63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

Why? Money.

Isn't that just all "reactive"?

New threat pops up. Enough reports and analysis come in on new possible threat. Threat is confirmed. Blacklist updated. Repeat for every new variation of threat and new web site hosting it (heaven forbid it is submitted as a rotating advert).

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

ISPs do not need to be any more involved than they are right now. Their sole purpose is feed the information that is the internet through the proper channels uninhibited. You count on Microsoft to create a worthy product to do this? URL filtering would certainly not be as proactive as you are hoping, it is strictly reactive to what is already an issue. As part of an IT team I can assure you that I/we go to many lengths to prevent infections. You cannot, however, exclude end user error from the equation. Like I said, I truly believe as internet users everyone needs to be informed and not ignorant to what creeps throughout the internet.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

QFT

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

What are these "pop-ups" people speak of? Honestly, I haven't seen pop-ups for years.

NEway, that many people not knowing whether a pop-up is fake or not is no surprise at all. I recently had to help someone because they couldn't figure out how to set Google back to being their homepage after MSN/Live had managed to take it over.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I wouldn't say they are stupid. They just lack common sense. I know quite a few brilliant people who are common sense dumb.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

I wouldn't say some users are too 'ignorant' to learn about computers or learn about these things, it's just they aren't aware of the dangers so they don't know they need to learn these things. Most inexperienced computer users will think they are using their PC perfectly fine & know all they think they need to know (chatting on MSN, browsing the web).

They need to be taught both in school & in life in general the importance of computer security & the dangers of things like this on the internet. ICT should be compulsory throughout the whole of education & they should teach students these sort of things.

It is extremely easy to understand a fake pop-up & know it is fake when you have a good knowledge of computers & technology.

I think I actually agree with this :p lol.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

So it's then end of the world that a WINDOWS OS had a tiny error ?

Get worried if you do that 3-4 times and stops every single time.Jesus...are you going to pull a lawsuit on Microsoft now ?

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

OK, you still aren't making sense to me :p

I know it's promoting a product (FoxyTunes), but it's also providing a useful feature, so I don't get what you're on about.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

I've come to learn C++ is as arrogant as they come, and I generally don't bother with him anymore. You are quite right though.

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

This is exactly my point. We are capable of deciphering what is legitimate and what is fraudulent. Not because we have a superior IQ or because it may be part of our career path (although that may help). I think anyone who takes the time and effort to actually read what is in front of their face and use some logic could find that these messages are at the very least suspicious.

I remember back before I was a even a teenager I recieved my first popup. First thing I did was call my mom...

"MOM! MOM! WE WON A FREE CRUISE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO SIGN UP FOR IT IN THE NEXT TEN MINUTES OR ELSE SOMEONE ELSE WILL GET IT!!! HURRY! COME HOME!!!"

We didn't get the cruise :(

Edited by Ruiz
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!