63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

Why? Money.

Isn't that just all "reactive"?

New threat pops up. Enough reports and analysis come in on new possible threat. Threat is confirmed. Blacklist updated. Repeat for every new variation of threat and new web site hosting it (heaven forbid it is submitted as a rotating advert).

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

ISPs do not need to be any more involved than they are right now. Their sole purpose is feed the information that is the internet through the proper channels uninhibited. You count on Microsoft to create a worthy product to do this? URL filtering would certainly not be as proactive as you are hoping, it is strictly reactive to what is already an issue. As part of an IT team I can assure you that I/we go to many lengths to prevent infections. You cannot, however, exclude end user error from the equation. Like I said, I truly believe as internet users everyone needs to be informed and not ignorant to what creeps throughout the internet.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

QFT

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

What are these "pop-ups" people speak of? Honestly, I haven't seen pop-ups for years.

NEway, that many people not knowing whether a pop-up is fake or not is no surprise at all. I recently had to help someone because they couldn't figure out how to set Google back to being their homepage after MSN/Live had managed to take it over.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I wouldn't say they are stupid. They just lack common sense. I know quite a few brilliant people who are common sense dumb.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

I wouldn't say some users are too 'ignorant' to learn about computers or learn about these things, it's just they aren't aware of the dangers so they don't know they need to learn these things. Most inexperienced computer users will think they are using their PC perfectly fine & know all they think they need to know (chatting on MSN, browsing the web).

They need to be taught both in school & in life in general the importance of computer security & the dangers of things like this on the internet. ICT should be compulsory throughout the whole of education & they should teach students these sort of things.

It is extremely easy to understand a fake pop-up & know it is fake when you have a good knowledge of computers & technology.

I think I actually agree with this :p lol.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

So it's then end of the world that a WINDOWS OS had a tiny error ?

Get worried if you do that 3-4 times and stops every single time.Jesus...are you going to pull a lawsuit on Microsoft now ?

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

OK, you still aren't making sense to me :p

I know it's promoting a product (FoxyTunes), but it's also providing a useful feature, so I don't get what you're on about.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

I've come to learn C++ is as arrogant as they come, and I generally don't bother with him anymore. You are quite right though.

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

This is exactly my point. We are capable of deciphering what is legitimate and what is fraudulent. Not because we have a superior IQ or because it may be part of our career path (although that may help). I think anyone who takes the time and effort to actually read what is in front of their face and use some logic could find that these messages are at the very least suspicious.

I remember back before I was a even a teenager I recieved my first popup. First thing I did was call my mom...

"MOM! MOM! WE WON A FREE CRUISE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO SIGN UP FOR IT IN THE NEXT TEN MINUTES OR ELSE SOMEONE ELSE WILL GET IT!!! HURRY! COME HOME!!!"

We didn't get the cruise :(

Edited by Ruiz
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The entire world moved to the vastly superior and now universally supported Dolby Atmos technology a very long time ago, mate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!