63% users fail to spot fake pop-ups


Recommended Posts

Now I might be the exception here, but I honestly haven't even seen a pop-up like the ones posted here on my machines in _years_.

With that said, I always keep my anti-virus up to date, use FireFox with the adblock plus extension, and never use pirated software. I think the last part of that equation is the most significant as many "hacks or cracks" have been found to include some sort of malware, whether a trojan or spyware.

Many types of malware are spread via peer to peer sharing methods, and since I am not a user of any, it seems that I don't have these problems.

It is pretty simple to keep a machine clean:

1. Always keep your Java and Adobe Flash/Shockwave up to date.

2. Keep your anti-virus software up to date, but more importantly, free solutions are free for a reason. They are not nearly as comprehensive as a good paid solution, no matter which solution you choose to use.

3. Don't use pirated software. The use of "cracks and hacks" are just asking for trouble. You don't know how things were cracked, or what might have been piggy backed on to an exe file.

Simply following those three tips, and you can be fairly certain that you are safe from malware.

well in my opinion if you have a 'quality' popup blocker (i.e. AD-Muncher, www.admuncher.com ) then it's fairly rare if you will get any popups and it even removes a fairly high percentage of adverts on websites to and it's light on resources to AND works with all browsers etc.

only problem is ad-muncher aint free but it's well worth the money... it block's just about everything... but if you cant afford that just get a free add-on for Firefox browser called 'adblock plus' which will probably remove alot of random popups to.

in general between adblock plus and ad-muncher i pretty much get close to ZERO popup's... and even adverts (advertisments etc) are kept to a minimum.

Now I might be the exception here, but I honestly haven't even seen a pop-up like the ones posted here on my machines in _years_.

Simply following those three tips, and you can be fairly certain that you are safe from malware.

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

I think truly automatic updates would be great. Not how it is now where users still have to do some sort of clicking. Although, that goes back to my point: users need to READ. Countless times I have witnessed users ignorantly close a window asking them to update because they "don't have the time" or "don't know what it means". It's a freakin update! Install it! This attitude needs to change. Everyone is capable of having a stable system if they follow simple logical rules. Update your system, don't go to BS sites, and pay attention. This day in age there aren't many pop-ups as there were in previous years. The pop-ups most people see are caused by Spyware installed on their system and they are generated from their PC.

OK, you still aren't making sense to me :p

I know it's promoting a product (FoxyTunes), but it's also providing a useful feature, so I don't get what you're on about.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: The Killers - Human

via FoxyTunes

usefull in what way? like we care what you are listening to while browsing a forum non music related

the problem is, for the general user, "it just works". if it's not broken, don't fix it.

they think their computer is perfectly fine and safe. even if they wanted to update, they wouldn't know how. what needs to happen is for things like windows (at least the "home" version) and browsers to automatically update themselves without user interaction

BUT, then the tech community starts complaining about it "phoning home" and unwanted updates being installed without consent.

my view is, we are tech savy. we can easily disable those automatic update features. there are WAY more home users than tech people, so we need to go for the greater good in this case and just have everything automatically update while we take 30 seconds to disable the feature

not only does it make it safer for them but ALSO safer for us; as hackers many less zombie pc's to launch attacks from. and since we are the people who deal with those zombie pc's, it's a win win :)

That is one nice thing about firefox. How it automatically updates itself and the extensions you are using.

Why are we arguing about two lines of text in this dudes sig? I've seen tons of similar ones on neowin, grow up and stay on topic.

BTW, I love the irony in your sig :

My movie forum (dutch)

My website

It in his posts, which means it gets copied when you quote.

I have sigs off for a reason. I don't want to see them. I don't begrudge those who want to see them (and, in fact, provide one of my own for others to read, if they like the sig thing). Attaching a sig in the post defeats the purpose of sigs.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

It in his posts, which means it gets copied when you quote.

I have sigs off for a reason. I don't want to see them. I don't begrudge those who want to see them (and, in fact, provide one of my own for others to read, if they like the sig thing). Attaching a sig in the post defeats the purpose of sigs.

----------------

Now playing on iTunes: Ubuntu Rhapsody - Canonical

via My spam link

ah didn't realize it was attached to the posts :blush:

Look on the bright side... it keeps a lot of us here on Neowin making money to remove that crap! Thank God for inept users.

Yep.

However, its putting the stress on us technicians because we (or atleast I) am seeing those more and more everyday - and I'm tired of it!

Yep.

However, its putting the stress on us technicians because we (or atleast I) am seeing those more and more everyday - and I'm tired of it!

I know where you are coming from. yes I make money from it, but i'm also getting burned out.

Some might say "Well thats because you're formatting over every malware infection".

If I had to do a 3 hour malware removal for each malware infested computer I wouldn't be burned out, i'd be POSTAL!.

I know where you are coming from. yes I make money from it, but i'm also getting burned out.

Some might say "Well thats because you're formatting over every malware infection".

