15-Yr Old Faces Child Porn Charges

By neufuse
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Budious

Posted
Posted

I remember not too long ago a case where the individual was charged and found guilty of possession of child pornography. The evidence, several small resolution thumbnails that were preserved in his web browser cache, where has reasonable doubt gone? Did that get tossed out the window? Did Bush take it away when I wasn't looking?

Grand Master

zeta_immersion

Posted
Posted
ha.. didnt even think of that family guy episode where stewie did that... btw its also illegal to take pics of yourself in underwear under 18 too if you go by what they've charged people with in the past

are you kidding me man ... holly **** ... hei dig this the what if and actually true to some extent ...

so you are a small kid eh ,, your parents are happy they have a kid so they take pics of you while taking a bath, it so happens you are 5 or so .. then as you grow up they tease you .. oh look at that lil speckle ... so anyway ... you are mad , take the pic and want to get rid of it, as such on your way to school next day you decide of burning it but ooops, police sees you and wham .. child porn ... But officer i ... iii... save it for the judge criminal Judge Dread is here ... bizatch

*note to self, delete pics of myself in a speedo at 12 years old on a beach with half naked women in europe ... damn i love europe for its nice looking soft, worm beaches

wtf is brooke shields doing in that movie kissing that guy ...

Veteran

megamanXplosion

Posted
Posted

The article mentions nudity but not sexually explicit conduct. Child pornography charges must show that the production of the photos involved a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct or that the visual depiction itself shows such conduct. (US Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, Section 2252.) If no sexually explicit conduct was involved, the child pornography charges won't stick. As far as I know, no laws exist to forbid the photographing of a nude minor in a nonsexual context. (Naturist families can legally take photos of their naturist children, for example.) They might be able to charge her with distributing the photographs to other minors, though.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
15-Year-Old Girl Faces Child Porn Charges for Nude Cell Phone Pictures of Herself

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,434645,00.html

NEWARK, Ohio ? Central Ohio authorities have filed felony charges against a 15-year-old girl accused of taking nude cell phone photos of herself and sending them to high school classmates.

Police say the Newark Licking Valley student was arrested Friday and held over the weekend. On Monday, she entered denials to juvenile charges of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools.

A spokeswoman for the Ohio attorney general's office says an adult convicted of the child pornography charge would have to register as a sexual offender, but a judge would have flexibility on the matter with a convicted juvenile.

A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos.

This same exact thing happened at my Daughter's High School. The girl that did it was the same age, she was not charged with anything. The humiliation she received was enough.

Grand Master

Budious

Posted
Posted
This same exact thing happened at my Daughter's High School. The girl that did it was the same age, she was not charged with anything. The humiliation she received was enough.

I think that's part of the larger issue, these girls are not feeling humiliated by these pictures in most instances, and they leak quite frequently to Internet image boards from the original recipients. It's growing acceptable among the youth culture and becoming more frequent.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
I think that's part of the larger issue, these girls are not feeling humiliated by these pictures in most instances, and they leak quite frequently to Internet image boards from the original recipients. It's growing acceptable among the youth culture and becoming more frequent.

That is exactly what this girl did, posted it on the Net. The one I know.

Grand Master

NienorGT

Posted
Posted

What the hell the states laws have something to do in this?

This should even stay within the family and her, well, probably the school as well.

There is nothing "criminal" in this, it's an underage that take pics of her and send them to other underage kids FFS.

According to this, any underage kids that have sex with other underage kids should be held responsible for underage sex...

Grand Master

_bobcat_ Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I would have thought a talking to about self respect from a responsible adult, while ensuring the photos were deleted by anyone else - would be more than enough.

This is quite ridiculous. I thought those laws were meant to protect children from abuse, how about they go and look for someone who really should be prosecuted for child pornography, or would that be too much like hard work? You know, actually protecting abused and suffering children rather than ruining the life of someone's whose main crime was stupidity..

Mentor

-Vivicidal-

Posted
Posted
I would have thought a talking to about self respect from a responsible adult, while ensuring the photos were deleted by anyone else - would be more than enough.

This is quite ridiculous. I thought those laws were meant to protect children from abuse, how about they go and look for someone who really should be prosecuted for child pornography, or would that be too much like hard work? You know, actually protected abused and suffering children rather than ruining the life of someone's whose main crime was stupidity..

Absolutely. This is absurd!

Community Regular

abulfares

Posted
Posted
A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos.

wha?

you can't even choose to receive or block MMS. If she sent them, how are the students responsible for receiving them? damn it, it is not even April yet.

Community Regular

mollick2

Posted
Posted

This happened at my high school last year. I believe it happened 2 years prior to that too.

Administration normally doesn't catch it though. Last year a dumb freshman took nudes of herself then distributed them herself and blamed someone else for doing it. Obviously she doesn't pay the phone bill, or she would have relized that sending images are one of the things that show up on the bill. She didn't get charged with anything though.

No one has any self respect anymore.

Grand Master

WelshBluebird

Posted
Posted
According to this, any underage kids that have sex with other underage kids should be held responsible for underage sex...

at least in the UK, that is true though.

If you are underage, and have sex with an underage girl, you can get prosecuted for it.

Proficient

Crompee

Posted
Posted
So who gets charged if it's same age, same sex?

Both.

I think in the UK its:

If a underage Male has sexual relations with an underage Female.. the Underage Male (Note: Regardless of age difference, the Male is still charged if they are both underage.)

If a underage Male has sexual relations with an underage Male.. The oldest Male is charged.

If a underage Female has sexual relations with an underage Female.. Who knows, dont think there has been a case yet.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By sagum · Posted

      This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI

      By zikalify · Posted

      Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By sagum · Posted

      A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By noobient · Posted

      Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By Parallax Abstraction · Posted

      They've told outlets who got review units that it isn't. Partially because they believe that contributes to closed ecosystems. GamersNexus also believes this is because Valve's fighting a monopolistic practices lawsuit in Europe right now. They've also never subsidized any of their past hardware efforts and well, they definitely aren't subsidizing the Steam Deck right now.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!