AMD Phenom FX-80 {4.0Ghz} and FX-82 {4.4Ghz}


Recommended Posts

So how does the Phenom compare to current Core 2 Quads?

clock for clock, they should be about the same. So if AMD really can crank the Deneb clock to over 4GHz, that means they are back to game, which is a good thing.

Of course Intel will have Nehalem, and hopefully AMD will again bring the price down, that means cheaper Nehalem too ;)

I bet they will be too expensive to matter though even if they are real. :(

But it also means that there will be better overclocking potential for the lower-range Deneb's, bringing them to at least equal grounds to Penryn C2Q's.

AMD is back baby! 4.0GHz processors, Intel will be blown out of the water for a couple of quarters.

well, with Penryn C2Q's already overclocking to 4GHz easily, I doubt they'll be blown out of the water. But if AMD can continue its aggressive pricings with Deneb's (without going bankrupt that is), it will surely be a great news for us consumers :)

AMD is back baby! 4.0GHz processors, Intel will be blown out of the water for a couple of quarters.

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

Can't beat them for price though X2 cheap as chips and still powerful compared to intel. For price of Core 2 quad Q9300 or Q6600 locally i got a 5600+ 2.8GHz dual core + 3870 graphics card for less then the intel cpu alone. most people are paying premium for "power" which probably generally speaking goes unused or isn't needed

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

Are you saying the Athlon X2 processors are a joke? When they came out they ****ing wiped the floor with intel's Pentium D. And AMD's processors are still competitive in the low-mid end, you can get a X2 5000+ (Black edition) for 59 dollars, show me an intel at that price that will outperform that. Intel does currently have the performance crown, but not all of AMD's processors are "bad" or a "joke"

youre joking, right ?

well of course you are

nobody would really think something like that

I mean my cocker spaniel even knows the 4870 was just a blip in a sea of problems...

the fact they are going back to higher clocks is because they have already failed at creating any decent architecture...

I think its a last ditch error I mean the Board of Directors are about to clean house, the company isnt worth as much as it paid for ATi, they are losing more and more ground to intel by playing catch-up.... they're screwed.

Phenom - joke

4x4 - joke

Spyder platform - joke

x2 dual core platform - joke

most experts say Nehalem will simply be the nail in the coffin

and intel without any competition in the microprocessor field isnt a good thing for consumers

it kinda takes the teeth out of the animal

.. you're the failure by excellence mate.

Last time I checked intel was putting a memory controller inside their silicon. Read up where that comes from.

..

Atom? Read up on Athlon64 2000+ for power consumption.

..

Performance per watt? Ask most corporate environments.

..

AMD could be out of the gaming scene (for a while at least) but thats not where the money comes from.

..

oh, and buying ATI was probably the best thing they could have done. Especially now that's where most of their revenue comes from.

..

Spider a joke?? At least I can pronounce the word. Try with ViiV. Same type of joke.

I'm running a CROSSBONE X2 @ 2.1Ghz and it can handle everything I throw it, Adobe Master Collection CS3, Office 2K7, Visual Studio 2008 all on Vista Ultimate SP1.

for $59 I was very impressed, and this thing is so quiet!

I'm waiting to get a 8600GT so I can do some gaming. I use my 360 for the most graphically intense games out there.

I wouldn't call the X2 platform a joke.. at all.

I think marketing departments just lead you to believe you need some kind of extreme edition chip to run any software you through at it. In reality, the higher end chips only show their worth in a few applications..many of which normal desktop users will not use. Normal "budget" chips will run anything.

Also, slight pet peeve..but the fan is quiet. Processors don't really make noise..

I think marketing departments just lead you to believe you need some kind of extreme edition chip to run any software you through at it. In reality, the higher end chips only show their worth in a few applications..many of which normal desktop users will not use. Normal "budget" chips will run anything.

Also, slight pet peeve..but the fan is quiet. Processors don't really make noise..

You should've heard my Dad's P4 Northwood. That thing is like a jet when it boots and the gpu didn't even have any fans.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!