Season 1 to 4.

Edited by NeptuneSaK
uhm, you misread what he wrote.

If Danielle saw Jin in the past, then she would have recalled his face in the future (even if she forgot his name). Facial recognition plays a large role in human communication.

but.. Rousseau first met him when she was way older? So why would she remember him

when she was only like 20 and still pregnant with Alex?

sorry if I'm missing something here. :x

but.. Rousseau first met him when she was way older? So why would she remember him

when she was only like 20 and still pregnant with Alex?

sorry if I'm missing something here. :x

No, timeline-wise she first met him when she was first getting to the island and still pregnant.

Then she runs into him again after 815 crashes.

There also may be times in between when they come across each other that we haven't seen yet.

but.. Rousseau first met him when she was way older? So why would she remember him

when she was only like 20 and still pregnant with Alex?

Let's assume for argument sake - Jin and Danielle met in 2004, after the 815 crash.

Time warp happens now: Why 1987? Because Danielle crashed on the Island 16 years before 815 crashed on the Island.

- Jin is living in his present in Danielle's past (which is really Danielle's present). I'm using Jin as frame of reference

- They meet in 1987 (tonight's episode), so Danielle now has memories of Jin from 1987

- 16 years later, she should still have memories of meeting Jin in 1987

- 2004, Jin and Danielle meet and have sexy time.

clearer?

No, timeline-wise she first met him when she was first getting to the island and still pregnant.

Then she runs into him again after 815 crashes.

There also may be times in between when they come across each other that we haven't seen yet.

ah, that finally got through my thick skull!

thanks for clearing that up for me episode and neptune. :D

I guess the Miles = Candle/Wickmund/Halliwax's son theory was correct.

Bwhahaha ;)

Great episode. I had a feeling Ben was behind Kate's trouble as a means of getting the O6 back together; you can't put something that devious past him.

Now Juliet's nose is bleeding. Crazy.

I'm really bugged about Jin being alive. A few minutes after the explosion, the island moved, and the helicopter was much closer than the boat was. I watched the scene where he "died", the outside of the flame was right where we last saw him, and the explosion itself would've sent him flying and likely caused serious damage. We can't expect to believe that he decided to jump off and swim towards the island, I mean, Sun was screaming for him, looking at him, up until it blew up, so she would've seen that or something. I liked his character and seeing him "die" was definitely a sad moment, but I was ready to let go, and now he's back (I recall saying the same thing about Nathan in Heroes). I'm hoping the writers have some kind of ace up their sleeve, because if he was in the radius like the zodiac, then surely the helicopter would have been. On the flip side, there could be an argument that the radius wasn't so much of a full circle all around the island, but more outwards into the ocean. I'm a bit pessimistic about this route, but by no means will it kill the show for me.

Another item, very minor, was the beam of light. No way the light from the hatch made that beam. It's an element for the sake of the plot, but not major. http://youtube.com/watch?v=-N7KOGnATgM

Edited by Mathachew
- 2004, Jin and Danielle meet and have sexy time.

clearer?

did that really happen?

what would happen if the island went to a time where juliet or charlotte were on the island but the others (and by others I mean the castaways, swayer, etc) were not? are there two juliets there at the same time or would juliet dissapear because there's already one juliet at that time? like with richard, should we assume that in 1954 or whenever it was, there was that one richard and another time-shifter richard?

The reason I asked that question is because... now we know that there can be two 'instances' of the same person at the same time lol. Like, "present" locke, juliet, swayer, etc.. went back to the time where claire gave birth, so there were two of them on the island.

MY question is, are ALL the others inhabitants of the island also travelling through time? When richard gave locke the compass, he dissapeared with the next flash, right? That means that that richard belonged to that time, and it was not "present-supposedly-time-travelling richard". Do we know 'when' richard gave the compass to locke? Was it the future? I guess it will all be explained when locke tells richard that we has wounded. But for all we know, that one richard was not moving through time.

that was an awesome episode. So is that danielle the same one thats with locke now?

Nope it would be this Danielle

250px-Danielle_Rousseau.PNG

Good episode (Y)

I totally saw that bit happening at the end tho, but the French people looked modern.

@mrchuang who knows, natives maybe?

5.05 Promo

Wasn't Ben the father of Danielle's daghter (Alex)? The fact that Danielle is already pregnant when she crashed into the island doesn't make sense. Unless Ben isn't the real father or something.

Ben isn't the father, he just assumed duties when they stole the baby in one of their nightly raids, remember the others did that to the losties they stole the children at night.

Ok say the people on the canoe were natives, why were the natives in the time zone where the camp has been deserted, because remember when they were looking for the zodiac and they saw canoes on the beach next to the camp which was deserted? Pretty good episode, it started slow and then picked up towards the end. Promo for next week looks great, and in episode 6 I just noticed in the cast list it has Fionnula Flanagan as Eloise Hawking, guess I am slow at noticing this.

Does this have anything to do with that flashback last season where Jin really wanted to get that stuffed panda and also at the same time (presumably) Sun was in labour? And it turned out that Jin was actually going to give the panda to his boss's newborn. I wonder maybe Sun hasn't realised that Jin wasn't actually alive and stuff.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!