63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

_45047901_popup226body.jpg

Internet users are unable to distinguish between genuine pop-up warnings messages and false ones, a study at North Carolina State University has found.

The study examined the responses of undergraduates to messages which popped up while they did other tasks on a PC.

Seeing the pop-ups as a mere annoyance the majority clicked 'OK'.

Fake pop-ups are a well-known vehicle for cyber-criminals to install harmful software on PCs.

"This study demonstrates how easy it is to fool people on the web," said co-author Michael Wogalter, professor of psychology at North Carolina State University.

"Be suspicious when things pop up. Don't click OK - close the box instead," said Dr Wogalter."

Legitimate message

Participants were fooled by the fake messages 63% of the time, even when warned that some of what they would be seeing would be false.

It suggests that the wording on genuine messages needs to be rethought, said Dr Wogalter.

"I don't know if you could develop a legitimate message that could not be duplicated and used illegitimately," he said.

Tony Neate, managing director of the UK's Get Safe Online campaign advised users to install a pop-up blocker.

"Browsers and most anti-virus software offers them. Pop-ups are either downloading something malicious or trying to sell me something so I just don't want them there at all," he said.

Source: BBC News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/673478-63-users-fail-to-spot-fake-pop-ups/
Share on other sites

Have to say I agree with this. I can't tell you how many calls I get from people saying that a message popped up telling them that they had 1,500 viruses on their computer. Meanwhile, their virus scanner subscription expired a few years ago.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Most of them have the XP Style if the user is a vista user then they might relise it is fake as your not really going to get an XP Style popup on a vista aero theme.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

Edited by lord_xenos

^^ Man that's just a bit OTT

As an experienced computer user these things stick out like a sore thumb, but with 63% of people clicking them by mistake kinda suggests that it's a common problem and not just a error of judgement.

It really is easy to fall for, unless you know how windows displays every single error message and that it won't be apart of the IE shell.

I find popup blockers out of date now in my opinion, it's time web browsers block these URL's by default. If sites like zedo.com want to be intrusive with Javascript then why should we allow it in the first place. Google doesn't do it with their advertisements, why should they?

If someone on the street came up to you saying "BUY THIS, BUY THIS" and started jumping up and down around you then something would be done about it. It should be the same with the Internet.

I can easily tell the difference between a popup and a legit message lol. Because most of them look more and more real I can see why people click them, but if your cursor changes while you are anywhere on the box don't click :| lol.

My mum used to fall for these :laugh:

Can someone actually tell me, are these kind of popups completely legal?

Some of them are pretty damn deceiving (fake virus scans that actually look like a running application, ect).

...

It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

...

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

i think you mean the oppisite, i would consider myself an end user, and i never read browser popups, because i dont get any, and if i do, i never click, i usally put my mouse over it though to see if its all flash, because flash ads = 100% crapware aomost always.

Theres hardly any legitimate posts, unless im on a forum or so,and think its maybe a new message, i dont click.

Source: BBC News

Most annoying popup's to me aren't these fake ones. but the ones where they have a fake X I hit the X to get rid of the window and off it goes to the site. Try to use Opera just for those, but even Opera can't fix all of those.

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

Call it what you want, be it ignorance, stupidity, uninformed, or inexperienced. It all results in infections on the user's PC. Yes I said PC. I know Macs are less likely to be targeted for the reasons you already stated. I've met many people from both sides of the spectrum. Some have enough common sense to decipher a false pop-up, others aren't so fortunate and constantly go to the wrong sites, and click the wrong things. I do call it ignorance when a user does not pursue knowledge of what they are actually doing and what they can do to prevent what they know happens to "inexperienced" users (ie. infections). As a user of a PC and being on the Internet, I believe it is a responsibility this day in age to be informed.

Edited by lord_xenos
lol @ the Antivirus 2009 popup

clicking that makes for a fun time trying to get it off afterwards

Very true. The trick is to catch it as soon as it happens. I've been lucky a few times when the user knew they screwed up as soon as they clicked on the pop-up. They call me and I fix it up quickly. I've also been not so lucky...having clients wait a week before finally noticing something's not right.

Seriously though. When confronted with a pop-up such as in my example below, what choice would most users have? Using simple javascript, it could be made to mimic whichever OS it was running on, and even appear in a modal way, not allowing access to the site behind it until Ok is pressed.

post-107175-1222286740.jpg

Of course you or I could prevent it, but we can't always be there to prevent the typical end user from clicking what shouldn't have been clicked.

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!