63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

Why? Money.

Isn't that just all "reactive"?

New threat pops up. Enough reports and analysis come in on new possible threat. Threat is confirmed. Blacklist updated. Repeat for every new variation of threat and new web site hosting it (heaven forbid it is submitted as a rotating advert).

That makes you point a finger at somebody else! Why are ISP's not looking at ways to cut off these websites? Why doesn't Microsoft implement such a thing to Windows Defender, why doesn't I.T repair guys do a proper job instead of just cleaning.

I just believe that a good 70% of infections could be prevented by URL filtering.

Why isn't something being done? Money.

ISPs do not need to be any more involved than they are right now. Their sole purpose is feed the information that is the internet through the proper channels uninhibited. You count on Microsoft to create a worthy product to do this? URL filtering would certainly not be as proactive as you are hoping, it is strictly reactive to what is already an issue. As part of an IT team I can assure you that I/we go to many lengths to prevent infections. You cannot, however, exclude end user error from the equation. Like I said, I truly believe as internet users everyone needs to be informed and not ignorant to what creeps throughout the internet.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

QFT

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

What are these "pop-ups" people speak of? Honestly, I haven't seen pop-ups for years.

NEway, that many people not knowing whether a pop-up is fake or not is no surprise at all. I recently had to help someone because they couldn't figure out how to set Google back to being their homepage after MSN/Live had managed to take it over.

I love all the nerd rage... "ONLY IDIOTS CLICK THESE POPUPS!!!" Yea... Idiots who are doctors, lawyers, accountants, or otherwise smarter than you, but have simply dedicated their lives to something other than computers.

I am surprised it's down to 63% now. I would have expected it to still be more. The novices do actually seem to be learning, at a rate that is alarming to me as someone who relies on offering support in this field for bread and butter.

I wouldn't say they are stupid. They just lack common sense. I know quite a few brilliant people who are common sense dumb.

It's stupid ignorance of end users that causes this. People need to take the two seconds to actually read what is in front of their face instead of clicking the "X" or "OK". It's true, countless infections are caused by the end user being too ignorant to use a computer. It's quite sad.

I wouldn't say some users are too 'ignorant' to learn about computers or learn about these things, it's just they aren't aware of the dangers so they don't know they need to learn these things. Most inexperienced computer users will think they are using their PC perfectly fine & know all they think they need to know (chatting on MSN, browsing the web).

They need to be taught both in school & in life in general the importance of computer security & the dangers of things like this on the internet. ICT should be compulsory throughout the whole of education & they should teach students these sort of things.

It is extremely easy to understand a fake pop-up & know it is fake when you have a good knowledge of computers & technology.

I think I actually agree with this :p lol.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

So it's then end of the world that a WINDOWS OS had a tiny error ?

Get worried if you do that 3-4 times and stops every single time.Jesus...are you going to pull a lawsuit on Microsoft now ?

Just to point out, your comment is one line. Your "fake sig" is three.

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

Please explain to me how it is a "fake sig" when it isn't even meant to be a signature. It is a piece off text (with links I cannot help) automatically inserted into my posts by my Firefox extension FoxyTunes, just to let everybody know what I am currently listening to in iTunes (similar to the "What I'm listening to" thread on this forum).

It is very handy & I could turn it off if I wanted to, but I don't want to.

How is it spam? How is it a "fake sig" & how is it anything to do with fake pop-ups or this thread?

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

No problem.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

OK, you still aren't making sense to me :p

I know it's promoting a product (FoxyTunes), but it's also providing a useful feature, so I don't get what you're on about.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

I've come to learn C++ is as arrogant as they come, and I generally don't bother with him anymore. You are quite right though.

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

Well, the first one should trigger no further action on the part of the user; the second shouldn't be trusted if the user doesn't recognise / didn't install the software; the third could only be trigger by something already installed, so it's already too late. Obviously they all look quite genuine but it's in context that they are easy to spot out. The most serious is the second one, as I've seen plenty of malware that pretends to remove viruses / spyware - people assume it was already installed or is part of Windows and I know people that this has happened to (heck, I know someone that fell for the "I love you" virus).

This is exactly my point. We are capable of deciphering what is legitimate and what is fraudulent. Not because we have a superior IQ or because it may be part of our career path (although that may help). I think anyone who takes the time and effort to actually read what is in front of their face and use some logic could find that these messages are at the very least suspicious.

I remember back before I was a even a teenager I recieved my first popup. First thing I did was call my mom...

"MOM! MOM! WE WON A FREE CRUISE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO SIGN UP FOR IT IN THE NEXT TEN MINUTES OR ELSE SOMEONE ELSE WILL GET IT!!! HURRY! COME HOME!!!"

We didn't get the cruise :(

Edited by Ruiz
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!