[Non-US] Who do you want to win the US elections


  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. You choose

    • Obama
      141
    • McCain
      28
    • Neither
      20
    • Arnold Swarchenegger or another celeb (If it were possible)
      14


Recommended Posts

I don't want to sound racists, but I think McCain is only their because:

a) Hilary didn't have a chance

b) To give racists people a vote, so they don't have to have a black person in office.

I am not stating all Americans are racists, but I know there is some people out there that think this way. I want to see Obama win this, because I believe he is the best for this position at this time.

Arnie would make a great president, but of the choices I'd go for Obama. Partly because he'll be the first black president, partly because I think Clinton's term would be shadowed by the exploits and innuendos of Bill.

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

Obviously bomb Iran as his first act and probably nuke Russia as well.

I doubt that will be possible. Russians have war in their blood, they can take on any country if messed with. I haven't a clue on America but lets not go there.

Although I'm from America and 2 years short from voting, I am pro-Obama/Biden. Bush has literally ruined our reputation with the other countries and has ruined the economy as well with the pointless war. I understand it is for their oil, but it is ruining our economy far beyond belief. All the money used to pay for the Country's debt is all gone to that. Don't forget all the lives taken. We here in L.A. have so many cracks and holes in the streets its just crazy. Finally, 8 years is enough for the Republican party.

My 2 cents

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

Actually she has more experience than Obama. Obama's never been in an executive position, and she has been as a mayor (mind you of a small town, but executive power nonetheless) and as governor for 20 months. In the three and a half years Obama has been a senator, he's only been present 140 some odd times, and this doesn't equate to actually voting. Maybe I should become a Senator... do nothing and skip work all the time.

Actually she has more experience than Obama. Obama's never been in an executive position, and she has been as a mayor (mind you of a small town, but executive power nonetheless) and as governor for 20 months. In the three and a half years Obama has been a senator, he's only been present 140 some odd times, and this doesn't equate to actually voting. Maybe I should become a Senator... do nothing and skip work all the time.

The whole experience argument is out the window--stop pushing it. If your opponent is a governor, you accuse him or her of lacking foreign-policy experience. If he or she is a member of Congress, you say this person has never run anything.

Palin's executive experience is nothing to hamper on about. My college president presides over more students than Palin did at Wasilla. (18k vs 5k)

The whole experience argument is out the window--stop pushing it. If your opponent is a governor, you accuse him or her of lacking foreign-policy experience. If he or she is a member of Congress, you say this person has never run anything.

Palin's executive experience is nothing to hamper on about. My college president presides over more students than Palin did at Wasilla. (18k vs 5k)

I'm not pushing that argument (I think it's the first time I've mentioned it here). I'm not arguing for or against her experience, rather the lack thereof. Obama's making it an issue by claiming he has more than her, but what he is utterly failing to realize of his childish argument is that Palin is not on the top of the ticket, McCain is. By arguing the experience notion, he's admitting his lack of experience. The whole "heart beat away from being President" vouch is being harped on too much as well. The stage is set, and there are defining issues between the candidates that clearly spell the direction they're going to take us.

I'm not pushing that argument (I think it's the first time I've mentioned it here). I'm not arguing for or against her experience, rather the lack thereof. Obama's making it an issue by claiming he has more than her, but what he is utterly failing to realize of his childish argument is that Palin is not on the top of the ticket, McCain is. By arguing the experience notion, he's admitting his lack of experience. The whole "heart beat away from being President" vouch is being harped on too much as well. The stage is set, and there are defining issues between the candidates that clearly spell the direction they're going to take us.

I'm not sure who is saying what [about their experience] on their own ticket, but experience itself has really no good showing on the virtues of a good presidency. The entire thing should be thrown out for the candidacy of a president/vice president. This has been proved time and time again in the past--GWB, Nixon, Harding.

Obama climbs to 66% in poll ? of Canadians

Sep 03, 2008 07:14 PM

THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA?A new polls says Canadians are five times more likely to pick Barack Obama than John McCain when asked who they would support if they could vote in the U.S. presidential election.

The Canadian Press Harris/Decima survey released Wednesday indicates that 66 per cent of those polled would select Obama, the Democratic candidate.

On the other hand, the poll suggests that only 13 per cent would vote for McCain, the Republican.

When Harris/Decima last polled Canadians on the U.S. election in May, Obama had the support of 56 per cent of respondents, compared with 15 per cent for McCain.

"The passage of time and awareness of Barack Obama has served to increase his popularity in Canada, while Senator McCain is inspiring few people north of the border," said Bruce Anderson, president of Harris/Decima.

"While some Canadians are unsure whether an Obama win will be good from the standpoint of healthy trade relationships, there is a very broad expectation that a President Obama will create better relationships between the U.S. and the rest of the world."

In the latest poll, 66 per cent of Canadians polled predicted an Obama victory in the November election, compared with 18 per cent who expected McCain to become the next president.

When asked which of them would be a better outcome for Canada's economic interests, more than half replied that it would be Obama, 53 per cent, compared with 20 per cent for McCain.

When asked which of the two candidates would be a better outcome from the standpoint of world affairs, a majority, 65 per cent, answered Obama, compared with 14 per cent who chose McCain.

Across gender lines, Obama polled 68 per cent among women and 63 per cent among men.

There is no age gap in the preferences among Canadians. Among those aged under 35, 65 per cent would choose Obama, compared with 66 per cent of those over 50.

McCain was picked by 14 per cent of Canadians under 35, compared with 13 per cent of those over 50.

The poll's other findings:

- Residents of B.C. (71 per cent), Quebec (70 per cent), and Atlantic Canada (69 per cent) were most supportive of Obama. McCain's support is strongest in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (23 per cent), followed by Alberta (21 per cent).

- Conservative party supporters were the most inclined to vote for McCain. But even among these respondents, Obama would still win by a 55-27 margin. Obama is the overwhelming favourite among Liberals (82 per cent vs. 8 per cent), Green party supporters (80 per cent vs. 10 per cent) and NDP supporters (78 per cent vs. 6 per cent).

Just over 1,000 Canadians were interviewed by phone between Aug. 28 and 31. A sample of this size has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/490179

I was thoroughly impressed with Obama's remarks regarding same-sex marriage. His stand is to provide the same rights and privileges as married couples but leave it up to religious institutions if they would actually marry people of the same sex.

The President's job is to ensure that same sex couples have all the rights, freedoms, protections, and privileges as married heterosexual couples. Whether or not it's called a "marriage" is NOT the job of the government - it never really has been. This is exactly what Obama has declared to do.

At first I wanted Hilary to be nominated to run for Democrats but since Obama won I will want him to be President. Its a shame he didn't pick Hilary as his running mate, would had been a great presidency.

As for McCain, I do not follow his views, his choice of VP was bizarre. Only met her once before he announced her. He obviously didn;t check on her much as all these secrets are coming out such as her 17 year old being pregnant. She does not have the experience either!

So for me, Obama should win the US elections.

For me none of candidates seemed that great but I guess its impossible to have the perfect candidate. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich had some good plans.

If I had to choose between Obama or McCain it would be without a doubt Obama.

Neither one of them, but anyone other than McCain fries. I can't imagine his VP running as president, she would be a laughing stock, someone less qualified than Obama. Love how her husband is in the alaskan oil business, what's with that and Republican running mates.. hmmm.. :whistle:

remind me, when was the last time that obama was governor of a state?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!