Ghostbusters 3 (Rumours and Discussion)


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
More good news on the ghost busting front as Production Weekly is reporting that they've heard Sony's Columbia Pictures is aiming at a May 2011 start date for Ghostbusters 3, which would put it as part of their monster 2012 line-up. It was reported last month that Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky's latest rewrite was approved, with a little help from producer/star Dan Aykroyd. As of this writing, Ivan Reitman will direct with Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, Bill Murray, Ernie Hudson, Rick Moranis and Sigourney Weaver returning to star. The plot is said to revolve around Dana and Peter's lovechild, Oscar, and his new found job as a "Ghost Buster".

Wait, "lovechild?" I was always under the impression that Oscar was the child of Dana and the other musician. I smell plot hole. I sure as hell hope Peter doesn't turn into a ghost.

Oscar still is.. I think Peter became his Stepfather.

Wait, "lovechild?" I was always under the impression that Oscar was the child of Dana and the other musician. I smell plot hole. I sure as hell hope Peter doesn't turn into a ghost.

Yeah. I heard this will be explained in the story.

  • 3 weeks later...
Upon new rumors and casting calls for Ghostbusters 3 making their way online, website What's Playing did some digging through their Sony Pictures contact who may have leaked some potential casting news.
"Asked whether he knew anything about [Anna Faris] being onboard, he replied 'Dunno. First I?ve heard of it. Heard Will Forte?s name mentioned and Bill Hader, but not Faris. I?m not in on all that though, so she could be;
[sony] does like her'. " Forte and Hader landing roles alongside "Saturday Night Live" alumni could be pretty freakin' cool. Obviously, none of this is confirmed so keep this filed under "rumor" until further notice. Being directed by Ivan Reitman, Harold Ramis, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Rick Moranis and Sigourney Weaver are all said to be returning. Lead by Dana and Peter's lovechild, Oscar, a new breed of Ghost Busters are passed the torch...
  • 1 month later...
Ivan Reitman Says Most Reports About ?Ghostbusters 3′ Are Wrong

Update: ComingSoon also talked to the director, who said,

There is almost nothing that is accurate online about that film? There is nothing? I mean, all these stories? there has been a ton of stuff about casting, about who?s in? none of it is true.

Asked specifically about Dana?s son taking the reins and Venkman being a ghost, he said,

Oh, no, yeah? I mean, Sigourney Weaver has a role in this movie. All the original characters have parts. As well as a whole bunch of new characters? it?s got a really good story, this one. Maybe the best of the whole series. I hope we get to do it.

http://www.slashfilm.com/ivan-reitman-virtually-ghostbusters-3-wrong/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+slashfilm+%28%2FFilm%29&utm_content=FaceBook

  • 1 month later...

Earlier this week Ivan Reitman had told fans that Bill Murray has in fact read the script for the planned 3rd 'Ghostbusters' film, well we now know this in fact to be false as Bill Murray himself has cleared this up this morning on the Howard Stern Show.

Murray revealed that he has in fact NOT yet read the script and said he feels bad about having not read it. He also talked about how 'Ghostbusters 2' turned him off about the idea of sequels; and how doing 'Ghostbusters 3 isn't even on his mind because the only reason Sony wants another movie is to recreate the franchise.

-

Howard Stern: Is it true that there is a Ghostbusters 3 and that you’re the problem and you will not sign off on this? Do you know about this?

Bill Murray: Yeah, I guess I’m the problem. Before I was an asset, [but] now I’m a problem. There’s a script somewhere [on my desk], but I haven’t read it yet.

- Why haven’t you read it? Is it because you think it’s a bullsh*t idea? In other words, Ghostbusters has had its time and you did a remarkable job with that and you’ve moved on?

BM: There’s a little bit of that. I only made one sequel and it was Ghostbusters 2 and it didn’t end up the way it was presented.

About five years after we did the first one, the clever agents got us all together in a room and… we really are funny together, I mean they are funny people – Harold [Ramis] and Danny [Aykroyd] and myself, with Ivan [Reitman] and maybe one or two other people. We were just blindingly funny for about an hour or so and the agents, there was just foam coming off of them.

They had this pitch and Danny and Harold had concocted some story ideas… and it was a story, it was good story. I think I had even read one or two [scripts for Ghostbusters 2] that Danny had rolled out beforehand, but this one was a good one. I said, “Ok, we can do that one.”

It was just kind of fun to have all of us together… I mean [Rick] Moranis, Annie [Potts] – these people are just sterling people to begin with.

- Robin Quivers: So you have no interest?

BM: Well, I’ll get to it… I gotta get to it – I feel bad. I got a message and I think people – I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings – it’s not the foremost thing in my mind, so I don’t think about it.

You know, the studio gets excited every 10 years or so. What they’d really like to do is recreate the franchise. I remember when the new Ghostbusters was going to be Chris Rock, Chris Farley and Chris Crane… Kris Kringle… someone [laughs] – that had it together.

http://screenrant.com/bill-murray-ghostbusters-3-howard-stern-aco-102496/

Is it really that hard to write a good enough script to get Murray interested enough? They should've made GB3 like, 15 years ago if you ask me. Either way, I'll take a 3rd movie gladdly and I think the story in the game was good as well, that could've been done as a movie and have worked well I think.

Is it really that hard to write a good enough script to get Murray interested enough? They should've made GB3 like, 15 years ago if you ask me. Either way, I'll take a 3rd movie gladdly and I think the story in the game was good as well, that could've been done as a movie and have worked well I think.

I think his apprehension is absolutely warranted, but Ghostbusters 2 wasn't a bad movie at all. It just wasn't as good as the first. I think his main qualm is seeing the franchise milked to death, which he doesn't want. I can respect that. I'd still love to see this get made, though.

I think his apprehension is absolutely warranted, but Ghostbusters 2 wasn't a bad movie at all. It just wasn't as good as the first. I think his main qualm is seeing the franchise milked to death, which he doesn't want. I can respect that. I'd still love to see this get made, though.

Well, since it took so long to do even a game I can't say it's really milking it. Most hit franchises at least get a triliogy IMO. I just sit back and wonder how great a GB movie would be with todays FX etc.

Well, since it took so long to do even a game I can't say it's really milking it. Most hit franchises at least get a triliogy IMO. I just sit back and wonder how great a GB movie would be with todays FX etc.

I meant that he doesn't want to see it milked to death -- read the last response, for example.

I consider the original Ghostbusters to be one of my all time favourite films. The only other favourite movie of mine they recently "rebooted" was Predator/Predators and I thought that movie stank.

So whilst I'd love to see another Ghostbusters movie, honestly I'd rather just enjoy the ones we already have rather than risk a stinker of a sequel.

  • 2 years later...

Dan Aykroyd is still talking this thing up, and this time around he actually offers some fairly concrete plot details:

?We?re going to have to cast. We need four new ghostbusters. We need four new Columbia students. It?s based upon new research that?s being done in particle physics by the young men and women at Columbia University. Basically there?s research being done that?I can say that the world or our dimension that we live in, our four planes of existence, length, height, width, and time, become threatened by some of the research that is being done. And Ghostbusters, new Ghostbusters have to come and some the problem.?
  • 5 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!