Girl Married at 9, slain by parents at 17


Recommended Posts

Look, sex with a 9 year old girl is wrong. Not because religion says so, not because culture says so. Because nature says so...

The risks of death in labour are incresed.

The risk of cervical cancer from sexual intercourse before puberty are increased.

The risk of hemooraging through intercourse are increased.

But hey, if you agree with it - form your own religion. Won't make it right though!

I completely agree with you and you know what? I always think when I see news like this about a 45 years old been with a 12 or 13 years old girl, do they they have their brain working properly? I mean I saw news before about an old ****ing man of 52 or 55 years old, don't remember the age exactly, but this ******* was raping her own daughter of 14 years old, I mean what the heck is going on with the brains of some people? It is really crazy. I am 32 years old and my wife is 29, I always going to work and going to college (trying to get my MBA) and I always see beautiful girls younger as 14 years old in the streets and everywhere but I don't desire her, in fact I don't have not interest in women of 20 years old or younger, called me boring or whatever you want but I have my brain very well organized and I don't have that sick concepts with younger women.

I think that is absolutely disgusting. Not just "some" of the story, but the WHOLE DAMN THING.

Killed for not wanting to be with a 45 year old. Then two other girls killed for wanting to marry someone of their choice, then the aunts killed for trying to rescue them, and being related.

Countries like this make me sick, and I think we should try to teach other countries to adapt such laws, rather then having to read about 45 year old men marrying 9 year olds.

Totally agree.

Pathetic....utterly pathetic.

And these people - people who supposedly follow the Qu'ran - want America & "The West" to be destroyed because they think that we are evil? These crimes against peoples are thousands of times worse than seeing Britney Spear's navel in a music video!

:angry:

ANY society - whether it is deeply tied to a belief-system that is so tightly wound-up that it is ingrained from birth...or not - that practices "honour-killing" or other similar atrocities should be cast-off and discarded as hubris. It is not exclusively part of traditions of peoples living in Islamic or primarily-islamic nations; it happens in India, Africa, Asia and many other countries. I think that the reason that there is so much focus on the Muslim societies is that we are told that Islam is a religion of peace...but facts like this smack of nothing less than being hypocritical. If you are going to follow Islam (or any other religion) you had better follow it completely - and not ignore tenents that are "inconvenient".

My personal beliefs compel me to forgive...but I know that God will exact his justice against them. :yes:

--ScottKin

I can say, with a fair amount of certainty, that a 45-year old man marrying a 9 year old child is about as wrong as anything can get.

His point was that right and wrong are not things that are set in stone. What if you were raised to believe 9 was a fine age to marry a girl?

Look, sex with a 9 year old girl is wrong. Not because religion says so, not because culture says so. Because nature says so...

The risks of death in labour are incresed.

The risk of cervical cancer from sexual intercourse before puberty are increased.

The risk of hemooraging through intercourse are increased.

But hey, if you agree with it - form your own religion. Won't make it right though!

Nature doesn't tell us what's right and wrong either. By extension, homosexuality is "wrong" because your species becomes limited in reproduction and dies out quicker.

/canofworms

Bless the girl's Spirit.

Yet I always find this interesting, and telling:

post-37120-1220757895_thumb.png

Of the new topics, a sexual story takes off most.

We are appalled -- but fascinated. ;)

No Hum, it is the most sickening of today this is why it gotten the most views....

Why don't the courts arrest and execute them on spot?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
    • For you to jump on and defend your sweetheart? I agree, it didn't.
    • Not likely, of course, that we will see routine citizenship checks as they only involve compliance with existing federal voting laws already on the books for decades. This seems a non-issue entirely. Only fools would have the government rush headlong into an AI program few can understand or predict, or even debug...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!