If I had to do a 3 hour malware removal for each malware infested computer I wouldn't be burned out, i'd be POSTAL!.

Yeah removing all that malware takes more time than a format most of the time, especially with an.d infections. sadly most users are dumb and never make any backups so it's not always an option.

Yeah removing all that malware takes more time than a format most of the time, especially with an.d infections. sadly most users are dumb and never make any backups so it's not always an option.

I carry an external hard drive with me, so I back up all that they want backed up before I format. so that isn't much of a problem. The only problem I forsee is that most people are to stupid to know the definition of a format. They are to stupid after pounding on them on the concept that when you get down there will be nothing left. So much so that they ask, ok but willl "Such and such still be there?" At that point you just want to slap your forehead!.

In the end I usually grab a peice of paper that has some kind of print on it. I say see this paper??. This is your computer now!. then I flip it over. I then say this is what your computer will look like when im done!. Of course now the blank side of paper is up!.

I will agree with you that 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of my customers have no backup of anything!

Edited by warwagon
Let me clarify that statement a bit. "to use a Windows computer".

Until such a time that Apple takes a significant enough share to warrant these spoofed popup assaults on naivete, it is a relatively safe computing platform for those who tend to be inexperienced (I prefer that over the term "ignorant" ) with computers in general.

If the up-front cost of buying an Apple computer is daunting or prohibitive, a knowledgeable family member can set up their inexperienced relative or friend with a handy limited user account, and withhold the admin password. This, obviously, has to be done with the computer user's permission (one does not have the right to essentially take over someone else's PC without their permission and understanding).

But those are examples of the types of steps needed to protect people from themselves.

Don't talk crap! Just because someone is on an Apple machine does not mean they're are immune from clicking on a dialogue box that tells them they have won $15,000 or have 15,000 viruses. A stupid user is a stupid user regardless of the Operating System and if you think that the platform is at all safe because it only has a handful of viruses and wont get targeted as it's user base increases then you are severely wrong.

Simply moving users onto whatever platform is least targeted is not a solution to the problem its a temporary measure. Educating users or forcing them to actually read a dialogue / more effective warnings such as "This prompt has been triggered by the website" are more effective starts.

whoever clicks on those ads are complete idots.
just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they are smart. what you know has nothing to do with your "smartness". it's your ability to comprehend new ideas that defines your intelligence (IQ)

i know a lawyer and it's sad to say but, she's not smart. she memorizes laws extremely well (things anyone can learn from a book), but she can't solve puzzles worth crap. i frequently buy physical puzzles (ie two horseshoes chained together end to end with a ring around the middle. how do you get the ring off) and she always fails miserably at them and gives up. she can't think for herself, she can only regurgitate what she's read.

back on topic, if the average homeowner updates their computer to the most recent or 2nd most recent OS (vista and xp, or OS X v10) and updates their browser to the latest (whether it be IE, firefox, opera, etc.) then i think this number would drop by 30%. there's just too many people running outdated software like windows 98. they don't switch because "it just works" but they don't realize that not only do they get screwed, but they screw other people by becoming a zombie PC and a platform for some hacker to launch new trojans remotely

Agree on both. I can't comprehend how people actually fall for these.

Don't talk crap! Just because someone is on an Apple machine does not mean they're are immune from clicking on a dialogue box that tells them they have won $15,000 or have 15,000 viruses. A stupid user is a stupid user regardless of the Operating System and if you think that the platform is at all safe because it only has a handful of viruses and wont get targeted as it's user base increases then you are severely wrong.

Simply moving users onto whatever platform is least targeted is not a solution to the problem its a temporary measure. Educating users or forcing them to actually read a dialogue / more effective warnings such as "This prompt has been triggered by the website" are more effective starts.

Yo. Unplugged. Read my post.

You will find it pretty much says what you just re-stated.

Apple is currently a platform that is not targetted, so bad users are relatively safe from malware. No crap. Just a fact. And, someday, Apple may become a more common target. It just hasn't happened yet.

I don't agree that education is the most effective method of malware control. It would be securing the system and having users (especially ones prone to just clicking boxes) run only as users - no admin privileges.

"talking crap", indeed! :laugh:

Crazy percentage. And yet I can believe it.

I watched my boss at my last place of work try to close a flashing AD BANNER (not pop up) that was modeled to look like an XP dialogue box. He clicked the X and then closed the following pop up ad, and then he clicked the X again, and closed the pop up again, and then he did it a third time before I took the friggin mouse from him!

  • 1 year later...

those people most likely using outdated program

both IE and Firefox block popups by default since some time ago

Crazy percentage. And yet I can believe it.

I watched my boss at my last place of work try to close a flashing AD BANNER (not pop up) that was modeled to look like an XP dialogue box. He clicked the X and then closed the following pop up ad, and then he clicked the X again, and closed the pop up again, and then he did it a third time before I took the friggin mouse from him!

:rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!