Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2 - seriously bloated


Recommended Posts

I wonder why people really care if a program uses 500mb ram, as long as it free's it up when closing, and, as long as it does not use 100% cpu while running. people seem to think that the less memory footprint, the better it is (goes only for torrent clients, as ?torrent is king <- my opinion).

Most people have 2gb or more nowadays, and "even in vista" you will not notice a program using 500mb on the preformance of your computer.

Why? Because that ram can be better used elsewhere. Sure unused ram is wasted ram but so is ram which is being needlessly used. Rather than having a browser use 400MB more than it reasonably should need I'd rather the OS was allocating that ram so that other programs can boot faster and the like.

And people WILL notice the performance if by using 500MB the browser is taking too much ram on a system that is running other ram intensive applications.

Rams there to be used, but only if it's used wisely and as needed otherwise it's still denying memory to other applications that could better use it.

Wow, sounds like another article from another ranting idiot.

Exactly.

S/he is probably a fully-paid-up member of the Norton hate club also.

I have tried this.

It's fast low on resources and far from bloat.

It's their best yet.

Hopefully it fits web standards and all that this time.

10 years ago beta 5 was released so they have had time to fall in line.

I have however, removed it, due to my bank won't allow it via on-line banking.

350-400MB memory footprint

hmm... does it mean RAM usage or does it mean RAM + virtual memory usage?

I'm opening 8 tabs in Chrome, and about:memory says it's using 60MB RAM and 280MB virtual memory, so if the 350MB memory footprint means RAM + Virtual Memory usage, then it's not really that bad.

Also it'd be a bit stupid to say it uses more memory than Windows XP if that's the case, since Windows XP uses a LOT of virtual memory.

if u dnt like it then dnt use it. no1 is forcin u

Wow! What school of higher learning did you attend? :laugh:

I will definitely give IE 8 a spin, but surely not while in beta!! As good as MS is at screwing thing up, I'm not about to try this until finished!

Wow! What school of higher learning did you attend? :laugh:

I will definitely give IE 8 a spin, but surely not while in beta!! As good as MS is at screwing thing up, I'm not about to try this until finished!

Seriously, it's best to wait for beta 2 as all the beta 1 problems should have been sorted.

Just make an image, install it, try it for a hour or so, then restore your image back.

It's like stepping out from driving a ford escort into a subaru pretsa, that extra bite.

350-400MB memory footprint

hmm... does it mean RAM usage or does it mean RAM + virtual memory usage?

I'm opening 8 tabs in Chrome, and about:memory says it's using 60MB RAM and 280MB virtual memory, so if the 350MB memory footprint means RAM + Virtual Memory usage, then it's not really that bad.

Also it'd be a bit stupid to say it uses more memory than Windows XP if that's the case, since Windows XP uses a LOT of virtual memory.

you sure it doesn't just use that much because it is free and being unused, so it can be fast as possible. most users of ie8 won't even know what ram is, they just want it to be fast. does ie8 give up some of the ram if other programs need it?

also im sure it isn't at the opitmizing stage of the development yet

Maybe because some people like to multi task or run vm ware?

The fact RAM is cheap isn't an excuse for an application to run inefficiently and hog it all. If there are alternatives that can do the same thing faster and using less resources which one are you going to choose? Oh yeah you are sticking up for IE....

I don't know what OS you're using, but any good OS can page out memory to disk.

Even Windows 95 could free up physical ram if an app needed it.

I don't know what OS you're using, but any good OS can page out memory to disk.

Even Windows 95 could free up physical ram if an app needed it.

And the point of having RAM is so you don't need to do that, so that you have fast access to data as needed. The ability to offload memory to the hard disk should never be seen as an excuse or justification for the inefficient use of RAM.

1. If its THAT much of a problem, just close it when you want to multi-task/play a game

2. If you are multi-tasking and some sort of compulsion makes you want to free up ur ram...use a different browser.

3. If you have a computer good enough to run Vista well (i.e. multi-core, 2gig ram e.t.c.) you can probably afford to ignore IE until you start dealing with bigger apps.

4. "Fan bois" is a spelling mistake.

5. As everyone says, it is beta software and IMHO has come a long way since the last beta.

what the heck does 'Scirwode' mean?!

It's the guys name. He does that, along with a few others, when it would be much better just to use the signature field. Like most people would. :rolleyes: , if they bothered. It's not like the name isn't to the left of the post anyway.

It's the guys name. He does that, along with a few others, when it would be much better just to use the signature field. Like most people would. :rolleyes: , if they bothered. It's not like the name isn't to the left of the post anyway.

Yea, thats always puzzled the hell out of me. Seems pointless, especially when all they post is a " :D " etc.

if u dnt like it then dnt use it. no1 is forcin u

Hmm, let me fix this for you:

If you don't like it, then don't use it. No one is forcing you.

