15-Yr Old Faces Child Porn Charges

By neufuse
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Budious

Posted
Posted

I remember not too long ago a case where the individual was charged and found guilty of possession of child pornography. The evidence, several small resolution thumbnails that were preserved in his web browser cache, where has reasonable doubt gone? Did that get tossed out the window? Did Bush take it away when I wasn't looking?

Grand Master

zeta_immersion

Posted
Posted
ha.. didnt even think of that family guy episode where stewie did that... btw its also illegal to take pics of yourself in underwear under 18 too if you go by what they've charged people with in the past

are you kidding me man ... holly **** ... hei dig this the what if and actually true to some extent ...

so you are a small kid eh ,, your parents are happy they have a kid so they take pics of you while taking a bath, it so happens you are 5 or so .. then as you grow up they tease you .. oh look at that lil speckle ... so anyway ... you are mad , take the pic and want to get rid of it, as such on your way to school next day you decide of burning it but ooops, police sees you and wham .. child porn ... But officer i ... iii... save it for the judge criminal Judge Dread is here ... bizatch

*note to self, delete pics of myself in a speedo at 12 years old on a beach with half naked women in europe ... damn i love europe for its nice looking soft, worm beaches

wtf is brooke shields doing in that movie kissing that guy ...

Veteran

megamanXplosion

Posted
Posted

The article mentions nudity but not sexually explicit conduct. Child pornography charges must show that the production of the photos involved a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct or that the visual depiction itself shows such conduct. (US Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, Section 2252.) If no sexually explicit conduct was involved, the child pornography charges won't stick. As far as I know, no laws exist to forbid the photographing of a nude minor in a nonsexual context. (Naturist families can legally take photos of their naturist children, for example.) They might be able to charge her with distributing the photographs to other minors, though.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
15-Year-Old Girl Faces Child Porn Charges for Nude Cell Phone Pictures of Herself

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,434645,00.html

NEWARK, Ohio ? Central Ohio authorities have filed felony charges against a 15-year-old girl accused of taking nude cell phone photos of herself and sending them to high school classmates.

Police say the Newark Licking Valley student was arrested Friday and held over the weekend. On Monday, she entered denials to juvenile charges of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools.

A spokeswoman for the Ohio attorney general's office says an adult convicted of the child pornography charge would have to register as a sexual offender, but a judge would have flexibility on the matter with a convicted juvenile.

A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos.

This same exact thing happened at my Daughter's High School. The girl that did it was the same age, she was not charged with anything. The humiliation she received was enough.

Grand Master

Budious

Posted
Posted
This same exact thing happened at my Daughter's High School. The girl that did it was the same age, she was not charged with anything. The humiliation she received was enough.

I think that's part of the larger issue, these girls are not feeling humiliated by these pictures in most instances, and they leak quite frequently to Internet image boards from the original recipients. It's growing acceptable among the youth culture and becoming more frequent.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
I think that's part of the larger issue, these girls are not feeling humiliated by these pictures in most instances, and they leak quite frequently to Internet image boards from the original recipients. It's growing acceptable among the youth culture and becoming more frequent.

That is exactly what this girl did, posted it on the Net. The one I know.

Grand Master

NienorGT

Posted
Posted

What the hell the states laws have something to do in this?

This should even stay within the family and her, well, probably the school as well.

There is nothing "criminal" in this, it's an underage that take pics of her and send them to other underage kids FFS.

According to this, any underage kids that have sex with other underage kids should be held responsible for underage sex...

Grand Master

_bobcat_ Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I would have thought a talking to about self respect from a responsible adult, while ensuring the photos were deleted by anyone else - would be more than enough.

This is quite ridiculous. I thought those laws were meant to protect children from abuse, how about they go and look for someone who really should be prosecuted for child pornography, or would that be too much like hard work? You know, actually protecting abused and suffering children rather than ruining the life of someone's whose main crime was stupidity..

Mentor

-Vivicidal-

Posted
Posted
I would have thought a talking to about self respect from a responsible adult, while ensuring the photos were deleted by anyone else - would be more than enough.

This is quite ridiculous. I thought those laws were meant to protect children from abuse, how about they go and look for someone who really should be prosecuted for child pornography, or would that be too much like hard work? You know, actually protected abused and suffering children rather than ruining the life of someone's whose main crime was stupidity..

