[Official] Far Cry 2


Recommended Posts

imo it's a balanced game but it lacks alot of fun things to do and also traveling is hard/annoying not being so open in many places. i also dislike the fact it can take upwards of 6-8 direct body hits to kill a person or sometimes more. Missions are a bit of a pain with the traveling and constant ambushing and stuff to get to and from and finding other ones.

thats my view on it

I bought the game whilst I was at work today in my lunch, now I just had time to install it and it gets to the loading screen on the first mission and bam, crashes to desktop. No error messages or anything :\ Can't find any support ANYWHERE on the net for this, so thought i'd ask you guys ;-D

---- Edit, I've bought a new PC since the one in my sig so its not that ;) Any suggestions?

If you don't like the amount of bullets it takes, just switch to easy.

Anyways, installed the game and played for about 2 hours. I'm 8% in and so far it's just.... "eh." It's an average shooter so far in every sense of the word. Nothing thus far has been overly exciting, and a lot of it is just very tedious (and I hear that's how it stays throughout the entire game). It's not a bad game, though.

The traveling is really annoying IMO... they needed to find more unique things to do in the game to set it apart.

So far I'd give it a 3.5/5, but again, I'm really early in.

Edit: Oh yeah... malaria = lame. Waiting for a mod to remove malaria and degrading guns.

Edited by Ayepecks

it wouldn't even take more than a minute to travel to most missions if it weren't for the random ambushes.

Just got the game an hour or so ago, anyone having problems playing it? I get ill and feel claustrophic after playing for a while. After a bit of searching I found that it was down to a fudge the devs made in order to play in Widescreen and as such the FOV is too low, probably what is making me feel ill :(

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1...75/m/6911036696

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum...pic.php?t=14737

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/42475/Di...-Get-BioShocked

http://www.n4g.com/News-220141.aspx

http://kotaku.com/5067446/far-cry-2s-wides...-all-cropped-up

http://www.examiner.com/r-3067584~Far_Cry_...Far_Cry_2_.html

Other sites are now posting this news too, so why wasn't it mentioned in any of the reviews as its pretty obvious when playing :(

I agree they should have used a wider fov, but most people didn't even notice until these stories, and not these same people are saying this like "I just paid my $50+ dollars for this today. It's going back to the store tomorrow. And developers and publishers wonder why people pirate games."

I'm struggling to understand why this game is getting such great reviews. The repetition is awful (driving through the same goddamn checkpoints at every intersection with the same jeep ramming me from behind), the AI is bad, the story is nonexistent (I thought I was supposed to be looking for this Jackal guy), I have to trample all over the place for 1 piddly diamond at a time, and I spend the vast majority of the game driving through the above frustrations. Plus the previously-mentioned problems with the cease-fire area and the confusing directional sounds.

Hopefully they'll fix these issues in the next game, which would make this a great FPS. But for now, they obviously made a deal with PC Gamer for those wonderful pre-release reviews.

All true.

Only great thing about this are the gfx.

only played it for a bit so far. Runs great and looks awesome on my system. Everything maxed out at 1440x900 with 2x AA with no lag whatsoever. Gameplay wise it seems kinda like an average FPS but i barely started so i can't really say yet.

If you don't like the amount of bullets it takes, just switch to easy.

Anyways, installed the game and played for about 2 hours. I'm 8% in and so far it's just.... "eh." It's an average shooter so far in every sense of the word. Nothing thus far has been overly exciting, and a lot of it is just very tedious (and I hear that's how it stays throughout the entire game). It's not a bad game, though.

The traveling is really annoying IMO... they needed to find more unique things to do in the game to set it apart.

So far I'd give it a 3.5/5, but again, I'm really early in.

Edit: Oh yeah... malaria = lame. Waiting for a mod to remove malaria and degrading guns.

exactly how I felt

only played it for a bit so far. Runs great and looks awesome on my system. Everything maxed out at 1440x900 with 2x AA with no lag whatsoever. Gameplay wise it seems kinda like an average FPS but i barely started so i can't really say yet.

I'm with you here, looks great on my system, runs great no lag, but looking past the gfx this isn't really a great shooter imo. The AI isn't all that intelligent, the character models don't move very fluently very jerky, and just the feel of the shooting system isn't at all great. The immersion and atmosphere is amazing but they should've focused on the mechanics of the shooter.

I want to donate my modified .exe for Far Cry 2 to the neowin community.

