GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

yeah, steam update for gta4 is broken

Rockstar says

Sorry, there is a problem with the Steam update version of the patch. We have a fix and are working to get in updated asap. In the meantime please update using the downloadable patch to fix the crash.

http://www.rockstargames.com/support/IV/PC/patch/index.html

So, is this worth playing now with the fixes?

I have a GTX295 and I do not want to purchase a game that is riddled with issues still.

With hardware like that, I'd say it's worth it. I assume you have a high end quad-core CPU to complement that beast of a video card. Suffices to say, the game will run quite smoothly.

Direct Download - GTA IV PC Patch v1.0.3

Version 1.0.3.0 - Change log:

GRAPHICS:

* Interior Lights for ATI 1900 series cards:

o All light sources appear for users with 1900 series ATI cards. (ie. Pool Mini Game)

o ALT-TAB fixed

* Graphics Settings:

o Added menu option " OFF " for Reflection quality

o Added menu option " OFF " for Shadow quality

PERFORMANCE:

* Physics optimizations to improve situations with heavy physics calculations (ie. 32 player races)

* Graphical Performance Optimizations

MULTIPLAYER:

* NAT Type detection

o Detect if user has a " strict " NAT and displays message for user

* Voice chat is received even if your microphone is turned off

CONTROLS:

* Keyboard / Mouse

o Remapping restrictions removed

o Allow Enter, Backspace, and Arrow keys to be remapped by user

o Allow multiple mouse buttons to be mapped

* Enable/Disable DirectInput in Menu

o Users can now activate/deactivate Direct Input devices from "Controls" menu.

o If commandline "-usedirectinput" is active, it will override pause menu setting.

* Use 2 direct input devices simultaneously (ie. Wheel and Gamepad)

o Users can now use 2 different controllers at once, including 1 XInput and 1 Direct Input device.

* Added more Direct Input / XInput device support

o Saitek P380/P480/P580/P990

o Saitek PS1000/PS2700/P3200/P3600

o Gravis Eliminator Shock gamepad

SECURITY:

* Detect modified files and prevent users from entering multiplayer if found

o Game will prompt with a message after blocking user with modified data files from entering multiplayer

o Should prevent multiplayer access from cell phone and GFWL join in progress

VIDEO EDITOR:

* Scroll Bar improved response

o Tweaked to respond better to keyboard inputs

* Sped up load times for users with many clips

TITLE UPDATE 2 FIXES:

* Return of Hot Dog Stands and other props

o Missing hot dog vendors, fences, gates, pylons should be present throughout the world.

* Scrolling signboards

o Activate missing scrolling signboard text (ie. highway signs, Star Junction, Clock Tower Sign)

* ALT-TAB pauses game during cutscenes

o Cutscenes should now pause and resume correctly after an ALT-TAB task switch. Audio remains in sync.

GENERAL ADDITIONS / FIXES:

* Mismatched MODO/Perseus Clothing

o Fixed a bug when Niko mixes clothing from Perseus and Modo

* 360 Controller Texture

o Controller image should be visible in Controller Configuration screen

Interesting. Can someone with the game tell us how much this all helps out? Thanks.

I play the game, but I'm not yet available to test it out since I've downloaded & applied it because I am doing a 24hr fold-a-thon for another forum I am on, I'll be able to test it out tomorrow and will report back as well. :)

in reply to peters post, on the other thread, you need to download the patch manually and install it yourself, R* borked up the steam patch, if u go here: http://www.rockstargames.com/support/IV/PC/patch/index.html download and install it your game will run

Bought the game in December, installed it, graphics consistently get corrupted within 2-3 minutes (missing roads, buildings, etc...) Installed the first patch, no help. I'm hoping this'll take care of that problem.

If not, I guess it'll keep collecting dust until I replace my system (Athlon X2 4800, 2GB RAM, 8800GTS w/320MB)...in the meantime I've certainly lost all interest in the game...

Bought the game in December, installed it, graphics consistently get corrupted within 2-3 minutes (missing roads, buildings, etc...) Installed the first patch, no help. I'm hoping this'll take care of that problem.

If not, I guess it'll keep collecting dust until I replace my system (Athlon X2 4800, 2GB RAM, 8800GTS w/320MB)...in the meantime I've certainly lost all interest in the game...

Common problem if you've chosen settings higher than your system can handle.

Just installed the patch to see what sort of performance boosts I get.

Ran outside. Started driving...then realized my car was going way too fast and the game felt like it was going in 1.5x speed.

I know this was an issue with the initial release so I change the game down to 3 cores, felt a bit better, but not perfect.

Hasn't really changed much else. Game runs 'fine' for me, but still not like one would expect.

Who would play this with a X1900 series card? I had one and gave it to my daughter. I doubt it could handle this game at high settings at all.

People that don't have money or incentive to upgrade. It's a decent video card but it's definitely not good enough for GTA IV. I have an HD 4870 and it's playable, but barely enjoyable. You'll need a Core i7 gaming rig coupled with a very high end CrossFire or SLI configuration to run the game (maxed out) at 60 FPS.

I played the Game on my Q6600 along with 512mb 9600GT & 4 gigs of RAM on my Vista x64SP1. It had Medium Texture & everything else settled at High .

The Game gave me 46fps on the benchmark & it also ran pretty smooth . Too bad i have already played & finished it on my now , RROD Xbox 360 .

I played the Game on my Q6600 along with 512mb 9600GT & 4 gigs of RAM on my Vista x64SP1. It had Medium Texture & everything else settled at High .

The Game gave me 46fps on the benchmark & it also ran pretty smooth . Too bad i have already played & finished it on my now , RROD Xbox 360 .

What resolution do you play at? 1440x900? I've yet to break the 35 FPS barrier with my rig: C2D E6750 @ 3.2 GHz, HD 4870, and 8GB DDR2 RAM + Windows Vista Ultimate x64 w/ SP1.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!