Absolutely. This is absurd!

Community Regular

abulfares

Posted
Posted
A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos.

wha?

you can't even choose to receive or block MMS. If she sent them, how are the students responsible for receiving them? damn it, it is not even April yet.

Community Regular

mollick2

Posted
Posted

This happened at my high school last year. I believe it happened 2 years prior to that too.

Administration normally doesn't catch it though. Last year a dumb freshman took nudes of herself then distributed them herself and blamed someone else for doing it. Obviously she doesn't pay the phone bill, or she would have relized that sending images are one of the things that show up on the bill. She didn't get charged with anything though.

No one has any self respect anymore.

Grand Master

WelshBluebird

Posted
Posted
According to this, any underage kids that have sex with other underage kids should be held responsible for underage sex...

at least in the UK, that is true though.

If you are underage, and have sex with an underage girl, you can get prosecuted for it.

Proficient

Crompee

Posted
Posted
So who gets charged if it's same age, same sex?

Both.

I think in the UK its:

If a underage Male has sexual relations with an underage Female.. the Underage Male (Note: Regardless of age difference, the Male is still charged if they are both underage.)

If a underage Male has sexual relations with an underage Male.. The oldest Male is charged.

If a underage Female has sexual relations with an underage Female.. Who knows, dont think there has been a case yet.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • It's about to become harder to turn off your Samsung TV, thanks to Instagram

      By Aditya Tiwari · Posted

      It's about to become harder to turn off your Samsung TV, thanks to Instagram by Aditya Tiwari Meta announced that its Instagram for TV app has arrived on Samsung TVs in the US as part of its latest expansion, giving users one more way to scroll through Reels. The social media giant often comes under scrutiny for the "addictiveness" of its features, which leads people to spend excessive time on the platform. Interestingly, Instagram boss Adam Mosseri described spending 16 hours on the platform as "problematic use" but not "clinical addiction." Mosseri also compared scrolling on Instagram to binge-watching a show on Netflix. Instagram for TV is now available on Samsung TV models released in 2020 or later. The app is already available on Amazon Fire TV and Google TV in the US, which together account for the majority of connected TV devices. The company said it will test several new features to improve the living room and family experience while using Instagram on the big screen. Watching vertical videos on a big screen isn't something many would be excited about. Probably that's why Meta is testing a dedicated home for horizontal videos. Creators will get the opportunity to design content for TV screens and get more ways to reach audiences, according to Meta. If you found an interesting Reel while doomscrolling on your phone, you'll be able to cast it to your TV. The feature is available for testing on Instagram for TV on Google TV and Amazon Fire TV, and it will also support videos from the Saved tab. Instagram for TV will be testing Channels organized around user interests, across genres such as comedy and sports, as well as content from favorite creators. Moreover, you can watch Stories on your TV. While Instagram is known for short-form videos, it's knocking on more doors to keep the audience hooked. The company said it's exploring new content formats for the big screen, including long-form creator content to cover topics in detail, episodic series to build suspense across multiple episodes, and creator live sessions on TV. All of the new updates put Instagram in competition with established giants like YouTube (and Netflix), which already have a robust presence on the big screen. In recent updates, Instagram added the ability to write an individual caption for each carousel image, manually re-order posts, and a paid version of the app.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By Ready2018 · Posted

      I know RAM and storage prices are high right now, but I think it would have been better to have 1TB as the base level storage, especially as it's supposed to be for gaming. Plus a 2.5gbe ethernet port rather than only 1gbe.
    • Microsoft releases major feature updates for stock Windows 11 apps

      By Neeo · Posted

      I have installed the debloated version of Windows 11 25H2 Pro. I obtained the apps from store.rg-adguard.net. The size of the Photos app window is quite problematic for me; it consistently displays in a 16:9 aspect ratio, resembling a movie theatre screen, and cant remeber its last size and position. The Snipping Tool cannot capture the taskbar. When I select "Window" in capture mode, it allows me to capture menus or individual windows, but I am unable to capture just the taskbar. This functionality was available in version 24! I am on the same version numbers (latesst).
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By RaidenX · Posted

      Think I'll stick to my desktop PC and PS5
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By Jdoe25 · Posted

      I'm already seeing my steam library, still swallowing the 16 Gb of RAM, then looking at the SD storage expansion and saying "what?".

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!