I complained to Ubisoft & secuROM about a bug in their "activation" process - they sent me a link to download a modified .exe (4mb) which bypasses the secuROM process -

this is a POSSIBLE noCD patch straight from the source - I need someone to verify though as I am not a cracker.

Just PM me if you want it....

(Before this gets closed from the mods)

:)

Overall, I am just not impressed with this game. The graphics aren't that great and the gameplay is boring. I find the game to be very repetitive with all of the driving around and constantly being bumped into in the same style by enemies. I was expecting much, much more from this game. I am not sure why it has received such great reviews.

boogerjones, not sure why you are complaining so much. In GTA you have to drive everywhere (especially IV) halfway across the map or use taxis, same principle here (just a bus).
In GTA you don't get blindly assaulted by THE EXACT SAME group of guys at every single intersection (including ones that you just took out a minute before).

I'm complaining because it's an awful game and I think this perfectly highlights how disingenuous game reviewers are. And frankly, after dropping $50 on this game, I feel I have the right to bitch about it all I want. Is there any wonder why they didn't offer a demo? It's because they knew gamers would generally be disappointed with it.

Look at the gamer reviews: you'll see the words "boring," "repetitive," and "frustrating" over and over. One guy even said that he felt like he was work all day after playing it for several hours. I enjoy my work, so I'd rather be there than playing Far Cry 2.

i have yet to be blind sited by the same guys and after i shoot them and kill them and if i come back they are not there and if they are they are other guys not the same ones as most reviews stated their is limited variation in bad guys so they make look the same but they are not as once ya shoot some other hear the gun fire and come to see whats up every time i have played up to the 8.75 of game play i have been through sofar each time has been a difference.

as for the graphics they are great so the one guy saying they are crap well he must be playing it eaither on a low end system or purposely playing it on low settings. i have it siad to very high and it looks great the lighting and everything

Been playing for a while longer now and ive found the following irritations:

Vehicle got stuck on a (tiny)bush within minutes of driving. Couldnt free it so had to walk for ages.

Either the weapons have rubber ammunition or the bullets should be kriptonite tipped. 3 shots to the head to take someone down? No thanks

Boring. Played through the tutorial and thats it. I have no desire to drive from place to place meeting grunt after grunt and killing them with my peashooter.

It does look beautiful though, no doubt about it. However I found it to be like Boiling Point. Which is never a good thing. Giving the player too much freedom leaves me with an unclear path and as a result, I stray and get bored. Either going into cease fire zones and shooting the place up for the hell of it or driving around my "buddies" house and killing everyone in sight to test the limits of the system.

I just cant explain it, there is something about this game I don't like. I loved Far Cry and Crysis, but this game just bores me. Like I mentioned previously, if a game wants to focus of realism then let me sneak up on an enemy and silently take him out with a knife in a cease fire area. You cant do that without alerting every enemy within the town. So unless my knife has a siren on the blade or its just badly thought out.

Not to mention I'm still ****ing suffering with the loss of 50% sound which is getting right on my ######. So I won't loose any sleep if I never play this game again. Waste of money though.

In GTA you don't get blindly assaulted by THE EXACT SAME group of guys at every single intersection (including ones that you just took out a minute before).

I'm complaining because it's an awful game and I think this perfectly highlights how disingenuous game reviewers are. And frankly, after dropping $50 on this game, I feel I have the right to bitch about it all I want. Is there any wonder why they didn't offer a demo? It's because they knew gamers would generally be disappointed with it.

Look at the gamer reviews: you'll see the words "boring," "repetitive," and "frustrating" over and over. One guy even said that he felt like he was work all day after playing it for several hours. I enjoy my work, so I'd rather be there than playing Far Cry 2.

Those words are mentioned with the fact that the game is still a lot of fun, graphically pleasing, and has great atmosphere. I can pick out one thing out of a review and blow it out of proportion. Every game has a negative aspect, choosing to ignore all the positives takes away the fun.

Not sure why you seem to be getting assaulted all the time but even if it does happen to you as much as you say it does, why not take the bus like I mentioned?

In GTA you don't get blindly assaulted by THE EXACT SAME group of guys at every single intersection (including ones that you just took out a minute before).

I'm complaining because it's an awful game and I think this perfectly highlights how disingenuous game reviewers are. And frankly, after dropping $50 on this game, I feel I have the right to bitch about it all I want. Is there any wonder why they didn't offer a demo? It's because they knew gamers would generally be disappointed with it.

