Stargate Universe (Season 1)


Poll added by Fred Derf on April 10th  

157 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should lead on Destiny?



Recommended Posts

You guys gotta remember that they had already finished filming every episode of the 1st season before they even aired a single episode. So the writers and producers couldn't take fan comments and backlash into consideration for the 1st season really at all. The 2nd season should be much better imo since they already know what people don't want to see anymore on a Stargate show (sex scenes) and what they want to see more of (aliens etc) and all that good stuff.

I suppose you're right. We'll see how it goes.

You guys gotta remember that they had already finished filming every episode of the 1st season before they even aired a single episode. So the writers and producers couldn't take fan comments and backlash into consideration for the 1st season really at all. The 2nd season should be much better imo since they already know what people don't want to see anymore on a Stargate show (sex scenes) and what they want to see more of (aliens etc) and all that good stuff.

Plus, the back half of the 1st season is supposedly much better anyways, and has more action etc :)

Oh, I definitely didn't know that. I guess I can look forward to season 2 then. Not that this season is good, or bad for that matter. I find it decent and enjoyable.

I am a big BSG fan, have the full DVD collection, the full Blu-ray Collection...some figures and all that. Universe is nothing like BSG. I think Universe is on par with the other Stargate shows, which is my number 2 shows. Yes there needs to be some work done, and get some more story's going, but it's still awesome.

If you can't see the similarities then maybe you need your eye sight checked? Where to begin? moody characters, dark sets, slow moving, drama, soapy, fast camera panning, zooming in and out of scenes and peoples faces.

The only things universe has in common with stargate is the fact it has a gate and that they are on an ancient ship. (which happens to look like a c*ck.)

btw I'm not a fanboy, I just don't like it when a spin off tries to emulate another show that is not part of the series and seems to forget it's roots. I can handle spin offs from shows like star trek, csi, family guy, ncis as they tried to keep to the same format of the previous shows. Enterprise had more in common with star trek than universe has in common with stargate, and it wasn't a complete letdown from the pilot onwards. The writers managed to kee the drama elements to minimal amounts and didn't overuse them. There was decent story in each episode and all the characters were likeable.

The cast of universe look they have to strain all the time to force out some dialog and the leader greer or whatever his name is always looks like he's going to take a dump or cry. Eli has bad jokes, the women are just there for the eye candy and the tough looking ones will probably get killed off sometime or do something heroic in a cheesy way. Dr.Rush will most likely figure everything out suddenly and save the day.

I really hope they lay of using the communication stones as they serve no purpose other than to see family back home and bore us with some dull scenes, still sg-1 is to blame for introducing those darn things. This probably sounds like a rant but it's how I feel about the show. I hate it when good shows spawn bad spin offs with no characters than can relate to previous series characters in any way. They even have crappy uniforms, not much effort there in the design department.

btw I'm not a fanboy, I just don't like it when a spin off tries to emulate another show that is not part of the series and seems to forget it's roots. I can handle spin offs from shows like star trek, csi, family guy, ncis as they tried to keep to the same format of the previous shows. Enterprise had more in common with star trek than universe has in common with stargate, and it wasn't a complete letdown from the pilot onwards. The writers managed to kee the drama elements to minimal amounts and didn't overuse them. There was decent story in each episode and all the characters were likeable.

The cast of universe look they have to strain all the time to force out some dialog and the leader greer or whatever his name is always looks like he's going to take a dump or cry. Eli has bad jokes, the women are just there for the eye candy and the tough looking ones will probably get killed off sometime or do something heroic in a cheesy way. Dr.Rush will most likely figure everything out suddenly and save the day.

I really hope they lay of using the communication stones as they serve no purpose other than to see family back home and bore us with some dull scenes, still sg-1 is to blame for introducing those darn things. This probably sounds like a rant but it's how I feel about the show. I hate it when good shows spawn bad spin offs with no characters than can relate to previous series characters in any way. They even have crappy uniforms, not much effort there in the design department.

And I thought I got into detail about shows and movies with my friends. I will believe your last post (needing my eyes checked) if you answer one question, did you watch BSG or do you just think you know what it is. Maybe your right, but I don't see it. Maybe a few similarities in camera work, but even the feel of the look and all that is not the same. I have watched every stargate movie and show, and all BSG stuff. I just don't see it, i do agree this stargate is nothing like the rest of the stargates.

