AMD Phenom FX-80 {4.0Ghz} and FX-82 {4.4Ghz}


Recommended Posts

So how does the Phenom compare to current Core 2 Quads?

clock for clock, they should be about the same. So if AMD really can crank the Deneb clock to over 4GHz, that means they are back to game, which is a good thing.

Of course Intel will have Nehalem, and hopefully AMD will again bring the price down, that means cheaper Nehalem too ;)

I bet they will be too expensive to matter though even if they are real. :(

But it also means that there will be better overclocking potential for the lower-range Deneb's, bringing them to at least equal grounds to Penryn C2Q's.

AMD is back baby! 4.0GHz processors, Intel will be blown out of the water for a couple of quarters.

well, with Penryn C2Q's already overclocking to 4GHz easily, I doubt they'll be blown out of the water. But if AMD can continue its aggressive pricings with Deneb's (without going bankrupt that is), it will surely be a great news for us consumers :)

AMD is back baby! 4.0GHz processors, Intel will be blown out of the water for a couple of quarters.

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

Can't beat them for price though X2 cheap as chips and still powerful compared to intel. For price of Core 2 quad Q9300 or Q6600 locally i got a 5600+ 2.8GHz dual core + 3870 graphics card for less then the intel cpu alone. most people are paying premium for "power" which probably generally speaking goes unused or isn't needed

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

Are you saying the Athlon X2 processors are a joke? When they came out they ****ing wiped the floor with intel's Pentium D. And AMD's processors are still competitive in the low-mid end, you can get a X2 5000+ (Black edition) for 59 dollars, show me an intel at that price that will outperform that. Intel does currently have the performance crown, but not all of AMD's processors are "bad" or a "joke"

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

.. you're the failure by excellence mate.

Last time I checked intel was putting a memory controller inside their silicon. Read up where that comes from.

..

Atom? Read up on Athlon64 2000+ for power consumption.

..

Performance per watt? Ask most corporate environments.

..

AMD could be out of the gaming scene (for a while at least) but thats not where the money comes from.

..

oh, and buying ATI was probably the best thing they could have done. Especially now that's where most of their revenue comes from.

..

Spider a joke?? At least I can pronounce the word. Try with ViiV. Same type of joke.

I'm running a CROSSBONE X2 @ 2.1Ghz and it can handle everything I throw it, Adobe Master Collection CS3, Office 2K7, Visual Studio 2008 all on Vista Ultimate SP1.

for $59 I was very impressed, and this thing is so quiet!

I'm waiting to get a 8600GT so I can do some gaming. I use my 360 for the most graphically intense games out there.

I wouldn't call the X2 platform a joke.. at all.

I think marketing departments just lead you to believe you need some kind of extreme edition chip to run any software you through at it. In reality, the higher end chips only show their worth in a few applications..many of which normal desktop users will not use. Normal "budget" chips will run anything.

Also, slight pet peeve..but the fan is quiet. Processors don't really make noise..

I think marketing departments just lead you to believe you need some kind of extreme edition chip to run any software you through at it. In reality, the higher end chips only show their worth in a few applications..many of which normal desktop users will not use. Normal "budget" chips will run anything.

Also, slight pet peeve..but the fan is quiet. Processors don't really make noise..

You should've heard my Dad's P4 Northwood. That thing is like a jet when it boots and the gpu didn't even have any fans.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!