Changes due to feedback on Neowin 5


Recommended Posts

- Added poster info and comment count to main articles and Around the Web

- Increased spacing between articles, so it doesn't look "cramped"

- Added toggle option to increase the width of the site

- Added padding around the articles so they appear less cluttered/tight

- Fixed PM indicator back to red and centered the number (applies only to less than 10 unread PM's)

Edited by Neobond
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/683246-changes-due-to-feedback-on-neowin-5/
Share on other sites

I have issues, not with the redesign, but with so many people moaning about the ads. I'm a subscriber too, but I didn't subscribe to Neowin to get rid of ads, in fact, its not even an option. So why are so many people, Subscribers included moaning about the ads? They help maintain this awesome service that Neobond and co offer, at no additional cost to the end user.

Many websites will pack a design out for max advertisement space, but Neowin maintains a strict policy of control when it comes to ads. If you switch on your ad blocker, you are infact hurting this site's ability to continue and grow and keep providing the level of service which for me, thus far has been brilliant.

I subscribed to Neowin because I want to support it. It's my #1 destination on the internet. I want it to continue as much as possible. All this sensless moaning about ads is just a bit too pedantic.

I have issues, not with the redesign, but with so many people moaning about the ads. I'm a subscriber too, but I didn't subscribe to Neowin to get rid of ads, in fact, its not even an option. So why are so many people, Subscribers included moaning about the ads? They help maintain this awesome service that Neobond and co offer, at no additional cost to the end user.

You're missing the point. No-one is moaning about "the ads". Many of us accept them as a necessary evil. What we're moaning about is the single new ad obtrusively placed slap bang in the middle of the page.

You're missing the point. No-one is moaning about "the ads". Many of us accept them as a necessary evil. What we're moaning about is the single new ad obtrusively placed slap bang in the middle of the page.

That ad in the middle brings in more revenue and allows Neobond to turn off intellitxt on the front page, thus speeding up it's load time.

I have issues, not with the redesign, but with so many people moaning about the ads. I'm a subscriber too, but I didn't subscribe to Neowin to get rid of ads, in fact, its not even an option. So why are so many people, Subscribers included moaning about the ads? They help maintain this awesome service that Neobond and co offer, at no additional cost to the end user.

Many websites will pack a design out for max advertisement space, but Neowin maintains a strict policy of control when it comes to ads. If you switch on your ad blocker, you are infact hurting this site's ability to continue and grow and keep providing the level of service which for me, thus far has been brilliant.

I subscribed to Neowin because I want to support it. It's my #1 destination on the internet. I want it to continue as much as possible. All this sensless moaning about ads is just a bit too pedantic.

Dont like the moaning... dont read the comments. Simple really.

Those who dont like the ad's, which seems to be a majority of people, are bringing up a genuine point about the poor placement of one single ad... so you cant exactly say, 'if you dont like the ads, dont come here', can you.

That ad in the middle brings in more revenue

Or drives new people away from Neowin... take your pick.

Man, I complained a lot about the ad, but since they moved everything else out of the middle (affiliates and such) and left only the ad, I really don't think it's that big of a deal.

Unfortunatly for you, you are just one of a small majority who DONT mind the ad. The larger majority dislike it and feel it is intrusive to the text around it.

Unfortunatly for you, you are just one of a small majority who DONT mind the ad. The larger majority dislike it and feel it is intrusive to the text around it.

Thats hardly the case, its just a few "very vocal" users who are griping about the ad.

Unfortunatly for you, you are just one of a small majority who DONT mind the ad. The larger majority dislike it and feel it is intrusive to the text around it.

The majority of commenters, sure. What about all those who genuinely don't care enough to comment? As for your post 10, don't think you're not being listened to - we wouldn't be having this dialogue if you weren't. We just disagree.

Will the auto refresh of forum posts be re-enabled on the main page? I have asked this at least three times in the main thread but it seems to have gone un-noticed. There was a mention that you want to move away from it because of usability and (I think a joke) that mouse manufacturers will gain more money because of the extra clicks?

