Lost - Season 5


Recommended Posts

You are wrong. Deal with it.

Quit trolling. It's my opinion, there is no right or wrong. Until its officially confirmed, DEAL WITH IT.

Lostpedia states, "While at the store, she briefly loses Aaron and finds him walking with a woman, who from behind looks like Claire. Kate is reunited with Aaron at the store, and goes to visit Cassidy again."

Right. Lostpedia. :rolleyes:

Why can't you accept that the writers did this to make us think it was Claire for just a moment.

Think here for a second instead of defending your little theory just because you want an argument.

Why would the writers go back on the previous scene where Claire comes to Kate and tells her not to bring Aaron to the Island. What is the significance of Claire going off Island to take Aaron? It's not my fault you were fooled into believing it was Claire so easily for that moment of time.

That was the reason Kate had that look on her face. She realized he isn't her son and that it was time to start telling the truth. That scene is the pivotal moment that makes her realize she needed to go back to the island.

Agreed. But the state of confusion or clarity on Kate's face was because she knew it was a kidnapper. Not because she thought it was Claire.

The writers picked a character who looked similar to Claire, because this is what played on the emotions of Kate who after this event decides to go back to the Island "to get Claire", knowing that she can't be Aarons mum forever.

The fact the actor looked similar to Claire was more significant to Kate than it was to the viewer, I personally didn't have bells ringing when I saw the scene (about it being Claire), but can see in retrospect why that particular actor was chosen.

Why would the writers go back on the previous scene where Claire comes to Kate and tells her not to bring Aaron to the Island. What is the significance of Claire going off Island to take Aaron? It's not my fault you were fooled into believing it was Claire so easily for that moment of time.

Agreed. But the state of confusion or clarity on Kate's face was because she knew it was a kidnapper. Not because she thought it was Claire.

NO ONE SAID IT WAS CLAIRE!!! Damn. What is your problem?

That was the point at all. The point is the writers wrote that scene in there to make Kate and the audience to think it was Claire so we could understand why she decided to go back. It is the only explanation as to why she decided to go back. It is solely because she thought it was Claire at first, not because it was a kidnapper. If she had only thought it was a kidnapper she wouldn't have said thank you, but she realized the island was sending her a message, that she needed to go back.

NO ONE SAID IT WAS CLAIRE!!! Damn. What is your problem?

Easy there tough guy. No need to get upset over differences of opinion on a forum.

That was the point at all. The point is the writers wrote that scene in there to make Kate and the audience to think it was Claire so we could understand why she decided to go back. It is the only explanation as to why she decided to go back.

Kate: I lost him.

Cassidy: What?

Kate: I don't know what happened, we were in the supermarket and I turned around for one second and he was gone.

[Kate teary eyes]

Kate: I mean, the crazy thing is, as scared as I was, I wasn't surprised.

Kate: All I can think was, it was about time.

Kate: Why would I feel this way, why would I expect him to be taken?

She decided to go back after the conversation with Cassidy due that scene in the supermarket.

It is solely because she thought it was Claire at first, not because it was a kidnapper. If she had only thought it was a kidnapper she wouldn't have said thank you, but she realized the island was sending her a message, that she needed to go back.

No, her eyes were fixed on Aaron as she called out for Aaron. She didn't say Claire out loud, she said Aaron. And so, the kidnapper turned around...

Easy there tough guy. No need to get upset over differences of opinion on a forum.

Kate: I lost him.

Cassidy: What?

Kate: I don't know what happened, we were in the supermarket and I turned around for one second and he was gone.

[Kate teary eyes]

Kate: I mean, the crazy thing is, as scared as I was, I wasn't surprised.

Kate: All I can think was, it was about time.

Kate: Why would I feel this way, why would I expect him to be taken?

She decided to go back after the conversation with Cassidy due that scene in the supermarket.

No, her eyes were fixed on Aaron as she called out for Aaron. She didn't say Claire out loud, she said Aaron. And so, the kidnapper turned around...

:no: It doesn't matter what she said, what matters is what happened, what we saw. We were suppose to see Claire and I'm sorry that you didn't, but that doesn't change the fact the we were meant to think it was Claire. I've taken enough writing courses to know the tricks writers/directors use and this is clearly one of them.

She obviously doesn't tell Cassidy everything, so it is safe to assume she didn't tell her about the big smoke monster, or hearing voices in the jungle, etc. If she admitted she thought she saw Claire then Cassidy might think she's crazy and losing it.

Why else would she run to Claire's mom to give Aaron up? Because she thought she saw Claire and it triggered something. I really don't get why this is so hard to accept?

