[Non-US] Who do you want to win the US elections


  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. You choose

    • Obama
      141
    • McCain
      28
    • Neither
      20
    • Arnold Swarchenegger or another celeb (If it were possible)
      14


Recommended Posts

I don't want to sound racists, but I think McCain is only their because:

a) Hilary didn't have a chance

b) To give racists people a vote, so they don't have to have a black person in office.

I am not stating all Americans are racists, but I know there is some people out there that think this way. I want to see Obama win this, because I believe he is the best for this position at this time.

Arnie would make a great president, but of the choices I'd go for Obama. Partly because he'll be the first black president, partly because I think Clinton's term would be shadowed by the exploits and innuendos of Bill.

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

Obviously bomb Iran as his first act and probably nuke Russia as well.

I doubt that will be possible. Russians have war in their blood, they can take on any country if messed with. I haven't a clue on America but lets not go there.

Although I'm from America and 2 years short from voting, I am pro-Obama/Biden. Bush has literally ruined our reputation with the other countries and has ruined the economy as well with the pointless war. I understand it is for their oil, but it is ruining our economy far beyond belief. All the money used to pay for the Country's debt is all gone to that. Don't forget all the lives taken. We here in L.A. have so many cracks and holes in the streets its just crazy. Finally, 8 years is enough for the Republican party.

My 2 cents

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

Actually she has more experience than Obama. Obama's never been in an executive position, and she has been as a mayor (mind you of a small town, but executive power nonetheless) and as governor for 20 months. In the three and a half years Obama has been a senator, he's only been present 140 some odd times, and this doesn't equate to actually voting. Maybe I should become a Senator... do nothing and skip work all the time.

Actually she has more experience than Obama. Obama's never been in an executive position, and she has been as a mayor (mind you of a small town, but executive power nonetheless) and as governor for 20 months. In the three and a half years Obama has been a senator, he's only been present 140 some odd times, and this doesn't equate to actually voting. Maybe I should become a Senator... do nothing and skip work all the time.

The whole experience argument is out the window--stop pushing it. If your opponent is a governor, you accuse him or her of lacking foreign-policy experience. If he or she is a member of Congress, you say this person has never run anything.

Palin's executive experience is nothing to hamper on about. My college president presides over more students than Palin did at Wasilla. (18k vs 5k)

The whole experience argument is out the window--stop pushing it. If your opponent is a governor, you accuse him or her of lacking foreign-policy experience. If he or she is a member of Congress, you say this person has never run anything.

Palin's executive experience is nothing to hamper on about. My college president presides over more students than Palin did at Wasilla. (18k vs 5k)

I'm not pushing that argument (I think it's the first time I've mentioned it here). I'm not arguing for or against her experience, rather the lack thereof. Obama's making it an issue by claiming he has more than her, but what he is utterly failing to realize of his childish argument is that Palin is not on the top of the ticket, McCain is. By arguing the experience notion, he's admitting his lack of experience. The whole "heart beat away from being President" vouch is being harped on too much as well. The stage is set, and there are defining issues between the candidates that clearly spell the direction they're going to take us.

I'm not pushing that argument (I think it's the first time I've mentioned it here). I'm not arguing for or against her experience, rather the lack thereof. Obama's making it an issue by claiming he has more than her, but what he is utterly failing to realize of his childish argument is that Palin is not on the top of the ticket, McCain is. By arguing the experience notion, he's admitting his lack of experience. The whole "heart beat away from being President" vouch is being harped on too much as well. The stage is set, and there are defining issues between the candidates that clearly spell the direction they're going to take us.

I'm not sure who is saying what [about their experience] on their own ticket, but experience itself has really no good showing on the virtues of a good presidency. The entire thing should be thrown out for the candidacy of a president/vice president. This has been proved time and time again in the past--GWB, Nixon, Harding.

Obama climbs to 66% in poll ? of Canadians

Sep 03, 2008 07:14 PM

THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA?A new polls says Canadians are five times more likely to pick Barack Obama than John McCain when asked who they would support if they could vote in the U.S. presidential election.

The Canadian Press Harris/Decima survey released Wednesday indicates that 66 per cent of those polled would select Obama, the Democratic candidate.

On the other hand, the poll suggests that only 13 per cent would vote for McCain, the Republican.

When Harris/Decima last polled Canadians on the U.S. election in May, Obama had the support of 56 per cent of respondents, compared with 15 per cent for McCain.

"The passage of time and awareness of Barack Obama has served to increase his popularity in Canada, while Senator McCain is inspiring few people north of the border," said Bruce Anderson, president of Harris/Decima.

"While some Canadians are unsure whether an Obama win will be good from the standpoint of healthy trade relationships, there is a very broad expectation that a President Obama will create better relationships between the U.S. and the rest of the world."

In the latest poll, 66 per cent of Canadians polled predicted an Obama victory in the November election, compared with 18 per cent who expected McCain to become the next president.

When asked which of them would be a better outcome for Canada's economic interests, more than half replied that it would be Obama, 53 per cent, compared with 20 per cent for McCain.

When asked which of the two candidates would be a better outcome from the standpoint of world affairs, a majority, 65 per cent, answered Obama, compared with 14 per cent who chose McCain.

Across gender lines, Obama polled 68 per cent among women and 63 per cent among men.

There is no age gap in the preferences among Canadians. Among those aged under 35, 65 per cent would choose Obama, compared with 66 per cent of those over 50.

McCain was picked by 14 per cent of Canadians under 35, compared with 13 per cent of those over 50.

The poll's other findings:

- Residents of B.C. (71 per cent), Quebec (70 per cent), and Atlantic Canada (69 per cent) were most supportive of Obama. McCain's support is strongest in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (23 per cent), followed by Alberta (21 per cent).

- Conservative party supporters were the most inclined to vote for McCain. But even among these respondents, Obama would still win by a 55-27 margin. Obama is the overwhelming favourite among Liberals (82 per cent vs. 8 per cent), Green party supporters (80 per cent vs. 10 per cent) and NDP supporters (78 per cent vs. 6 per cent).

Just over 1,000 Canadians were interviewed by phone between Aug. 28 and 31. A sample of this size has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/490179

I was thoroughly impressed with Obama's remarks regarding same-sex marriage. His stand is to provide the same rights and privileges as married couples but leave it up to religious institutions if they would actually marry people of the same sex.

The President's job is to ensure that same sex couples have all the rights, freedoms, protections, and privileges as married heterosexual couples. Whether or not it's called a "marriage" is NOT the job of the government - it never really has been. This is exactly what Obama has declared to do.

At first I wanted Hilary to be nominated to run for Democrats but since Obama won I will want him to be President. Its a shame he didn't pick Hilary as his running mate, would had been a great presidency.

As for McCain, I do not follow his views, his choice of VP was bizarre. Only met her once before he announced her. He obviously didn;t check on her much as all these secrets are coming out such as her 17 year old being pregnant. She does not have the experience either!

So for me, Obama should win the US elections.

For me none of candidates seemed that great but I guess its impossible to have the perfect candidate. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich had some good plans.

If I had to choose between Obama or McCain it would be without a doubt Obama.

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

remind me, when was the last time that obama was governor of a state?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!