When it's on the site, for me at least, is infinitely more usable. Reading the other comments in the main thread it seems to be a feature that is wanted too. I don't want to have to "click" to check each time, nor refresh the whole page, this is a step back imo and was one of the few things on the front page I used a lot. Surely not having it creates more bandwidth as people will be constantly refreshing the whole page rather than just waiting and see new posts?

Just my tuppence worth.

I really like the new design, and can even forgive the ad and the huge amount of redundant space (50%) on 1920x1200 monitor, but please reconsider the autrefresh, or even as I mentioned in the other thread add it back as an option like you did in the last skin.

Autorefresh I disagree with and I'll talk about it here since you ask again.

It's a usability nightmare and as part of my real-life job I researched into industry papers about this kind of thing - if users go click on a link and find it suddenly moves just as they're making the journey to it, it's frustrating - I hate it myself and it's happened a lot before on Neowin.

Secondly, you don't have to refresh the page - just click the little refresh icon on the box itself to load the feeds again.

Thirdly, doing AJAX interaction with Javascript on a timed basis, specifically when the page itself may not even be the active tab, is pretty bad in terms of browser memory usage unless it's a core feature. For something that is a peripheral feature where we have an alternative (one click to refresh just that area) I see it as a bad trade-off.

Fourthly, and though it's not something I necessarily agree with it's something that is a suggestion made to web developers - once the page is loaded it's typically not a good idea to 'phone home' - certain more paranoid users have suggested on a wider industry level that any kind of timed request to the server when the page is by all intents and purposes idle is both unnecessary and not a good use of the browser environment.

As I say, number 4 isn't something I hugely agree upon but I wanted to let you in to my thought process on this feature - it wasn't disabled out of laziness.

Edited by Rob

I would have preferred "that ad" to be in the right hand side where the "around the web" seciton is. Even if there is a whole side of them I wouldn't mind, it's a shame they break the news page, but yes, the inteli text was awful!

However, I am not the owner of the site, make the changes that need to be done to keep Neowin alive and I am sure I will live! :)

I complained about the IntelliTXT links being green as it doesn't fit the whole decor though... Although the forum colours should be updated to match the front page as the blues are different color.

I know IntelliTXT adds a lot of load time but making them blue links would look better. I'm surprised he didn't go with the Amazon ones with the amount of products being talked about here :)

if users go click on a link and find it suddenly moves just as they're making the journey to it, it's frustrating - I hate it myself and it's happened a lot before on Neowin.

I agree that used to irk me. I mean it had it's uses, but a manual refresh seems to get the desired result quicker anyway and it'll mean I don't have links I want to click disapearing. I've lost topics I thought looked interesting because they disapeared just as I went to visit them and sometimes I just don't have the motivation to then go do a search for it.

I agree that used to irk me. I mean it had it's uses, but a manual refresh seems to get the desired result quicker anyway and it'll mean I don't have links I want to click disapearing. I've lost topics I thought looked interesting because they disapeared just as I went to visit them and sometimes I just don't have the motivation to then go do a search for it.

:) You understand. I get that some people will disagree with my thought-process, which is fine, but I'm glad to see you are actually living proof of what I mean.

Thats hardly the case, its just a few "very vocal" users who are griping about the ad.

Meh, i would say its only vocal users who actually bother to comment either way (against or for the ad). The others just cant be bothered to comment.

The majority of commenters, sure. What about all those who genuinely don't care enough to comment? As for your post 10, don't think you're not being listened to - we wouldn't be having this dialogue if you weren't. We just disagree.

Exaclty, they just dont care to comment either way.

I dont think we are not being listened to mate. Im sure we are, otherwise we wouldnt be in this thread having this discussion :).

My other thought is, that the reason that ad is going to generate extra revenue, is because people may accidently click on it rather than click on it, because the ad has something they genuinly wanted to look at...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop data 'Google Chrome' is downloading for Chrome without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing 'Microsoft Edge' on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!