63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

Now I might be the exception here, but I honestly haven't even seen a pop-up like the ones posted here on my machines in _years_.

With that said, I always keep my anti-virus up to date, use FireFox with the adblock plus extension, and never use pirated software. I think the last part of that equation is the most significant as many "hacks or cracks" have been found to include some sort of malware, whether a trojan or spyware.

Many types of malware are spread via peer to peer sharing methods, and since I am not a user of any, it seems that I don't have these problems.

It is pretty simple to keep a machine clean:

1. Always keep your Java and Adobe Flash/Shockwave up to date.

2. Keep your anti-virus software up to date, but more importantly, free solutions are free for a reason. They are not nearly as comprehensive as a good paid solution, no matter which solution you choose to use.

3. Don't use pirated software. The use of "cracks and hacks" are just asking for trouble. You don't know how things were cracked, or what might have been piggy backed on to an exe file.

Simply following those three tips, and you can be fairly certain that you are safe from malware.

well in my opinion if you have a 'quality' popup blocker (i.e. AD-Muncher, www.admuncher.com ) then it's fairly rare if you will get any popups and it even removes a fairly high percentage of adverts on websites to and it's light on resources to AND works with all browsers etc.

only problem is ad-muncher aint free but it's well worth the money... it block's just about everything... but if you cant afford that just get a free add-on for Firefox browser called 'adblock plus' which will probably remove alot of random popups to.

in general between adblock plus and ad-muncher i pretty much get close to ZERO popup's... and even adverts (advertisments etc) are kept to a minimum.

Now I might be the exception here, but I honestly haven't even seen a pop-up like the ones posted here on my machines in _years_.

Simply following those three tips, and you can be fairly certain that you are safe from malware.

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

I think truly automatic updates would be great. Not how it is now where users still have to do some sort of clicking. Although, that goes back to my point: users need to READ. Countless times I have witnessed users ignorantly close a window asking them to update because they "don't have the time" or "don't know what it means". It's a freakin update! Install it! This attitude needs to change. Everyone is capable of having a stable system if they follow simple logical rules. Update your system, don't go to BS sites, and pay attention. This day in age there aren't many pop-ups as there were in previous years. The pop-ups most people see are caused by Spyware installed on their system and they are generated from their PC.

OK, you still aren't making sense to me :p

I know it's promoting a product (FoxyTunes), but it's also providing a useful feature, so I don't get what you're on about.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

usefull in what way? like we care what you are listening to while browsing a forum non music related

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

That is one nice thing about firefox. How it automatically updates itself and the extensions you are using.

Why are we arguing about two lines of text in this dudes sig? I've seen tons of similar ones on neowin, grow up and stay on topic.

BTW, I love the irony in your sig :

My movie forum (dutch)

My website

It in his posts, which means it gets copied when you quote.

I have sigs off for a reason. I don't want to see them. I don't begrudge those who want to see them (and, in fact, provide one of my own for others to read, if they like the sig thing). Attaching a sig in the post defeats the purpose of sigs.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

It in his posts, which means it gets copied when you quote.

I have sigs off for a reason. I don't want to see them. I don't begrudge those who want to see them (and, in fact, provide one of my own for others to read, if they like the sig thing). Attaching a sig in the post defeats the purpose of sigs.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

ah didn't realize it was attached to the posts :blush:

Look on the bright side... it keeps a lot of us here on Neowin making money to remove that crap! Thank God for inept users.

Yep.

However, its putting the stress on us technicians because we (or atleast I) am seeing those more and more everyday - and I'm tired of it!

Yep.

However, its putting the stress on us technicians because we (or atleast I) am seeing those more and more everyday - and I'm tired of it!

I know where you are coming from. yes I make money from it, but i'm also getting burned out.

Some might say "Well thats because you're formatting over every malware infection".

If I had to do a 3 hour malware removal for each malware infested computer I wouldn't be burned out, i'd be POSTAL!.

I know where you are coming from. yes I make money from it, but i'm also getting burned out.

Some might say "Well thats because you're formatting over every malware infection".

If I had to do a 3 hour malware removal for each malware infested computer I wouldn't be burned out, i'd be POSTAL!.

Yeah removing all that malware takes more time than a format most of the time, especially with an.d infections. sadly most users are dumb and never make any backups so it's not always an option.

Yeah removing all that malware takes more time than a format most of the time, especially with an.d infections. sadly most users are dumb and never make any backups so it's not always an option.

I carry an external hard drive with me, so I back up all that they want backed up before I format. so that isn't much of a problem. The only problem I forsee is that most people are to stupid to know the definition of a format. They are to stupid after pounding on them on the concept that when you get down there will be nothing left. So much so that they ask, ok but willl "Such and such still be there?" At that point you just want to slap your forehead!.

In the end I usually grab a peice of paper that has some kind of print on it. I say see this paper??. This is your computer now!. then I flip it over. I then say this is what your computer will look like when im done!. Of course now the blank side of paper is up!.

I will agree with you that 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of my customers have no backup of anything!

Edited by warwagon
Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

Don't talk crap! Just because someone is on an Apple machine does not mean they're are immune from clicking on a dialogue box that tells them they have won $15,000 or have 15,000 viruses. A stupid user is a stupid user regardless of the Operating System and if you think that the platform is at all safe because it only has a handful of viruses and wont get targeted as it's user base increases then you are severely wrong.

Simply moving users onto whatever platform is least targeted is not a solution to the problem its a temporary measure. Educating users or forcing them to actually read a dialogue / more effective warnings such as "This prompt has been triggered by the website" are more effective starts.

whoever clicks on those ads are complete idots.
just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

Agree on both. I can't comprehend how people actually fall for these.

Don't talk crap! Just because someone is on an Apple machine does not mean they're are immune from clicking on a dialogue box that tells them they have won $15,000 or have 15,000 viruses. A stupid user is a stupid user regardless of the Operating System and if you think that the platform is at all safe because it only has a handful of viruses and wont get targeted as it's user base increases then you are severely wrong.

Simply moving users onto whatever platform is least targeted is not a solution to the problem its a temporary measure. Educating users or forcing them to actually read a dialogue / more effective warnings such as "This prompt has been triggered by the website" are more effective starts.

Yo. Unplugged. Read my post.

You will find it pretty much says what you just re-stated.

Apple is currently a platform that is not targetted, so bad users are relatively safe from malware. No crap. Just a fact. And, someday, Apple may become a more common target. It just hasn't happened yet.

I don't agree that education is the most effective method of malware control. It would be securing the system and having users (especially ones prone to just clicking boxes) run only as users - no admin privileges.

"talking crap", indeed! :laugh:

Crazy percentage. And yet I can believe it.

I watched my boss at my last place of work try to close a flashing AD BANNER (not pop up) that was modeled to look like an XP dialogue box. He clicked the X and then closed the following pop up ad, and then he clicked the X again, and closed the pop up again, and then he did it a third time before I took the friggin mouse from him!

  • 1 year later...

those people most likely using outdated program

both IE and Firefox block popups by default since some time ago

Crazy percentage. And yet I can believe it.

I watched my boss at my last place of work try to close a flashing AD BANNER (not pop up) that was modeled to look like an XP dialogue box. He clicked the X and then closed the following pop up ad, and then he clicked the X again, and closed the pop up again, and then he did it a third time before I took the friggin mouse from him!

:rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!