UFO hacker is broken man, says family


Recommended Posts

Good point - putting something under the most mega extreme super ultra high security is basically waving a flag at hackers.

Whereas placing that design for free energy on standard Windows ME installation is not :p

If I remember correctly, he said a lot of the systems were actually running Windows 98

If they were running ME, he wouldn't have been able to find anything because of all the crashing :p

yes i'd be ****ed, would i want the person responsible to be tried as a terrorist? no.
thats the point, he isn't being asked to be let off etc, he's accepting a punishment but not one from the 'ZOMG HE'S A TERRORIST!!!!!' style US

Who has said he is going to be tried as a terrorist? McKinnon, thats it. He's the one creating this whole circus by his BS.

*edit* Oh, and by the way. I hope they do fry his ass. I have a son with Aspergers, and his disgusting attempts to try and suddenly at 42 get diagnosed and use it as a negotiating tool make me want to be sick. He degrades the millions out there with that disorder.

You start to feel sorry for him, he did do wrong yes, but what he did HELPS the USA by blocking the way he hacked in so nobody else does. I say, let him free/keep him in Britain!

He didn't help terrorism, drug deals, ANYTHING, he shouldn't need 70 years in America :s

I smell a CIA conspiracy. I can already see the title of the documentary 30 years from now.

I also would like to see what he dug up. I wonder if they'll get released in discovery (i.e. the evidence given by prosecutors to the defense attorney NOT the channel :laugh:) :p

well, he should have been out looking for a job...and besides? don't they have UFO's in the UK..or is that just Trolls and Knomes...LOL

besides, I doubt if he will even get close to 70 years. I'm sure Gordon Brown or your Queen will work something out.

I love americans' perception of the Queen. She's a tourist attraction --> she should be in a museum, not in (theoretical) control.

How is laughing about trolls and gnomes funny? They're real. That's all :shiftyninja:

If he really found evidence of UFOs and coverups why did he not IMMEDIATLY transfer it and upload it to every torrent and file sharing site in the world?? If i found something that important that i thought the world should know id be posting it all over the internet as soon as i found it.

If he really found evidence of UFOs and coverups why did he not IMMEDIATLY transfer it and upload it to every torrent and file sharing site in the world?? If i found something that important that i thought the world should know id be posting it all over the internet as soon as i found it.

He was using dial-up and I believe torrents weren't even around yet when he was doing this.

Ever downloaded raw NASA images? They can be hundred's of MB's in size.

Another thing. Put yourself in his shoes. You're a hacker, you're looking for evidence that UFO's and aliens are real and you actually find it. If it were me, I'd be more shocked I actually found it and would be looking at everything I could. Saving the stuff would probably be the last thing on my mind because I'd be too shocked most likely.

One other thing that someone else brought up. I've read a lot about the guy and his case and I've never read anything about him being offered a plea deal for 5-10 by the US. The UK busted him and it was like they really didn't care until the US got involved and they've been trying to get him over here since then. Might be something I've missed, but I've never heard about that.

I think you are missing the point here.. HE HACKED into Government computers.. I don't give a rats a$$ if he was looking for UFO's or a copy of his birth certificate, he hacked into government computers. I mean come on.. how do WE know what he looked at? They also said he deleted some files...

Would you NOT be ****ed off and want to sue some person for hacking into your computer? Especially if he deleted some of your files?

Hey, ho, YOU should be ashamed of your army computer security systems. Personally, I would feel so bad I would hire him to know how he got in. But obviously the great American government are going to treat this guy like he's some kind of crazy demon terrorist and send him in jail for 70 years.

Like, I'm not saying that what he did is wise and just, or even intelligent for that matter. I'm not saying he shouldn't be punish in some way for doing this... one of the way would be to teach the super good security engineers that works for the army how to protect such an important system.

Even more, if I was living in the U.S., I would bring a class action suit against my government for being so poor at protecting such sensible data belonging to my homeland....

my 2 cents

*EDIT* Like I read comments of people who said, hey! he might have deleted some ?ber important data! Here's my answer to you:

1- your a first class fool for believing that

2- so they didn't have backup of this ultra pimp information?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? what?!

3- like someone else said; so they put top classified info... on the Internet? hughh... enough said

Ohhh Emil, I read your comment and you really touched me there... somewhere special; your such a great human being

Edited by djesteban
I smell a CIA conspiracy. I can already see the title of the documentary 30 years from now.

I also would like to see what he dug up. I wonder if they'll get released in discovery (i.e. the evidence given by prosecutors to the defense attorney NOT the channel :laugh:) :p

they'll probably pull the state secret crap again

though i don't really buy the guy's story of having found alien technology either.

Hacking into US government computers is not my idea of a good thing to do :|

well, those who are responsible for the security of the US government computers should be punished more severely than the hacker.

And yea if there's really something important he has gained access to, trying to punish him severely is just more incentive for him to leak those stuff to the "enemies".

I don't feel sorry for the guy, he did something illegal and now has to face the consequences.

well, I don't think the point is whether the guy did something wrong, but whether the 70 years punishment as the consequences is right.

I'm sure some petty thief who has stolen your notebook will not face 70 years in jail as the consequences, so is it right for this UFO hacker to face such consequences?

Hmm, this is interesting. They most definitely know exactly what he has seen and what he "deleted", but why are they getting so hyped up about it... Makes me wonder exactly what's going on with the gov't these days, Area 51 still remains unseen.

It does not matter how easy or hard it was to break in. He broke into a computer system that he was not suppose to be in he deserves what ever he gets period. Breaking into a home with a cheap lock is still a crime same with computers.

my laptop != US government computers.

of course, but the question remains, does hacking into US government computers warrants someone getting extradited to US and jailed for 70 years? stealing your laptop won't, that's for sure, so what about hacking US government computers?

Especially in this case is that the best for US interest? If he really stolen something important, isn't harsher punishment more incentive for him to leak it in this case? If he didn't steal anything important, then why this harsh punishment?

It does not matter how easy or hard it was to break in. He broke into a computer system that he was not suppose to be in he deserves what ever he gets period. Breaking into a home with a cheap lock is still a crime same with computers.

Yea, then in this case, it does matter whether he really stole something important or not. Someone breaking into a home to steal $10 is still a crime, but won't be punished as severely as someone breaking into a home to steal a million dollars.

And in this case, since it's government security, those who produced the "cheapo lock" should also be punished. So those who are responsible for the security of the US government computers should be punished.

He deleted data, they kept of him, because the U.S. goverment keeps all data of everyone on the internet!!!

In the end all hackers of the world will unite and bring down america, after 10 years of panic and terror, they will make a movie about that.

We will buy t-shirts with "Save Gary McKinnon" like we did those back in the 90's "Save Kevin Mitnick"

yada... yada... yada... I think the U.S. is turning into a military country, a dictatorship like China, just that the american people don't know that, they don't see it. They don't see it that they are being watched by the govermend, controled and brainwashed. You have to stand ouside it to see it.

While I agree he needs to be punished somewhat for what he did, this old thread comes to mind (particularly this post) when he insists on not being extradited to the States for punishment.

If that's what happens when you get busted for piracy, imagine what happens in this case. :blink:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!