UEFA Champions League


UEFA CL 2008/2009  

105 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win UEFA CL 2008/2009?

    • Arsenal
      12
    • Liverpool
      10
    • Barcelona
      31
    • Inter
      2
    • Manchester United
      30
    • Chelsea
      6
    • Real Madrid
      4
    • Other
      10
  2. 2. Top Scorer?

    • Kaka
      1
    • Henry
      5
    • Eto'o
      13
    • Ronaldinho
      2
    • Fernando Torres
      16
    • Ronaldo
      21
    • Other
      47


Recommended Posts

Well, kinda harsh on Chelesa but when you setup to play defensively, that is the price you pay against a side as good as Barcelona. Personally I thought there was a chance they might pay for their approach to the first leg, and although it could be argued they where a little bit hard done by tonight, personally I feel they payed for playing defensively over the course of the 2 legs.

Bit disappointed because I don't really want united to win the CL, but with half of Barcelona's already shaky defense suspended or injured its gonna be a tough ask for Barcelona to beat united in the final.

Also :rolleyes: at Drogba again, the guy is just proving what a disgrace to the game he is. Bout time IMO that Uefa did something about his behaviour.

Daaaamn I missed all the drama, stop watching the game at about 70 mins.

Also I wanted a Man Utd Chelsea rematch :( Guess Barcelona will liven things up a bit from it just feeling like a premier league match :laugh: I think they actually might win it though, even with their defensive worries.

Reffing in both semi-finals was really bad. The only refereeing display I saw which really impressed me this season was the referee in the United VS Liverpool game. Uefa need to take a long hard look at the quality of their reffing, and again I may state...

BRING VIDEO REPLAYS INTO THE DAMN GAME!

Throughout the entire match I was wondering why no quick passes followed by powerful shots from Barcelona, when it evident it was needed so much... one time they did, it went in, was it that hard?

Chelsea were much better this time, I think they could afford playing like that in the first leg, but after that display I just don't care what happened this game, I didn't want Chelsea to get anything.

Barcelona didn't do the right things in this game, Alves was horrible and why does he get to kick all the free balls? I don't know, Barca will need to be more focuses against Manchester United but United is a whole new style of play, so I expect things to be different, hope for a good game.

Maybe the ref had a vendetta against chelsea, I dont know but this is how the game goes. Teams have been unlucky in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

No place for vid replays in football leave that to cricket please.

reffing sucks hard..

Chelsea deserved to win.. But i was with Barca..

u wouldnt believe i was *like so disappointed at how bad they were playing.

I really think Iniesta and Messi should be playing for some other team. They are 2 big players for Barca.

They were making all the chances. And they were the one because of whom Barca goes to the final.

I wanted a Barca Man U final :p and ill get one :D :D :D

P.S.

About the Reffing. They should Allow a referee outside who atleast judge the penalty calls.. The Blind BALDY MAN gave unfair Red card ... misjudged 4 penalty fouls.. and more.. I remember there was an Italian refferee... skinny.. old..

i really liked him.. he was fair.

reffing sucks hard..

Chelsea deserved to win.. But i was with Barca..

u wouldnt believe i was *like so disappointed at how bad they were playing.

I really think Iniesta and Messi should be playing for some other team. They are 2 big players for Barca.

They were making all the chances. And they were the one because of whom Barca goes to the final.

I wanted a Barca Man U final :p and ill get one :D :D :D

P.S.

About the Reffing. They should Allow a referee outside who atleast judge the penalty calls.. The Blind BALDY MAN gave unfair Red card ... misjudged 4 penalty fouls.. and more.. I remember there was an Italian refferee... skinny.. old..

i really liked him.. he was fair.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierluigi_Collina

He is a legend.

Man Utds biggest problem IMO is Barcelona's pace.

The back four of Man Utd aside from Evra aren't the fastest bunch, so I think Sir Alex would be relying on the midfield to do what they usually do and put a lot of pressure on opposition attacks. Shame fletcher isn't in there though, he works his ass off.

Due to how attacking Man Utd usually play, exposing a slow back 4 is much easier than the likes of Chelsea who park the bus quite a bit at times.

Maybe the ref had a vendetta against chelsea

I believe it was Abidal who got sent off wrongly.. and he is not a Chelsea player.. hats off to Barca for coming back with 10 men..

Drogba was awful.. Ballack disgraceful..

I wanted an all English final game.. but glad Barca won it coz final will be very interesting now.. if Chelsea had won.. final would've been boring and defensive.. with these 2 in the final i expect fireworks.. I hope now for Henry's sake that Barca wins.. as an ex-Gunner we still love him and he deserves this trophy more than anyone..

PS.. I almost forgot.. did Terry cry again??? Anyone saw this or vice versa? I was too busy dancing with joy to look at the telly after they scored.. :blush:

Edited by Kralik
+1

The argument against not bringing in replays in football is really stupid IMO.. they say it will affect the flow of the game.. like the match is never stopped for freekicks or conslting the linesman!

The clock doesn't stop. If you consult replays then there's going to be a lot of added time.

The clock doesn't stop. If you consult replays then there's going to be a lot of added time.

Maybe. It depends how they handle it. In Rugby (both League and Union), it usually takes around a minute, but they stop the clock. The main argument I read is that at grass roots, it wouldn't be available, so the game would be inconsistent.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!