[Official] Crysis Warhead


Recommended Posts

Running DX10 with everything on "Gamer" I believe it is? ( High ) and Postprocessing Very High in 1680x1050 on my old 8800 Ultra, 4GB Ram and x6800 Core2Extreme with a steady 30-40 FPS.

They have really done a great job, although some scenes have been smothered in fog and stuff like that to loosen up the FPS.

You can probably do Enthusiast if you wanted too, I can and it plays amazingly.

Have a Core 2 Duo E6750, 4 GB RAM and an 8800 GTS (320 MB). Gamer ('High') is slow and Enthusiast ('Very High') is pretty much unplayable (1650x1050, no AA). I get amazing performance in 'Medium', though (60 FPS).

The server browser in Crysis Wars shows no pings and GameSpy Comrade doesn't start ("Comrade has stopped working"). I have tried re-installing Comrade, as well as .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1.

King, the 320MB is your problem. I have a very similar setup (see sig) and I know that's mine. I'm going to upgrade to the GTX 260 when prices on it go down. It still runs much better than the original, though. Only the ice levels are that slow for me. Funny, because they ran really well in the first game.

I just beat it, too. It was a whole lot more rewarding than the original Crysis, I'll say that much. The mission variety was also way better. Just more fun all-around. They fixed pretty much every complaint I had with the original.

Edit: Also, I've seen some people say they beat it in 4 hours. They must have really rushed through on purpose. It probably to me 6 I'd guess, and I'd say you could get well around 8-10 if you did every possible thing (sub-missions, kill everyone, etc). Felt a bit longer than the HL2 episodes, personally. Felt like the perfect length.

King, the 320MB is your problem. I have a very similar setup (see sig) and I know that's mine. I'm going to upgrade to the GTX 260 when prices on it go down. It still runs much better than the original, though. Only the ice levels are that slow for me. Funny, because they ran really well in the first game.

I just beat it, too. It was a whole lot more rewarding than the original Crysis, I'll say that much. The mission variety was also way better. Just more fun all-around. They fixed pretty much every complaint I had with the original.

Edit: Also, I've seen some people say they beat it in 4 hours. They must have really rushed through on purpose. It probably to me 6 I'd guess, and I'd say you could get well around 8-10 if you did every possible thing (sub-missions, kill everyone, etc). Felt a bit longer than the HL2 episodes, personally. Felt like the perfect length.

What? The ice level is a NIGHTMARE on the original crysis on my 9600gt, SLIDE shopw unless I turn it to medium. It runs fine on warhead though on very high.

There were tons of reports of the ice level in the original doing that on pretty much any card.

Few folk have said Pyscho is a bit cheesy and so is the story in places and I guess the whole Nuke thing has been done before but Im still early in so probs a plot twist or two yet. So far tho enjoying it, even to say a wee bit more than original, tho maybe Im just caught up in the hype. Need to see what later games like :)

haha yeah like his catch phrase "I'm british, you muppet"

@ Viper: Yes, I know, that's what I'm saying though. I'm the exact opposite for some reason.

When I first ran the ice level on the original Crysis it was a slideshow, then nVidia released better drivers and it was actually one of the smoothest sections of the game for me. Yet these ice levels in Warhead are running absolutely horrible while the rest of the game is running great.

It's probably got something to do with my graphics card, as I said... at least for Warhead. I don't know why the original ran well for me. Go figure.

1. hey guys, this is a little OT, but SHOULD i play the original Crysis before attempting to play Warhead?

2. My specs are e8400, 4gb ram, 8800gt, vista x64. I know a lot has had trouble with the original Crysis, but I am certain (i hope) that I will be able to run the original at at least medium settings.

1. Should you? It would slightly help understand the story, but you don't need to. Up to you.

2. Wait, what do you want to run at medium settings, the original or Warhead? Warhead will run great for you at medium ("Mainstream") settings because it runs great for me on those. Crysis should still run good since you have an 8800GT, which is actually better than my GTS by quite a bit.

1. hey guys, this is a little OT, but SHOULD i play the original Crysis before attempting to play Warhead?

2. My specs are e8400, 4gb ram, 8800gt, vista x64. I know a lot has had trouble with the original Crysis, but I am certain (i hope) that I will be able to run the original at at least medium settings.

Depending on the resolution you should be able to run the original on high and warhead on very high.

Use the natural mod on the original, makes it look as good as very high with better performance.

The ice levels were like a slideshow - so I quit it and launched it again, and they were really smooth.

I had the same issue with the original Crysis.

I finished it in about 4-5 hours on easy, doing everything, and absolutely loved it. Very high paced with lots of action. Highly recommended.

Now, I'm off to do it again, on a harder level (I tend to play games, starting on easy, and then replaying them, upping the difficulty each time, to increase the replayability of the game.)

I must admit, performance has certainly improved with Crysis Warhead?. Compared to the original I'd say it's better in almost every way. I'm still playing through the campaign so I don't know how it compares in terms of story duration. However, one thing I should bring up is the explosions. It looks better and it doesn't "lag" my computer (not even for a second). Here are my specs:

Intel Core2Duo E6750 @ 2.60 GHz

ATi Radeon HD 4850 512MB

Corsair 4GB DDR2-800 RAM

So, do you guys like multiplayer mode?
The server browser in Crysis Wars shows no pings and GameSpy Comrade doesn't start ("Comrade has stopped working"). I have tried re-installing Comrade, as well as .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1.

:(

Well, if it's anything like Crysis Multiplayer ... No thanks.

Tons of cheating, hit detection from hell, ADHD gameplay etc. etc.

Tbh I wasnt paying attention to some of that. But i was able to hit folk fine made some good kills with ranged shots thru the scope. Gameplay tis basic of team A vs team B or so I saw in my 1hr or so playing it. Reminds me a bit of HL2DM in its pace. Only prob is stealth is too easy to detect

As I stated earlier, no it will run like the first Crysis.

That's a shame. I guess they didn't have enough time to optimize it. It's either that, or it was developed around the time of Crysis and it simply wasn't released with it.

EDIT:

Crysis Benchmark

New details on Crysis Warhead 64bit

Edited by Anaron

The game looks aboslutely amazing. I am currently running everything on Enthusiast in 1280x1024 until I hook my PC up to my Samsung 32 1080p for some 1900x1200 gaming. I'll report back with some fps once I do that.

Besides graphically the game builds on everything from the first extremely well, kudos Crytek!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!