:no: It doesn't matter what she said,

Yep, let's completely ignore what Kate got out of it and insert your own theory to justify what happened.

what matters is what happened, what we saw. We were suppose to see Claire and I'm sorry that you didn't, but that doesn't change the fact the we were meant to think it was Claire. I've taken enough writing courses to know the tricks writers/directors use and this is clearly one of them.

Oh, wow. You took courses... you KNOW everything that's happening on LOST. Damn, I feel so stupid now arguing with a LOST-writer.

Why else would she run to Claire's mom to give Aaron up? Because she thought she saw Claire and it triggered something. I really don't get why this is so hard to accept?

Either that or it was finally apparent that Aaron being taken away was a relief for her. Which was the case in the discussion between Kate and Cassidy. Latter seems more likely because it was the explanation given by the writers, not that she "thought" she saw Claire in the supermarket.

Anyway, this is a non-issue. You can continue to stroke your penis if you wish.

WHAT'S TO COME:

Brinn in Santa Barbara, Calif.: So, I am in no way asking you to reveal the Lost death to me, but would you possibly be able to confirm that it is not Penny? I am suddenly freaking out that TPTB might kill off one half of my favorite TV couples ever. Hopefully you can help ease my unease. Wait, if you can't confirm that it isn't her then it might be ruined for me. Ahh, what a pickle I'm in! I guess you should just proceed at your own discretion.

It's not Penny.

Video Podcast

I for one, believe that the character was chosen deliberately to look like Claire. The producers choose their actors carefully. In this case, it was to imply, even for a brief second "Is that Claire". Still, I am not convinced her intentions were to take Aaron, since she was in no rush to get out and she had a basket of groceries. But those are moot points.

It was clearly meant to look to the viewer and Kate like it was Claire taking Aaron.

I don't know how you could think otherwise.

According to Miles' time theory, when the Losties first crashed on the island, shouldn't Richard remember them? Also in this season when Sawyer talked to Richard in the 70s, shouldn't Richard remember him from when the island had those flashes and John met Richard?

Sawyer didn't go to the camp in 1954.

According to Miles' time theory, when the Losties first crashed on the island, shouldn't Richard remember them? Also in this season when Sawyer talked to Richard in the 70s, shouldn't Richard remember him from when the island had those flashes and John met Richard?

Richard can't remember anything that hasn't happened yet in his timeline.

According to Miles' time theory, when the Losties first crashed on the island, shouldn't Richard remember them?

Yeah, he would be the only one on the Island who knows what happens on a linear timeline. So, Richard knew about John, Daniel, Charlotte, Miles, Juliet, and Sawyer in post 815 crash.

Also in this season when Sawyer talked to Richard in the 70s, shouldn't Richard remember him from when the island had those flashes and John met Richard?

Richard never actually met Sawyer from what we saw in that episode. But Sawyer was at the 1954 camp right when it disappeared. It's possible, Ellie told Richard about Sawyer and Juliet, but I don't think she knew their names.

Sawyer didn't go to the camp in 1954.

He did at the end when Ellie, Daniel and Juliet came back from Jughead.

I do have to ask a question though that just hit me. Why does a janitor have a key to a jail cell? What use would he have for it? If he needed to clean up in there, would a security officer be there with him making him needing a key useless.

I was thinking that, he's not a security guard so there would be no reason for him to have those keys.

but Richard never saw Sawyer or Juliet... Duh!

I already mentioned that, what is your point?

Richard never actually met Sawyer from what we saw in that episode. But Sawyer was at the 1954 camp right when it disappeared. It's possible, Ellie told Richard about Sawyer and Juliet, but I don't think she knew their names.

I loved this episode. Loved the scenes involving Hurley and Miles. That's what I have always wanted to see - characters reacting like normal people to the situation, debating the same things we are debating.

The new sawyer is also interesting. I am also thankfull to the writers for finally resolving the love quadrangle (hopefully).

And I actually agree with Hurley. I am one of those who thinks that the writers are just misleading us things can be changed. May be the incident will give us the answer.

And man wtf wtf wtf @ next weeks promo

Even with the extra time for ads, each episode is around the same amount as any other hour long drama.

Episode of Heroes - 41 minutes

Episode of Lost - 42 minutes

So we're getting the same amount of show. I don't see any reason to complain, ABC has to pay for the show some how and with the decrease in viewership compared to the first couple of seasons, ABC had to add in more ad time (and only by 2 minutes) to make up the money.

Episode 5.12 - Dead Is Dead - UK Press Release

In order to atone for the awful sins of his past, Ben attempts to summon the Smoke Monster ready to be judged.

As he seeks redemption, we learn more about Ben's terrible actions and meet some faces from the past. His relationship with 'daughter' Alex is revealed, as is the story of how he came to steal her from Danielle.

But what is the truth behind the enmity between Ben and Charles Widmore ? and did he make good on his vow to avenge Alex's death?

--

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!