[Non-US] Who do you want to win the US elections


  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. You choose

    • Obama
      141
    • McCain
      28
    • Neither
      20
    • Arnold Swarchenegger or another celeb (If it were possible)
      14


Recommended Posts

Obama scares the hell out of me.... The way he just came out of nowhere and swept the country (and the world?) by storm.... they way he has millions of followers thinking he's gods gift to the world's problems... this dude reeks of "anti-christ"........

Needless to say, *I* am not voting for him.

you are joking, right?

I mean, there is just no way someone really believes this.

it'd be a good idea to give voters a test, just so we are sure there aren't individuals who vote for s*** reasons.

Edited by brayan27
PS- why should this be a non-us question? He's running for prez in MY country.... why should my opinion not matter?

It's not that it doesn't matter. It's just that the subject of this thread is to know what people from other countries feel about it.

I picked Obama in the poll. Like mentioned before, it's because I think McCain is just Bush, part III.

Who owns them? Does he just rent seven houses?

I see in the overwhelming news about McCain not knowing how many homes he owns, you didn't hear that he actually owns none of them, and many news agencies can't even get the number right for who does.

you are joking, right?

I mean, there is just no way someone really believes this.

it'd be a good idea to give voters a test, just so we are sure there aren't individuals who vote for s*** reasons.

Yeah, just further proofs how dumb US religious people are.... anti-christ.. lol

world power, ha.

Let me take a wild guess that Obama is winning this pole. Whatever, I hope Obama wins so that he can see how hard a job it really is when fuel prices continue to rise which will in turn continue to keep the world economy down. Although I'm sure when Obama suggests more drilling and the building of pipelines once he's president because that's when people want results and not just mindless talk we won't be hearing about how he's trying to destroy the environment. Of course if a Republician tried to do the exact same thing he would be lampooned by the media. I mean Democrats won congress 2 year ago and they have a lower approval rating then Bush but Republicans are evil and Democrats can do no wrong in the eyes of the media. Ron Paul would be the best candidate in my opinion.

Obama for me.

Oh and has it been mentioned before that it's "Schwarzenegger" and not "Swarchenegger"?^^

Glassed Silver:mac

Obama for me.

Oh and has it been mentioned before that it's "Schwarzenegger" and not "Swarchenegger"?^^

Glassed Silver:mac

How do you know I didn't actually mean Mr Swarchenegger??? :p

Anyway...

Opps :blush: Im blaming google for that.

How do you know I didn't actually mean Mr Swarchenegger??? :p

Anyway...

Opps :blush: Im blaming google for that.

No one would ever possibly vote for Swarchenegger, because we all know he's a prick! :p

Glassed Silver:mac

Obama: "Eight is Enough"

Personally, I think Obama would be the best for us (Canada) to work with. We all know Bush did SFA for Canada-US relations, and I can't see McCain doing much more.

They might apply Palin's experience to Canada. You know, Alaska is beside Canada, so he must have extensive experience with Canada. :rolleyes:

I never understood the fear of a candidate coming out of nowhere and winning an election. I mean, we make movies about that kind of story. Republicans especially LOVE that kind of man. The every man! A normal Joe, a common person. It worked for Robin Williams, eh?

I mean, the Republican party is probably the only group of people who can simultaneously call Obama an elitist and a nobody without their heads imploding. Not to mention the only party that can revere an actor as if he were the second coming of Christ, just to be terrified of an opponent people get excited about. If anything, it's a great way to clarify who the dittoheads are.

I would say obama since he seems only one with his head screwed on when it comes to foreign policy and actually resolving conflict in middle east and help redeveloping afghanistan and other things. Someone like mccaine who would like flexing us military's muscles specially with things like iran i certainly would prefer not to get dragged into more messes then what's been done in afghanistan etc. He also only respectful person i've seen running for election so that's where my choice would lay.

I see in the overwhelming news about McCain not knowing how many homes he owns, you didn't hear that he actually owns none of them, and many news agencies can't even get the number right for who does.

Oh, his wife owns the seven homes, not him. I guess you can't be expected to know how many houses your wife has. Well, hopefully, if he ever gets divorced again, he'll get half.

McCain. He seems more in touch with wealth creation.

I don't see what the big deal is with the question about his houses. It's not only irrelevant, but it really is difficult to answer as property will rarely be registered to the owner's name. Wealthy people have complex tax strategies, so it really was a useless question to ask.

Oh, his wife owns the seven homes, not him. I guess you can't be expected to know how many houses your wife has. Well, hopefully, if he ever gets divorced again, he'll get half.

Did you even read the link or find out if they really all under her name (which they aren't)? Have some objectivity for once in your life.

Im thinking McCain. Honestly ive had enough with all these 3rd world countries pushing us about, asking for aid, selling us their oil and crops, allowing us to vacation there and basically being poor and undeserving. Its obvious Jebus doesnt like them, he favors the rich. Its about time America elected a real war monger, Nixon style, so the developed world can finally put these poor people in their place. Obviously bomb Iran as his first act and probably nuke Russia as well. If that doesnt start world war 3 and bring about the rapture I dont know what will. Then me, McCain, Bush, Bill O'Reilly and the seven fattest kings of Europe can sit on our clouds and watch the heathens burn in hell.

Or on the other hand, Obama, he seems nice.

Oh and im pro choice, Bush should have been aborted.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!