63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

_45047901_popup226body.jpg

Internet users are unable to distinguish between genuine pop-up warnings messages and false ones, a study at North Carolina State University has found.

The study examined the responses of undergraduates to messages which popped up while they did other tasks on a PC.

Seeing the pop-ups as a mere annoyance the majority clicked 'OK'.

Fake pop-ups are a well-known vehicle for cyber-criminals to install harmful software on PCs.

"This study demonstrates how easy it is to fool people on the web," said co-author Michael Wogalter, professor of psychology at North Carolina State University.

"Be suspicious when things pop up. Don't click OK - close the box instead," said Dr Wogalter."

Legitimate message

Participants were fooled by the fake messages 63% of the time, even when warned that some of what they would be seeing would be false.

It suggests that the wording on genuine messages needs to be rethought, said Dr Wogalter.

"I don't know if you could develop a legitimate message that could not be duplicated and used illegitimately," he said.

Tony Neate, managing director of the UK's Get Safe Online campaign advised users to install a pop-up blocker.

"Browsers and most anti-virus software offers them. Pop-ups are either downloading something malicious or trying to sell me something so I just don't want them there at all," he said.

Source: BBC News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/673478-63-users-fail-to-spot-fake-pop-ups/
Share on other sites

Have to say I agree with this. I can't tell you how many calls I get from people saying that a message popped up telling them that they had 1,500 viruses on their computer. Meanwhile, their virus scanner subscription expired a few years ago.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Most of them have the XP Style if the user is a vista user then they might relise it is fake as your not really going to get an XP Style popup on a vista aero theme.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

Edited by lord_xenos

^^ Man that's just a bit OTT

As an experienced computer user these things stick out like a sore thumb, but with 63% of people clicking them by mistake kinda suggests that it's a common problem and not just a error of judgement.

It really is easy to fall for, unless you know how windows displays every single error message and that it won't be apart of the IE shell.

I find popup blockers out of date now in my opinion, it's time web browsers block these URL's by default. If sites like zedo.com want to be intrusive with Javascript then why should we allow it in the first place. Google doesn't do it with their advertisements, why should they?

If someone on the street came up to you saying "BUY THIS, BUY THIS" and started jumping up and down around you then something would be done about it. It should be the same with the Internet.

I can easily tell the difference between a popup and a legit message lol. Because most of them look more and more real I can see why people click them, but if your cursor changes while you are anywhere on the box don't click :| lol.

My mum used to fall for these :laugh:

Can someone actually tell me, are these kind of popups completely legal?

Some of them are pretty damn deceiving (fake virus scans that actually look like a running application, ect).

...

It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

...

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

i think you mean the oppisite, i would consider myself an end user, and i never read browser popups, because i dont get any, and if i do, i never click, i usally put my mouse over it though to see if its all flash, because flash ads = 100% crapware aomost always.

Theres hardly any legitimate posts, unless im on a forum or so,and think its maybe a new message, i dont click.

Source: BBC News

Most annoying popup's to me aren't these fake ones. but the ones where they have a fake X I hit the X to get rid of the window and off it goes to the site. Try to use Opera just for those, but even Opera can't fix all of those.

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

Call it what you want, be it ignorance, stupidity, uninformed, or inexperienced. It all results in infections on the user's PC. Yes I said PC. I know Macs are less likely to be targeted for the reasons you already stated. I've met many people from both sides of the spectrum. Some have enough common sense to decipher a false pop-up, others aren't so fortunate and constantly go to the wrong sites, and click the wrong things. I do call it ignorance when a user does not pursue knowledge of what they are actually doing and what they can do to prevent what they know happens to "inexperienced" users (ie. infections). As a user of a PC and being on the Internet, I believe it is a responsibility this day in age to be informed.

Edited by lord_xenos
lol @ the Antivirus 2009 popup

clicking that makes for a fun time trying to get it off afterwards

Very true. The trick is to catch it as soon as it happens. I've been lucky a few times when the user knew they screwed up as soon as they clicked on the pop-up. They call me and I fix it up quickly. I've also been not so lucky...having clients wait a week before finally noticing something's not right.

Seriously though. When confronted with a pop-up such as in my example below, what choice would most users have? Using simple javascript, it could be made to mimic whichever OS it was running on, and even appear in a modal way, not allowing access to the site behind it until Ok is pressed.

post-107175-1222286740.jpg

Of course you or I could prevent it, but we can't always be there to prevent the typical end user from clicking what shouldn't have been clicked.

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!