And I thought I got into detail about shows and movies with my friends. I will believe your last post (needing my eyes checked) if you answer one question, did you watch BSG or do you just think you know what it is. Maybe your right, but I don't see it. Maybe a few similarities in camera work, but even the feel of the look and all that is not the same. I have watched every stargate movie and show, and all BSG stuff. I just don't see it, i do agree this stargate is nothing like the rest of the stargates.

Yup, I've seen various episodes of BSG, I could never get into it though, that's why I'm finding it hard to get into SGU, the two shows are quite similar. I don't like the wobbling camera angles, zooming, over use of drama & whinning characters, hearing the same blah blah at the beginning of each episode, no proper intro, outtro music isn't very epic. These kinds of things I noticed in BSG too. It's like they are trying way too hard to make it exciting with the background music dun dun dun dun, but that's just masking the fact there is no tension....

Yup, I've seen various episodes of BSG, I could never get into it though, that's why I'm finding it hard to get into SGU, the two shows are quite similar. I don't like the wobbling camera angles, zooming, over use of drama & whinning characters, hearing the same blah blah at the beginning of each episode, no proper intro, outtro music isn't very epic. These kinds of things I noticed in BSG too. It's like they are trying way too hard to make it exciting with the background music dun dun dun dun, but that's just masking the fact there is no tension....

I can agree on the intro information. Both do that, but if you watch BSG from start to finish. The intro kinda works, cause it recaps, but then also shows whats going to happen this episode, but in a discrete way. Does not work for SGU

I used to hate it when BSG used to show what was coming up in the episode...used to skip at least the first minute on the dvd.

Really? I always found it genius. It showed you, but you still didn't really know what was going to happen. Got you ready for it, excited.

  • 2 weeks later...

Spoiler Casting Call!

[sIMEON] (GUEST LEAD) - 35-45..

Simeon is a dangerous Lucian Alliance soldier. He was a seasoned criminal before being recruited by the Alliance. He's strong and intimidating but more crafty and wiry than big and muscular. Scary in that you're never sure what he will do. He also holds secrets that are desperately sought after by Earth and those on board Destiny -- secrets he would die or worse, kill to protect. He's an antagonist for several episodes before he finally comes into serious conflict with Robert Carlyle's character Rush and they are forced to face off. RECURRING. This role will work 6-7 episodes (Please submit all ethnicities)

Source: SpoilerTV

  • 3 weeks later...

Stargate Universe executive producer Joseph Mallozzi's (formally consulting producer for season 1) has revealed on his Weblog the first 5 episode titles for season 2.

?2.01 ?Intervention? (written by Paul Mullie, to be directed by Andy Mikita)

?2.02 ?Aftermath? (written by Robert C. Cooper)

?2.03 ?Awakenings? (written by Joseph Mallozzi)

?2.04 "Pathogen" (written by Carl Binder)

?2.05 "Cloverdale" (written by Brad Wright)

Source: Joseph Mallozzi's Weblog

Season 1 continues April 2nd on Syfy.

Syfy have announced their April schedule for Stargate Universe, with 5 new episodes.

?Space? - April 2

?Divided? ? April 9

?Faith? ? April 16

?Human? ? April 23

?Sabotage? ? April 30

Sky1 in the U.K, will also begin airing new episodes in April.

Syfy

about time... what about V (Visitor) ?

Syfy have announced their April schedule for Stargate Universe, with 5 new episodes.

?Space? - April 2

?Divided? ? April 9

?Faith? ? April 16

?Human? ? April 23

?Sabotage? ? April 30

Sky1 in the U.K, will also begin airing new episodes in April.

Syfy

It's not a bad show, but it can't compare to its predecessors at all. I'm still mad Atlantis got canceled with so many loose ends. Huge bonehead move.

Wish that professor dude was dead though. Hate that guy.

There's a professor in stargate universe? :blink:

Actor Robert Carlyle ? SGU?s own Dr. Nicholas Rush ? will step behind the camera and make his directorial debut in an upcoming episode of Stargate Universe.

Carlyle is currently directing ?Pathogen,? written by Carl Binder, co-star Ming-Na (?Camille Wray?) confirmed via Twitter.

The episode will air fourth when Season Two premieres this fall, but it is the first to film.

GateWorld

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!