Look at the gamer reviews: you'll see the words "boring," "repetitive," and "frustrating" over and over. One guy even said that he felt like he was work all day after playing it for several hours. I enjoy my work, so I'd rather be there than playing Far Cry 2.

Yeah even in San Andreas when the gangs attacked you it was not nearly as bad.

Those words are mentioned with the fact that the game is still a lot of fun, graphically pleasing, and has great atmosphere. I can pick out one thing out of a review and blow it out of proportion. Every game has a negative aspect, choosing to ignore all the positives takes away the fun.

Not sure why you seem to be getting assaulted all the time but even if it does happen to you as much as you say it does, why not take the bus like I mentioned?

it's oftena longer drive to the bus than to the objective. And there are still checkpoints along the way...

I like the game but yeah, buses are only useful when you happen to be near them. There aren't enough bus stops.

it's oftena longer drive to the bus than to the objective. And there are still checkpoints along the way...

I like the game but yeah, buses are only useful when you happen to be near them. There aren't enough bus stops.

How? For instance if you do a mission in the main city (where their is a bus terminal), which normally requires you to go to the end of the map, there is a bus for each corner.

If you don't utilize that main bus center in the town, then I can see why people complain.

I think this has to be a new record.

The game has officially locked up on me 15 times within a span of maybe 7 hours. I can put it in DX10 mode, but then it runs like crap because of how unoptimized it is in DX10.

@ Mystic: It's tedious. I utilize every bus center, and the driving is still absolutely mind-numbingly annoying. I've spent more time driving than fighting... in an FPS.

I think this has to be a new record.

The game has officially locked up on me 15 times within a span of maybe 7 hours. I can put it in DX10 mode, but then it runs like crap because of how unoptimized it is in DX10.

@ Mystic: It's tedious. I utilize every bus center, and the driving is still absolutely mind-numbingly annoying. I've spent more time driving than fighting... in an FPS.

what? i get more fps in dx 10 on my 9600gt, and my friend does in his 4870 and benchmarks I have seena nd reviews say it performs better in dx 10. Update to the latest drivers if you haven't that is not normal... the game is optimized for dx 10.

How? For instance if you do a mission in the main city (where their is a bus terminal), which normally requires you to go to the end of the map, there is a bus for each corner.

If you don't utilize that main bus center in the town, then I can see why people complain.

I do use the one in the main town. But for example after you finish your mission you are usually in the middle of the map between a bus stop and town, or the mission is closer to the town than any of the outlying bus stops... idk which game you are playing but you can't use the buses a lot of the time.

Just got the game an hour or so ago, anyone having problems playing it? I get ill and feel claustrophic after playing for a while. After a bit of searching I found that it was down to a fudge the devs made in order to play in Widescreen and as such the FOV is too low, probably what is making me feel ill :(

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1...75/m/6911036696

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum...pic.php?t=14737

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/42475/Di...-Get-BioShocked

http://www.n4g.com/News-220141.aspx

http://kotaku.com/5067446/far-cry-2s-wides...-all-cropped-up

http://www.examiner.com/r-3067584~Far_Cry_...Far_Cry_2_.html

Other sites are now posting this news too, so why wasn't it mentioned in any of the reviews as its pretty obvious when playing :(

Same here. The game makes me dizzy after playing it. Besides that, I really don't get how it got such high reviews. The graphics (at least to me) don't scream GORGEOUS like every reviewer says, maybe it's my setup? (I'm on a 46" Sony Bravia with the 360 connected via component running at 1080p). I thought COD4 looked better.

The gameplay honestly felt like just another generic shooter. The voice acting/speed reading was below-average, the objectives felt like I was just going from one corner of the map to another for no reason (why the hell did they tell me to go to Mike's Bar to get pills only to have the guy there tell me I have to go to a priest all the way across the map to get them?), and the story is flat out uninteresting. KEEP IN MIND THIS IS MY OWN OPINION. Overall, I just didn't really like anything about this game.

Does the game get better later on?

just 2 cents extension from previous post, I'm running all on very high with 2xAA at 1027x768 and it's nice and smooth for me.

5600+ X2 2.8GHz

2GB DDR2-800

HD3870 512MB

Only had one minor lock up but VPU recovery kicked in and was safe besides that been running well. graphically besides time stuff and lighting this games graphics are definitely not up to par with crysis. fire certainly looks crap for very high settings... is it any better with dx10/ultra high ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!