63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

_45047901_popup226body.jpg

Internet users are unable to distinguish between genuine pop-up warnings messages and false ones, a study at North Carolina State University has found.

The study examined the responses of undergraduates to messages which popped up while they did other tasks on a PC.

Seeing the pop-ups as a mere annoyance the majority clicked 'OK'.

Fake pop-ups are a well-known vehicle for cyber-criminals to install harmful software on PCs.

"This study demonstrates how easy it is to fool people on the web," said co-author Michael Wogalter, professor of psychology at North Carolina State University.

"Be suspicious when things pop up. Don't click OK - close the box instead," said Dr Wogalter."

Legitimate message

Participants were fooled by the fake messages 63% of the time, even when warned that some of what they would be seeing would be false.

It suggests that the wording on genuine messages needs to be rethought, said Dr Wogalter.

"I don't know if you could develop a legitimate message that could not be duplicated and used illegitimately," he said.

Tony Neate, managing director of the UK's Get Safe Online campaign advised users to install a pop-up blocker.

"Browsers and most anti-virus software offers them. Pop-ups are either downloading something malicious or trying to sell me something so I just don't want them there at all," he said.

Source: BBC News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/673478-63-users-fail-to-spot-fake-pop-ups/
Share on other sites

Have to say I agree with this. I can't tell you how many calls I get from people saying that a message popped up telling them that they had 1,500 viruses on their computer. Meanwhile, their virus scanner subscription expired a few years ago.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Most of them have the XP Style if the user is a vista user then they might relise it is fake as your not really going to get an XP Style popup on a vista aero theme.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

Edited by lord_xenos

^^ Man that's just a bit OTT

As an experienced computer user these things stick out like a sore thumb, but with 63% of people clicking them by mistake kinda suggests that it's a common problem and not just a error of judgement.

It really is easy to fall for, unless you know how windows displays every single error message and that it won't be apart of the IE shell.

I find popup blockers out of date now in my opinion, it's time web browsers block these URL's by default. If sites like zedo.com want to be intrusive with Javascript then why should we allow it in the first place. Google doesn't do it with their advertisements, why should they?

If someone on the street came up to you saying "BUY THIS, BUY THIS" and started jumping up and down around you then something would be done about it. It should be the same with the Internet.

I can easily tell the difference between a popup and a legit message lol. Because most of them look more and more real I can see why people click them, but if your cursor changes while you are anywhere on the box don't click :| lol.

My mum used to fall for these :laugh:

Can someone actually tell me, are these kind of popups completely legal?

Some of them are pretty damn deceiving (fake virus scans that actually look like a running application, ect).

...

It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

...

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

Not always true. Many pop-ups are ads prompted by the site you are visiting and use the GUI of your OS to display itself, so many pop-ups would look just the same as any window in Vista and XP.

i think you mean the oppisite, i would consider myself an end user, and i never read browser popups, because i dont get any, and if i do, i never click, i usally put my mouse over it though to see if its all flash, because flash ads = 100% crapware aomost always.

Theres hardly any legitimate posts, unless im on a forum or so,and think its maybe a new message, i dont click.

Source: BBC News

Most annoying popup's to me aren't these fake ones. but the ones where they have a fake X I hit the X to get rid of the window and off it goes to the site. Try to use Opera just for those, but even Opera can't fix all of those.

Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

Call it what you want, be it ignorance, stupidity, uninformed, or inexperienced. It all results in infections on the user's PC. Yes I said PC. I know Macs are less likely to be targeted for the reasons you already stated. I've met many people from both sides of the spectrum. Some have enough common sense to decipher a false pop-up, others aren't so fortunate and constantly go to the wrong sites, and click the wrong things. I do call it ignorance when a user does not pursue knowledge of what they are actually doing and what they can do to prevent what they know happens to "inexperienced" users (ie. infections). As a user of a PC and being on the Internet, I believe it is a responsibility this day in age to be informed.

Edited by lord_xenos
lol @ the Antivirus 2009 popup

clicking that makes for a fun time trying to get it off afterwards

Very true. The trick is to catch it as soon as it happens. I've been lucky a few times when the user knew they screwed up as soon as they clicked on the pop-up. They call me and I fix it up quickly. I've also been not so lucky...having clients wait a week before finally noticing something's not right.

Seriously though. When confronted with a pop-up such as in my example below, what choice would most users have? Using simple javascript, it could be made to mimic whichever OS it was running on, and even appear in a modal way, not allowing access to the site behind it until Ok is pressed.

post-107175-1222286740.jpg

Of course you or I could prevent it, but we can't always be there to prevent the typical end user from clicking what shouldn't have been clicked.

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!