That is true, but no matter what Microsoft throws out, people will love it, people will hate it, and what not. Someone just wants to be the first to bash the new product, and find flaws. No one seems to give constructive criticism anymore, and only post blog entries about why it will fail, and why it sucks. You can't please everyone, so just do what you think is "best" and see who else adapts to it. People wonder why Microsoft releases so many versions of its operating systems, so people have choice, which a lot of people feel is bloating and crowding.

If the BETA takes up too much space and ram, then don't install it? Alot of that extra will be stripped once the debugging kit is removed

Well after hearing about Chrome on the news I downloaded it and... big dissapointment. Then I heard about how great IE8 is and how it's better than Chrome... downloaded that beta and... another huge letdown.

After using firefox with it's great extensions everything else is unworkable.

Chrome feels more like an alpha than an open beta.

I can't even begin to describe how many things are wrong with I.E.8 beta but suffice it to say that if you're an IE fanboy stick to version 7.

True. According to your logic, unused processor power is wasted (shouldn't windows use 100% of your cpu power 24 hours per day so it's not considered wasted?)and I pretty much believe that it's not using your harddrive as well. (why isn't your hdd spinning at 7200 rpm 24 hours per day?, even better why isn't windows filling your entire hdd space, it unused resource, isn't it?).

i seriously doubt whether half of you even understand the word 'beta' -> its not bloody complete, features are being tested/built and improvements are ongoing, so stop complaining about something that hasn't even hit RC yet, and bloody give them a chance to improve the browser before you start the nagging. :hmmm:

FYI, number of threads is a meaningless number for any application.

Virtual memory usage may appear higher than it actually is for any application that spawns multiple processes which shared resources (memory-mapped files, etc).

I wonder why people really care if a program uses 500mb ram, as long as it free's it up when closing, and, as long as it does not use 100% cpu while running. people seem to think that the less memory footprint, the better it is (goes only for torrent clients, as ?torrent is king <- my opinion).

Why does it go for torrents only? What makes it a unique case? Is it because the author of uTorrent proves to everyone that youcan> write programs that are efficient and light that you believe so?

Yes, free RAM is wasted RAM but when a program uses 200mb of RAM when it can perform just as well with 150mb of RAM, it ain't efficient. Sure some of us have loads of RAM, but as a programmer you can't assume that everyone will have the ideal specs. Think of games here because games must be (normally) efficient. When the RAM usage of a browser reaches the amount that of a game like Quake 3 or anything of those days, that's ****ed up.

Most people have 2gb or more nowadays, and "even in vista" you will not notice a program using 500mb on the preformance of your computer.

Most people have 2gb or more. Oh really? What, most people on Neowin, or in America? Or in the World? Or most computers sold today have 2GB? Back those numbers up but it's safer to assume that most people nowadays have an amount closer to 1GB of RAM. Not every person upgrades and buys new computers... Some people have a 4-5 year old computer to browse the web and use Office and such. Soon they'll have to upgrade to browse the web? I'll repeat, that's ****ed up.

People keep ranting away on memory usage.

btw; i think photoshop is bloated, it uses 1400mb memory while i edit high resolution photographs.

Horrible comparison that I won't even dispute.

Way a go at encouraging programmers for being lazier.

and his website has been added to my router's block list...

The same uneducated rant as Vista is bloated, used too much RAM, blah blah... Go get a life, it is only a browser, use what you see fit.

Unused RAM is wasted RAM, period.

don't you have the constraint to stop yourself from going to it?

Bottom price PC now come with 2/3 Gb of RAM and better one now with 4Gb, check that out at your local store.

And if you're a advanced user (Joe user don't need VmWare), well, upgrade! It's time to move to 8Gb of Ram.

As a power user, I never check the amount of memory taken by the apps that I use. And If I need more, I'm going to buy more, it's cheap anyway.

No Truck, nothing sells in 2/3GB units. You get 512 in the very cheapest units. And most people won't go near a RAM upgrade without the PC World Tech guys, which is a ****ing ripoff, and they're the one's most likely to use IE8, the non-ICT minded ones.

Bottom price PC now come with 2/3 Gb of RAM and better one now with 4Gb, check that out at your local store.

And if you're a advanced user (Joe user don't need VmWare), well, upgrade! It's time to move to 8Gb of Ram.

As a power user, I never check the amount of memory taken by the apps that I use. And If I need more, I'm going to buy more, it's cheap anyway.

Right, you're right as far as what's on sale in stores. How about you now think of what's in the homes today? Not as easy right?

If you blindly assume that most people out there have 2GB of ram in their homes, clearly your view on reality is skewed and it shows that either you live in the internet, or your social interraction is very limited. When only about 38% of gamers have 2GB of RAM, you can safely assume that a smaller percentage of average PC's out there used for Office and Web navigation/email have 2GB of RAM. When you consider the number of Steam subscribers out there, it does a pretty good job at representing the population.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!